Вот и Джона Краули («Маленький, большой», «Эгипет») не стало. Один раз с ним встречались, на «Портале-2007». Печаль.
💔36😢21❤1

Channel
@SpeculativeFiction
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
4,683subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001254529747 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @SpeculativeFiction |
| Created | 28 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/SpeculativeFiction |
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “speculative_fiction” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 4,683 | -2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 00:00 | 4,685 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 18:55 | 4,695 | +4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 16:19 | 4,691 | +9 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 18:59 | 4,682 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 18:26 | 4,683 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 4,687 | -6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 4,693 | -2 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:57 | 4,695 | -3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 4,698 | +2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:53 | 4,696 | -2 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 17:25 | 4,698 | -2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 21:26 | 4,700 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:52 | 4,697 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:33 | 4,697 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 24 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
1,140 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 320 | 28.1% | |
| 👍 | 232 | 20.4% | |
| 😁 | 229 | 20.1% | |
| ❤ | 213 | 18.7% | |
| 😢 | 71 | 6.23% | |
| 💔 | 69 | 6.05% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 0.263% | |
| 😱 | 3 | 0.263% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вот и Джона Краули («Маленький, большой», «Эгипет») не стало. Один раз с ним встречались, на «Портале-2007». Печаль.
💔36😢21❤1
Что ж, по итогам первой половины 2026 года книги Стругацких на 16 месте по востребованности среди художественной литературы. Между Лией Арден и Рэем Брэдбери, лол. Ну, посмотрим, что там в конце года получится.
🔥15😁15❤6😢2👍1
В личке справедливо указывают, что в среднем выживаемость у охотников и собирателей была выше, чем у первых земледельцев. И это, безусловно, верно – с одним нюансом: пока охотников было мало, а дичи много. Это определенно не случай навахо. Ну и стоит учесть, что они пришли на готовенькое и позаимствовали уже вполне развитые скотоводческие и земледельческие технологии, а не проходили все этапы неолитической революции …
👍31🔥8
Когда автор, принадлежащей к условной «западной культуре» - европеец, русский, американец и т.д. – пытается залезть в голову к представителю «коренного народа», часто получается кринж. А когда человек письменной культуры к человеку культуры дописьменной, кринж получается всегда, без исключений, автоматически. Перечитываю сейчас «Глаз кота» Роджера Желязны, там главный герой индеец-навахо, чтящий традиции своего народ…
👍46🔥17❤11💩1😱1
Да, кстати, специально посмотрел: "жутко малоизвестный писатель" из отзыва ☝️☝️☝️ - это Тед Чан. Ну, знаете, тот, по которому снято "Прибытие" Вильнёва. Вот уж действительно, кто о нем слышал...
😁82😢8
#о_нас_пишут – в смысле, пишут о книге «Картографы рая и ада» читатели и слушатели на «Яндекс.Книгах». Все отзывы прекрасные, я прямо разрываюсь. Но мой фаворит видимо все-таки Андрей: как говорится, краткость – сестра таланта.
😁63😢10🔥6👍3❤2💩1
Полезная книжка – «Ухрония» Эммануэля Каррера. Просто эталонное сочетание интеллектуальной ленности, некомпетентности и снобизма. Прямо не на шутку меня выбесила, чего непросто добиться. Люблю книги, которые вызывают сильные чувства. Подробности воспоследуют, уже пишу.
😁48🔥16😢2😱2
Тем временем К.А.Терина уверенно теснит Салмана Рушди. 👇👇👇 Горжусь знакомством! Не с Рушди.
🔥16❤8
осторожно, этот пост написан прямиком из ахуя: мой сборник рассказов Black Hole Heart and Other Stories (перевёл на анлийский Алекс Шварцман, издали “Fairwood Press”) — в шорт-листе World Fantasy Awards 2026
🔥73❤23👍5
С другой стороны, обнаружил, что не могу читать романы «на злобу дня». Даже хорошие (ну, если верить на слово коллегам, которые их все-таки прочитали, тезке Книгобаре например). Понимаю, почему авторы их сочиняют, понимаю, почему читатели их читают (хотя вроде бы уже меньше, утомились). И пусть пишут и читают, не осуждаю. Но нет. Хочется не эскапизма, конечно, не пресловутого бегства от реальности, будь она трижды пр…
👍35❤14😢9😁2
Отношения с технооптимизмом у меня сложные. Да и вообще с оптимизмом. На выходных забрал в СДЭКе внезапный подарок от организаторов конкурса «Инженеры слова». А вчера, возвращаясь из ближайшего лабаза, прочитал на двери подъезда, что в связи с какими-то там испытаниями в нашем доме на 4 дня отключают горячую воду. Вторая четверть XXI века, товарищи, яблони на Марсе цветут пышным цветом. И во всю колосятся. Но как че…
🔥27👍16😁13❤4
http://bvi.rusf.ru/fx/fx031.pdf
❤13
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @SpeculativeFiction. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Vasily Vladimirsky |
|---|---|
| Official site | http://vvladimirsky.narod.ru/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“speculative_fiction | Василий Владимирский” (@SpeculativeFiction), 4,683 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/SpeculativeFiction.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.