Channel
@magie_bizarre
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,514subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001158550143 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @magie_bizarre |
| Created | 29 March 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/magie_bizarre |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Recorded in 2019 as “magie bizarre” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 3,514 | -1 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 03:00 | 3,515 | +5 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 3,510 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:04 | 3,514 | -32 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 05:05 | 3,546 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 3,545 | +6 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 3,539 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:55 | 3,541 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:47 | 3,537 | +3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 3,534 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 3,534 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
769 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 567 | 73.7% | |
| 😨 | 74 | 9.62% | |
| 🤪 | 41 | 5.33% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 3.25% | |
| 👻 | 24 | 3.12% | |
| 🐳 | 19 | 2.47% | |
| 😢 | 9 | 1.17% | |
| 😈 | 6 | 0.78% | |
| 💅 | 4 | 0.52% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 769 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
На днях (с некоторым опозданием) узнала про себя новость: я, оказывается, "тусовалась с толкинистами". Того и гляди, узнаю, что я потомственная москвичка (было бы неплохо, кстати). Граждане! Доверяйте только проверенным источникам, а непроверенным не доверяйте. И будет вам счастье.
😨42❤12🤪8🐳1
А если мне чего-то по-настоящему жаль из выкинутого Ноланом, то, разумеется, феакийцев и их кораблей. Землю, и град, и народ свой потом назови, чтоб согласно С волей твоей и корабль наш свое направление выбрал; Кормщик не правит в морях кораблем феакийским; руля мы, Нужного каждому судну, на наших судах не имеем; Сами они понимают своих корабельщиков мысли Ну вы же понимаете, я надеюсь, почему.
❤81
А еще в фильме звучит — в дубляже и, догадываюсь, в оригинале — слово "цивилизация". ИМХО, его нельзя считать маркером нолановского замысла (про катастрофу Бронзового века и вот это все). Это банальный маркер современной, как бы ее назвать, лексической небрежности англоязычных авторов худлита и сообразных комментаторов. Так-то термин придуман в XVIII веке и сам по себе, конечно, такой же анахронизм, как многие другие…
❤51
Тот факт, что "Одиссея" мне понравилась, вовсе не означает, что я не вижу в фильме причудливых и временами нелепых анахронизмов и не имею к нему кое-каких претензий. Вижу и имею. Просто на общее впечатление ни то, ни другое не повлияло. И можно было бы высказаться, но гомероведов и одиссеезнатцев стало так много, что я лучше промолчу. P.S. Впрочем, не совсем промолчу: вот читаю тут в одном тексте на тему фильма, чт…
❤70
#внезапно Посмотрела "Одиссею" и мне понравилось.
❤45👍11💅4😢4
Внезапно появились новые подписчики (понятия не имею, откуда), поэтому на всякий случай признаюсь и новым, и старым, что я в совершенно разобранном состоянии по совокупности причин, и тут могут (столь же внезапно) появиться посты на самые разные темы, в том числе не связанные с литературой вообще. Или не появиться. (Вот сейчас подписчики и уйдут, ахаха, то есть мяу.) #прожизнь
❤84🐳17😢5👻3👍1
Мой третий роман, "Семь Семенов", выходит в издательстве ЭКСМО. Это история о Семене Костине, обычном человеке, жившем в Центральной России в 1881-1941 годах и выбравшего для себя не видеть зла как намеренного действия людей. Не видеть и не страшиться, жить сквозь революции, гражданские и мировые войны, быть типографом, художником, учителем — и просто счастливым настолько, насколько возможно. Это исторический реали…
❤31🐳1👍1
Немного иллюстраций. Первые три — Filipe Pagliuso, вторые — Tyrone Le Roux-Atterbury. Картинок на самом деле намного больше, ищите в сети, если хотите.
❤41
Photo, posted without a caption
❤34
Митчелл Люти «Пилигрим. Средневековый хоррор» (Pilgrim: A Medieval Horror) #прочитано Левант, примерно 1173 год. Крепкие стены Иерусалимского королевства начинают шататься, подтачиваемые внутренними и внешними врагами. Интриги при дворе стареющего и слабеющего Амори I становятся все более дерзкими, а могущество Нур ад-Дина и влияние Салах ад-Дина неуклонно нарастают. Что-то меняется, и многие предчувствуют роковые с…
❤50
Встроенный в гугл-почту гугл-переводчик, оказывается, настоящий мастер вот-это-поворотов...
🤪32❤4
Ну это же невозможно не перепостить (хотя замечу, что текст "Лобушкина" неполный — если вам тема интересна, читайте статью Reuters по ссылке).
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @magie_bizarre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“magie bizarre | Наталия Осояну” (@magie_bizarre), 3,514 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/magie_bizarre.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.