Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for звездец какой-то

Channel

звездец какой-то

@etzvezdets

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

64,288subscribers

-404 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002039986765
TypeChannel
Username@etzvezdets
DescriptionКанал про звезд ввысь и вширь. Мы просто им завидуем ❤️ @zvezdetz — реклама, сотрудничество, сплетни
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held20
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/etzvezdets

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 72% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

64,28864,69264,4906 August 2026 — 64,692 subscribers7 August 2026 — 64,675 subscribers8 August 2026 — 64,643 subscribers9 August 2026 — 64,621 subscribers10 August 2026 — 64,582 subscribers11 August 2026 — 64,573 subscribers12 August 2026 — 64,561 subscribers13 August 2026 — 64,533 subscribers14 August 2026 — 64,535 subscribers15 August 2026 — 64,509 subscribers17 August 2026 — 64,475 subscribers18 August 2026 — 64,449 subscribers19 August 2026 — 64,432 subscribers20 August 2026 — 64,412 subscribers21 August 2026 — 64,380 subscribers22 August 2026 — 64,378 subscribers24 August 2026 — 64,355 subscribers25 August 2026 — 64,336 subscribers26 August 2026 — 64,307 subscribers27 August 2026 — 64,288 subscribers6 August 202627 August 2026
20 measurements spanning 21 days, net -404. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 64,227–64,753 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 16:4764,288-19
26 Aug 2026, 20:0664,307-29
25 Aug 2026, 17:2864,336-19
24 Aug 2026, 15:4264,355-23
22 Aug 2026, 23:5864,378-2
21 Aug 2026, 12:5264,380-32
20 Aug 2026, 15:1664,412-20
19 Aug 2026, 12:0564,432-17
18 Aug 2026, 09:5364,449-26
17 Aug 2026, 10:4364,475-34
15 Aug 2026, 18:1464,509-26
14 Aug 2026, 09:3664,535+2
13 Aug 2026, 03:1464,533-28
12 Aug 2026, 02:4264,561-12
11 Aug 2026, 03:3264,573-9
10 Aug 2026, 05:1064,582-39
9 Aug 2026, 05:0564,621-22
8 Aug 2026, 01:4364,643-32
7 Aug 2026, 02:0164,675-17
6 Aug 2026, 10:0264,692first reading

Engagement

408 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.42%
avg views ÷ 64,288 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,130
408 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
408
of 408 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 400 of 408 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held408 (6 August 202628 August 2026)
Views total1,685,144
Reactions total47,514
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
41,000
Videos
8,240
Links
3,740

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 122 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

47,514 reactions across 397 posts, in 63 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12,01425.3%
😁6,30013.3%
🤣6,03712.7%
🔥4,99010.5%
💩4,4739.41%
🤡2,3144.87%
👏1,4263.00%
💯1,2132.55%
🥴7131.50%
😢6631.40%
😱6451.36%
🙈6411.35%
🙏5971.26%
🥰5261.11%
💊5071.07%
🤯4771.00%
❤‍🔥4250.894%
😍3230.68%
🖕2700.568%
🤔2480.522%
43 further kinds2,7125.71%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 400 of the 408 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 47,514reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
13
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 408 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @etzvezdets. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 408 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.245%
1 of 408 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
5,170
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
4,270
over 407 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
CQH36pWzJqUqfuc6XQoNe1DmDdeRJa9oqc6JU2KykftDj6113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 408 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:40 UTC594 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Просто хочется напомнить вам об этой легендарной пиар-компании Владимира Жириновского перед очередными выборами.

👏16❤‍🔥4💩2

28 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC≈1,550 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Не признали Бьянку Цензори в одежде. В одежде мы видим модель, когда рядом с ней дети Канье Уэста. Ну и правильно, пусть готовится к России. А то в колготках ей в Питере в октябре ой как несладко придется.

