Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Эллин Ти <3

Channel

Эллин Ти <3

@ellin_ti

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,116subscribers

+50 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001302321319
TypeChannel
Username@ellin_ti
Created18 February 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ellin_ti

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,9489,1169,0326 August 2026 — 9,066 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,071 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,047 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,021 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,025 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,011 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,988 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,977 subscribers31 August 2026 — 8,965 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,950 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,948 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,985 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,083 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,116 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +50. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,923–9,141 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:429,116+33
15 Sept 2026, 06:399,083+98
11 Sept 2026, 17:418,985+37
6 Sept 2026, 23:408,948-2
2 Sept 2026, 16:448,950-15
31 Aug 2026, 01:368,965-12
27 Aug 2026, 16:148,977-11
24 Aug 2026, 22:238,988-23
21 Aug 2026, 10:459,011-14
18 Aug 2026, 03:519,025+4
14 Aug 2026, 21:269,021-26
11 Aug 2026, 16:379,047-24
6 Aug 2026, 09:419,071+5
6 Aug 2026, 04:529,066first reading

Engagement

108 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
16.3%
avg views ÷ 9,116 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,480
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 108 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held108 (4 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total43,060
Reactions total6,010
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 39s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

21,341 reactions across 105 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12,58859.0%
🔥2,23510.5%
❤‍🔥1,9439.10%
😁1,4246.67%
🍓1,2475.84%
💅6172.89%
💔3771.77%
😍3671.72%
👏1870.876%
😈1560.731%
😱710.333%
😭660.309%
😢630.295%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 108 of the 108 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21,858 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 108 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 108 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ellin_ti. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 108 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 14:01 UTC460 views134 reactionsread 28 August 2026

А вообще есть желание выпустить какой-нибудь Дарк роман под другим именем, чтобы вы не знали, что это мой 😂 Потому что под Эллин Ти я плохого мужика не имею права писать, а спрос на дарки такой большой.....

80😁27🔥18😈6🍓2💔1

28 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTC481 views102 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Я такая: истории с литнета никогда не выйдут в бумаге Тоже я: удаляю очередную книгу с сайта, потому что отдала ее в издательство...

68❤‍🔥19💔11🍓4

28 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC589 views117 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Уже очень скоро мы поддержим "малышку" в руках ВЫ НЕ В ШОКЕ?

94🍓16❤‍🔥7

27 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC≈1,270 views184 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Простите за разврат. У меня на литнет нет другого...

127❤‍🔥29🔥20🍓8

27 Aug 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,310 views216 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ульяна: вспомнила наш секс и теперь дико хочу тебя. Я в ванной... Без всего. Марат: Блять, куколка... Я на важной встрече. И у меня встал. Отшлепаю тебя за это. Вернусь пораньше. Пошалишь без меня? «Отец моего жениха», новая глава ❤️

147🔥34😍25🍓7❤‍🔥3

27 Aug 2026, 17:52 UTC≈1,310 views182 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Если вы читали на литнет историю «В поисках притяжения», (препод/студентка), то, наверное, помните, что у героя был малыш корги по кличке Каспер? Ну он ожил, получается😁❤️ Назвала свою собаку в честь той, кого написала год назад) Пошла всё-таки работать! Ожидайте Маратика

❤‍🔥12238🔥17🍓5

27 Aug 2026, 17:49 UTC≈1,330 views291 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Я не могу работать, меня прижало зверем и нет возможности встать 💁‍♀

198😍49🔥34😁7🍓2❤‍🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 11:02 UTC≈1,470 views276 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Вспомнила, что у нас не вышло переиздание "нелюбви" и расстроилась Все еще считаю, что их пара одна из самых классных, потому что нет лишней сладости, драмы и прочего. Просто настоящие Дашка и Лёшка🫠

197💔47🍓20🔥10❤‍🔥2

26 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC≈1,560 views214 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Закончила за сегодня не только главу, но и очередную редактуру! Пойду отмокну в ванной и вернусь к Пашке😐

143🍓35😁26👏7❤‍🔥2🔥1

26 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC≈1,640 views222 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

— Переживаешь, сладенькая? — наглая ухмылка меня буквально убивает, потому что именно на нее я и повелась там, у бара, почти без лишних просьб раздвинув ноги. — Не хочу стать подельником в убийстве человека. — Какая грозная, — он облизывает губы. — У меня встал. Придурок. — У тебя рана в башке, ничего? — Как это мешает моему члену на тебя реагировать? — Тебя вообще ничего не смущает? — Только то, что ты не нос

150😁36💅22🍓7🔥4❤‍🔥3

25 Aug 2026, 23:00 UTC≈1,640 views246 reactionsread 28 August 2026

34к знаков, Пашка-хоккеист нафлиртовал🙂‍↔️ Пошла спать, завтра продолжу ❤️

174🔥37🍓26❤‍🔥9

25 Aug 2026, 18:58 UTC≈1,670 views313 reactions1 Starread 28 August 2026

Хочу писать наглых спортсменов с пошлыми шутками до конца жизни

😁18564😈52❤‍🔥6🍓4🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 108 posts we hold for @ellin_ti. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@ellin_ti edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
18 August 2026
Most recent edit
18 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сорри, я не твоя лав стори
@not_love_story · 23,523
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Ася Лавринович
@aslavrinovich · 26,693
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Лия Арден | Мара и Морок | книги 18+
@liaarden · 32,460
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
Софи Анри | Автор 📖
@sofianri · 22,247
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 21 September 2026
Алина Букстар | Книжный блогер
@alinabookstar · 25,944
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
Trendbooks 📖 книги YA
@clevertrendbooks · 61,605
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
DARYANEMK/Книжный блог
@daryanemk · 70,405
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 20 August 2026
Издательство Freedom 💜
@eksmofreedom · 39,257
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Издательство Like Book
@likebook_ya · 35,105
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 3 September 2026
Анна Джейн | Твоё сердце будет того
@anna_jane · 84,684
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 August 2026
DARYANEMK - LIFE BOOK STYLE
@daryanemklife · 26,548
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Эллин Ти <3” (@ellin_ti), 9,116 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ellin_ti.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.