Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Журнал Логос

Channel

Журнал Логос

@wowlogos

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,964subscribers

+670 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466016887
TypeChannel
Username@wowlogos
DescriptionТелеграм-канал философско-литературного журнала «Логос» logosjournal.ru
Created13 July 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/wowlogos

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 68% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,2917,0476,6696 August 2026 — 6,294 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,294 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,293 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,294 subscribers12 August 2026 — 6,293 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,291 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,294 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,317 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,324 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,327 subscribers5 September 2026 — 6,338 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,382 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,406 subscribers18 September 2026 — 6,411 subscribers27 September 2026 — 6,437 subscribers5 October 2026 — 6,438 subscribers12 October 2026 — 6,455 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,471 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,480 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,690 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,769 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,047 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,974 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,964 subscribers6,9646 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 89 days, net +670. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,178–7,160 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 11:006,964-10
31 Oct 2026, 13:596,974-73
28 Oct 2026, 14:547,047+278
25 Oct 2026, 12:066,769+79
22 Oct 2026, 09:416,690+210
19 Oct 2026, 10:546,480+9
16 Oct 2026, 00:286,471+16
12 Oct 2026, 13:506,455+17
5 Oct 2026, 16:176,438+1
27 Sept 2026, 19:166,437+26
18 Sept 2026, 16:416,411+5
14 Sept 2026, 10:166,406+24
10 Sept 2026, 13:206,382+44
5 Sept 2026, 12:216,338+11
1 Sept 2026, 11:266,327+3
29 Aug 2026, 17:246,324+7
26 Aug 2026, 12:136,317+23
19 Aug 2026, 22:566,294+3
16 Aug 2026, 14:576,291-2
12 Aug 2026, 17:046,293first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 3 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
50.4%
avg views ÷ 6,964 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,510
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held26 (3 March 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total21,080
Reactions total379
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
394
Videos
3
Links
260

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

1,917 reactions across 26 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤54628.5%
❤‍🔥47424.7%
🔥36719.1%
🕊1176.10%
🍾824.28%
👏663.44%
🥰623.23%
😁542.82%
🤩442.30%
👍392.03%
🎉311.62%
😈90.469%
🤯80.417%
🐳60.313%
💋60.313%
😍40.209%
😢10.052%
🤔10.052%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,917 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 3 March 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 10:07 UTC≈2,440 views138 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🔧 Скоро

🔥76❤‍🔥40❤15👏6👍1

21 Oct 2026, 12:14 UTC≈3,230 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Разыгрываем «Книгу Пассажей» Вальтера Беньямина и номер «Логоса», посвященный ей! Беньямин работал над «Книгой Пассажей» с 1927 года до самой смерти в 1940-м и так ее и не закончил. Он выписывал цитаты из путеводителей, газет, рекламных проспектов, мемуаров и стихов, раскладывал их по темам (мода, скука, железные конструкции, коллекционер, фланёр) и сопровождал собственными заметками. Из этого архива должна была сло…

❤‍🔥42🔥14❤6🍾3👍1

20 Oct 2026, 09:50 UTC≈2,320 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @admarginemPhoto

Вывели в продажу комплект из «Книги Пассажей» Вальтера Беньямина и нового номера журнала «Логос», целиком посвященного этой книге. Над «Пассажами» Беньямин работал тринадцать лет, до самой смерти в 1940 году, и так их и не закончил. Исследование парижских торговых галерей разрослось в огромный архив XIX века, разложенный по тематическим папкам-конволютам: мода, реклама, железные конструкции, фланёр, Бодлер. Большую …

🔥12❤4🍾2🎉1

15 Oct 2026, 10:47 UTC≈7,210 views93 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня исполняется 100 лет Мишелю Фуко. Он одним из первых показал, как философия может выходить в поисках решения своих проблем далеко за собственные пределы, разворачиваясь в напряженном диалоге с современностью. При всем тематическом и эмпирическом многообразии своих исследований — а разброс поистине велик, — Фуко неизменно возвращался к одному вопросу: «Кто мы такие сегодня?». Одно желание Фуко сбылось. Он хоте…

