Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Мистер Дарси и бал

Channel

Мистер Дарси и бал

@mrdarcyandballs

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,170subscribers

+21 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001089916989
TypeChannel
Username@mrdarcyandballs
Created6 December 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mrdarcyandballs

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,14911,28211,215.56 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,149 subscribers6 August 2026 — 11,152 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,154 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,157 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,159 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,158 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,167 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,196 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,213 subscribers16 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,218 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,221 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,229 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,232 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,229 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,226 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,225 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,223 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,222 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,221 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,238 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,215 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,216 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,220 subscribers5 September 2026 — 11,221 subscribers8 September 2026 — 11,242 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,275 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,282 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,245 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,255 subscribers25 September 2026 — 11,266 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,222 subscribers8 October 2026 — 11,218 subscribers12 October 2026 — 11,213 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,202 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,199 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,198 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,195 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,194 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,193 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,190 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,188 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,185 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,186 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,174 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,173 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,177 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,180 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,183 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,188 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,164 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,167 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,166 subscribers6 November 2026 — 11,169 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,170 subscribers11,1706 August 20267 November 2026
56 measurements spanning 93 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,129–11,302 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 04:0111,170+1
6 Nov 2026, 03:1011,169+3
5 Nov 2026, 00:2111,166-1
3 Nov 2026, 20:5711,167+3
2 Nov 2026, 21:5611,164-24
1 Nov 2026, 22:1711,188+5
30 Oct 2026, 21:3911,183+3
29 Oct 2026, 21:5011,180+3
29 Oct 2026, 00:0011,177+4
27 Oct 2026, 23:2911,173-1
27 Oct 2026, 02:0611,174-12
26 Oct 2026, 00:0411,186+1
25 Oct 2026, 00:1411,185-3
23 Oct 2026, 22:2511,188-2
22 Oct 2026, 23:4911,190-3
21 Oct 2026, 21:4611,193-1
19 Oct 2026, 13:4811,194-1
18 Oct 2026, 16:5911,195-3
17 Oct 2026, 16:5711,198-1
15 Oct 2026, 12:5811,199first reading

Engagement

45 posts held, back to 12 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 11,170 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,070
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 45 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held45 (12 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total36,860
Reactions total1,517
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 20:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 00s
Average length
1m 00s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,746 reactions across 43 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,59462.5%
🔥65911.5%
❤‍🔥65611.4%
😁5249.12%
💔1632.84%
💯611.06%
🕊320.557%
🎉260.452%
🙏260.452%
😱50.087%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 45 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,746 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 45 most recent posts we hold, published 12 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (25.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 04:38 UTC≈1,440 views77 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Кое-что из университетского книжного магазина: англоязычная переводная проза с оригинальными обложками, издательство оранжевая панда (!), Мураками и «Женщины Лазаря» вместе с «Федором Михайловичем Достоевским» Я тем временем читаю новую Июнь Ли (Kinder Than Solitude) Music Against the Night, кажется, хорошая! Расскажите, что у вас. Соню и Саню все уже прочитали?)

🔥46❤31

2 Nov 2026, 03:59 UTC≈2,300 views128 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

The Things They Carried Этот натюрморт призван рассказать, во-первых, где я, во-вторых, до какого примерно числа планирую здесь оставаться :) #путешествует, точнее, #преподает elsewhere

🔥71❤45😁12

27 Oct 2026, 13:36 UTC≈3,710 views118 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

ДЕВОЧКИ, ПОЕХАЛИ В РУАН! #коллекционерпрограммок «Мадам Бовари» Андрия Жолдака, Театр антрепризы им. Андрея Миронова Пускай до этого театра я могу добежать на каблуках за 5 минут, не бывала там со школьных времени и «Портрета Дориана Грея». Или «1900» Меньшикова показывали тоже там? Не важно, важно, что в остальном там смотреть нечего, и спасибо большое подписчице Лене, рассказавшей про «Бовари» и даже подсказавшей…