😁363💩3

28 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈2,370 views82 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Лариса Гузеева зачем-то ополчилась на людей, которые выкладывают в интернет истории спасения бездомных животных. Мол, все это позерство ради лайков. Отчасти понимаем, что имеет в виду актриса. Но с ней не согласны. У многих современных людей уже выработалась привычка снимать все происходящее с ними на камеру. Плюс, какая разница, какой был мотив у человека, если в результате мы получаем счастливого и здорового пит

💯6911💩1🥴1

28 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC≈2,830 views30 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Это не эффект Манделы. На обеих фото по два Дукалиса

😁185🤔5🥱1😡1

28 Aug 2026, 11:01 UTC≈3,420 views143 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Дима Билан уверен, что мы заслужили такую сенсацию. Но мы все равно рады, что в полку пушистых прибыло ❤️

89👏21😁18💩8🤡7

28 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC≈4,060 views205 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Игорь Синяк на серьезных щах заявил, что ему писали: «что с этой укладкой, он похож на Бритни Спирс». А потом он видимо проснулся

🤣156💩45🖕31

28 Aug 2026, 09:55 UTC≈4,090 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Токсичный админ огурцы скупает тазиками и ведрами. Все из-за этого рецепта. Нет сил, как это вкусно и просто. Да и стоит копейки. А в ресторанах с вас шестьсот миллионов за такую закуску затребуют. ПОэтому повторяем дома: https://t.me/gofoodyfit/4003

5🔥21

28 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC≈4,270 views96 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Марию Кожевникову до слез растрогали горные пейзажи Кисловодска. Ну, милота

60🤡26💩10

28 Aug 2026, 09:01 UTC≈4,580 views114 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

Ничего себе, Оксана Самойлова как могет 😍

🔥68😍26💩20

28 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈4,860 views105 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

А журналисты Рен-ТВ явно не из пугливых оказались. Оставлять в покое жену Курбана Омарова они и не думают. Репортеры выяснили, что Валерия Омарова тайком продолжает делать процедуры даже после скандальной передачи! Правда она так боится клиентов с их вопросами про ее квалификацию, что даже наняла ОХРАНУ. Которая будет прогонять неугодных за дверь.

😁62🤣34🤬42🔥1🤡1🥱1

28 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈5,020 views277 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Тему на обсуждение несем. Согласны ли вы с Аленой Водонаевой? 👏🏻 - все так. 🌚 - в очередной раз сказала глупость.

🌚178👏69💩11🥱65🤔4🗿2💯1

28 Aug 2026, 07:06 UTC≈5,500 views486 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Ушла из жизни мама Ирины Алферовой 💔 Ксении Архиповне было 104 года. «Вчера попрощались с нашей Бамой. Ушла в мир иной Ксения Архиповна Алферова на 104-ом году жизни. Невероятная женщина! Она отражала Божий свет очень ярко и делилась со всеми щедро! Бабуля оставила свой свет во всех нас! У нас теперь есть очень сильный и заботливый ангел-хранитель. Царствие ей небесное. Бабушка-олицетворение любви. Настоящей, бе

🙏299🕊105💔60😭1210

Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @etzvezdets. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 13,135 of 1,622,561entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