❤56🎉20🍾10🔥5😁2

14 Oct 2026, 14:43 UTC≈2,680 views32 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @critiquefailagain

Новый номер «Логоса» про «Книгу Пассажей» Беньямина до прочтения обоснованно может вызвать реакцию, «ну, сколько можно», «опять что ли» и т.п. И сам «Логос» уже много всего про Беньямина печатал (не только в классическом номере про «Московский дневник»), и в других изданиях Беньямин давно стал уже кем-то вроде не то куклы, не то карлика из «Понятия истории», без которого не обходятся актуальные философские сюжеты. И …

❤25👏4🕊3

9 Oct 2026, 10:28 UTC≈3,200 views31 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @izdaniyaPhoto

Три новинки для тех, у кого этой осенью все просто 🤩 «Убили бы вы толстяка? Задача о вагонетке: что такое хорошо и что такое плохо?» Почему философы все еще увлечены воображаемой смертью толстяка? Долгожданное переиздание книги Дэвида Эдмондса, в которой он устраивает читателю увлекательный тур по истории моральной философии и приглашает к размышлению о том, что принято называть «правильным» и «неправильным». Книга …

🔥19❤‍🔥6👏4❤2

10 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC≈9,600 views91 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

📚 У нашего друга и коллеги, шеф-редактора «Логоса» Александра Павлова, вышла новая книга о постмарксизме. Долгое время термином «западный марксизм» описывали философов-марксистов, соединявших идеи Маркса с другими интеллектуальными течениями XX века. Но к концу 1970-х, когда все чаще заговорили о кризисе марксизма, для новых левых потребовалось другое определение. Так появился постмарксизм. Александр предлагает испо…

❤‍🔥40❤18👏16🎉4🤯4😈3🍾2🐳2

8 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC≈4,150 views14 reactionsread 6 November 2026

📚 Книжный магазин БукВышка, Журнал Логос и Издательский дом ВШЭ разыгрывают два номера журнала Логос 3, 2026 «Кручёных» и брендированные шопперы ВШЭ. 🎁 Номер посвящен наследию и творчеству Алексея Кручёных (1886-1968), русского поэта-футуриста, издателя, коллекционера, художника, теоретика стиха и создателя «заумного языка», одного из ключевых представителей русского авангарда. Условия конкурса: 📍подпишитесь на кан…

❤11👏3

7 Sept 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,150 views41 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @bookshsePhoto

Новый номер журнала Логос | том 36 | 3, 2026 | Кручёных - 569 ₽. Уже у нас!

❤30🍾8🎉3

2 Sept 2026, 17:29 UTC≈9,630 views69 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🫨 Свежий номер «Логоса» КРУЧЕНЫХ Том 36 № 3 2026 уже эксклюзивно продается на Московской международной книжной ярмарке. До конца недели его можно найти в Гостином дворе (Ильинка 4), на стенде Издательского дома Высшей школы экономики — А15. Номер посвящен Алексею Крученых, одному из самых радикальных и при этом самых недооцененных русских авангардистов. От знаменитого «Дыр бул щыл» и «Победы над Солнцем» до дневни…

❤‍🔥40❤19🍾5😍4💋1

21 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC≈12,100 views174 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🏛 Скоро

❤‍🔥87🔥49❤14👏10🍾6😈6💋2

26 Jun 2026, 09:56 UTC≈10,700 views89 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

К 35-летию «Логоса» вышло большое интервью нашего главного редактора Валерия Анашвили изданию «Финиковый компот» Разговор получился насыщенным. Анашвили вспоминает, как студенческий проект начала 90-х, бросивший вызов интеллигентскому пустословию, превратился в центральное философское издание страны. Рассказывает, как феноменология воспринималась не просто как одна из школ, а как единственная альтернатива идеологизи…

❤46🔥22🍾12👍4🎉2😁2❤‍🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @wowlogos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

PhilosophyToday
@Philosophytoday · 19,750
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,645
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026
Горький
@gorky_media · 19,011
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 October 2026
Гуманитарные конференции
@confhum · 26,137
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 14 September 2026
по краям
@admarginem · 33,659
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Книжный импорт
@importknig · 35,469
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Журнал Логос” (@wowlogos), 6,964 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wowlogos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.