❤82🔥29🎉7

26 Oct 2026, 10:58 UTC≈3,080 views175 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Маргарет Этвуд дня, чтобы отпраздновать завершение «Англоязычного рассказа ХХ века» в этом семестре Закончили рассказом Happy Endings, конечно же

❤141❤‍🔥34

24 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈3,600 views174 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Пушкин дня!) Поэта обнаружил в Париже глаз-алмаз Виталия Котова 👌

❤97😁60🔥17

23 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC≈3,190 views278 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня, в день рождения Ульяны Лопаткиной (так совпало), я дочитала Квартет Фредерики, который А. С. Байетт писала с 1978 по 2002 год, а я читала с 2015 по 2026-ой. We shall think of something. 💔💔💔

❤212💔66

20 Oct 2026, 13:43 UTC≈3,610 views154 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

'For my own part,' said he, 'I am excessively fond of a cottage; there is always so much comfort, so much elegance about them. And I protest, if I had any money to spare, I should buy a little land and build one myself, within a short distance of London, where I might drive myself down at any time, and collect a few friends about me and be happy. I advise everybody who is going to build, to build a cottage. — Sense …

❤85😁41❤‍🔥14🔥14

18 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC≈3,710 views72 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

#коллекционерпрограммок «Бронепоезд 14-69», театр Драмплощадка, реж. Дмитрий Крестьянкин Сходила на новый спектакль Крестьянкина, и мне, увы, не понравилось. (Много размышляю в последнее время о работах современных режиссеров, которые мы смотрим сплошняком, без выборки, без проверки временем и смыслом; как все-таки полезен диахронический подход! Вон Баланчин поставил миллион балетов и балетиков, и далеко не каждый …

❤64💯8

17 Oct 2026, 09:20 UTC≈2,910 views74 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Еще я в восторге, что у Геракла-мальчика вот такие уже крепкие ножищи: точно герой, а не танцовщик, приземистый такой) Взрослый Геракл (по-прежнему крепок) на заднем плане

❤74

17 Oct 2026, 08:53 UTC≈2,820 views92 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Античное искусство напоминает, что кое-кто давно не был на балете. Ногам этого пляшущего сатира каждый танцовщик позавидует!

❤‍🔥61❤31

16 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC≈3,160 views75 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В Москву я езжу не так уж редко, но все равно каждый приезд стараюсь сделать максимально насыщенным; не всякий раз получается сходить в театр два раза за вечер (!), но пара выставок в день — это норма. В пятницу между Пушкинским и Врубелем в Музее декоративного искусства прекрасная Даша повела меня гулять — и показала кое-что, за чем не нужно специально приезжать, что находится в Москве давно и прочно, что трудно не…

❤62🔥13

14 Oct 2026, 13:54 UTC≈3,330 views100 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Две новинки издательства Слово — Москва и Петербург ❤️ «Московскую» книжку прочла запоем (да, я неравнодушна к итальянцам), и у меня в списке к посещению теперь есть еще один неожиданный собор — и здание встреч бывших революционеров. А вы знали, что Спасскую башню спроектировал итальянский архитектор? Вот и я не знала. «Петербургская» книжка покорила биографией одного из авторов: «сейчас живет в XVIII веке». А вы з…

❤75❤‍🔥25

Showing the 12 most recent of 45 posts we hold for @mrdarcyandballs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mrdarcyandballs edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
23 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Толще твиттера
@biggakniga · 26,244
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 September 2026
Армен и Фёдор
@armenifedor · 41,810
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
Рыба Лоцман
@ryba_lotsman · 52,211
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 24 August 2026
Мариинский театр
@mariinsky · 24,748
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 September 2026
Полка
@polka_academy · 22,133
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 September 2026
еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 44,348
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Страдариум
@stradarium1 · 36,348
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Мистер Дарси и бал” (@mrdarcyandballs), 11,170 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mrdarcyandballs.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.