Мужское Sense Of Luxury
@for_men_sol · 5,866
7 posts
Фэйс под контроль
@agecod · 1,239
3 posts
Как я съела вашу диету
@dietapoka · 631
3 posts
С любовью, ЗОЖ
@masha_pro_zozh · 10,314
3 posts
Главная по стройкам 👠
@a_plus_interio · 3,208
2 posts
Ножкой ать
@club_say_yes · 2,339
2 posts
мишлен и талия
@gofoodyfit · 637
2 posts
Крыспертиза
@gossipsinthecity · 15,534
2 posts
Кружевом по телу
@kruzhevompotelu · 3,756
2 posts
Мальдивы не предел
@mood4travel · 2,985
2 posts
Редактор в перьях
@redaktorvperyah · 5,009
2 posts
ЭКОНОМЬ С УМОМ|Скидки с WB Ozon Яндекс.Маркет
@skidkisymom · 928
2 posts
так совпали звёзды
@sovpalizvevdy · 1,416
2 posts
К чёрту диету!
@zozhnomozhno · 38,714
2 posts
Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 69,134
1 post
От батона до ретинола
@denbezpokupok · 13,209
1 post
Doctor Razumnaya
@doctor_razumnaya · 49,280
1 post
Доктор Евгения Новикова
@doctornovikova · 10,681
1 post
Кусочек счастья для бездомной кошки
@kusochekschastya_ru · 25,864
1 post
Лепота
@leepotaa · 80,616
1 post
Это мы сохраняем!
@mamkibanki · 12,676
1 post
Мара Чармер🔮
@maracharmer · 8,276
1 post
Никита Кологривый
@nik_kologrivyy · 36,524
1 post
Девушка высокого полёта
@privet_devushka · 32,803
1 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 69,134
#1
НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 127,350
#2
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,577
#3
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,412
#4
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 188,403
#5
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,257
#6
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,060
#7
Noomba
@noombaru · 15,082
#8
Светские хроники
@SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 133,970
#9
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 125,305
#10
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,354
#11
Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 51,225
#12
Вы только гляньте
@tolkoglyante · 8,798
#13
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 197,852
#14
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 155,353
#15
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 101,026
#16
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,748
#17
ФСН 🐞 OFFICIAL️
@fsnonline · 39,601
#18
Хватит слухов!
@hvatit_sluhov · 9,966
#19
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 195,132
#20
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 184,114
#21
Звезданулись
@ebanulisnews · 8,003
#22
Ирена Понарошку
@irena_ponaroshku · 283,724
#23
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 567,838
#24
Мода нищеброда
@moda_nishebroda · 7,989
#25
Король Артур
@realgoodmann · 39,872
#26
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 974,328
#27
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 112,014
#28
Вера в курсе
@verochkavkurse · 39,893
#29
Самые СЛИВки
@samye_slyvky · 52,536
#30
Mash
@mash · 3,108,794
#31
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,972,274
#32
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,843
#33
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,002
#34
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 430,982
#35
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,159,077
#36
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,540,640
#37
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,258,985
#38
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,670,923
#39
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 188,932
#40
Баба Яга против
@babaiga · 24,673
#41
Diana Live
@dianalivelive · 42,910
#42
Дорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,726
#43
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 637,400
#44
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,703,185
#45
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,658
#46
СВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,470
#47
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,203
#48
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 357,991
#49
VODA
@Avodonaeva · 146,218
#50
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 323,154
#51
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 373,989
#52
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,673,608
#53
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 210,844
#54
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 740,660
#55
БП онлайн
@bponline · 100,542
#56
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 277,957
#57
Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 238,664
#58
Пусси во вкусе
@pussivovkuse · 16,485
#59
НЕПРИНЦЕССА
@im_not_aprincess · 50,138
#60
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,099
#61
Win-Win
@victorstepanych · 156,126
#62
Принцесса Verandot
@princessaverandot · 54,891
#63
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 911,868
#64
Хуже и не скажешь
@badphrase · 52,759
#65
ЮЛИЯ МЕНЬШОВА
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 360,699
#66
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,094
#67
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 601,915
#68
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 35,079
#69
МИГ России
@mig41 · 474,153
#70
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 49,625
#71
москоутиндер
@moscowtinderr · 714,258
#72
Банкста
@banksta · 437,594
#73
Не последние люди в городе
@neposlednielyudi · 58,063
#74
Дядя Слава
@slavaded1337 · 461,697
#75
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,030,555
#76
Голос Мордора
@golosmordora1 · 149,009
#77
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 444,496
#78
Чекап избушки
@checkupizbushki · 5,740
#79
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,612,994
#80
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,009,296
#81
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,095,830
#82
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 251,416
#83
Ору, мисс!
@miss_oru · 64,382
#84
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,403
#85

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 21 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 51,225
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 69,134
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,257
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Wine O’Clock
@time_forwine · 49,124
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 26 August 2026
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 155,353
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 127,350
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Блокнот Старс
@bloknot_star · 127,183
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Woman.ru
@woman_ru · 48,961
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
Светские хроники
@SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 133,970
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,412
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 August 2026
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 112,014
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Самые СЛИВки
@samye_slyvky · 52,536
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
Алена Жигалова
@alenablin · 48,716
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Ору, мисс!
@miss_oru · 64,382
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 21 August 2026
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 181,002
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 49,625
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
ТОВАРИЩ СОРЯН
@TovarishchSoryan · 138,875
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 238,664
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 18 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“звездец какой-то” (@etzvezdets), 64,288 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/etzvezdets.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.