Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Самые СЛИВки

Channel

Самые СЛИВки

@samye_slyvky

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

52,235subscribers

-608 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001210280279
TypeChannel
Username@samye_slyvky
DescriptionНикакого пиетета к западным звездам. Голливуд плачет! 18+ По рекламе: @Slyvky_bot
Created31 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/samye_slyvky

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

52,23552,84352,5396 August 2026 — 52,843 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,827 subscribers7 August 2026 — 52,815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 52,797 subscribers9 August 2026 — 52,790 subscribers10 August 2026 — 52,777 subscribers11 August 2026 — 52,758 subscribers13 August 2026 — 52,740 subscribers14 August 2026 — 52,733 subscribers15 August 2026 — 52,704 subscribers17 August 2026 — 52,668 subscribers18 August 2026 — 52,658 subscribers19 August 2026 — 52,649 subscribers20 August 2026 — 52,639 subscribers21 August 2026 — 52,630 subscribers22 August 2026 — 52,624 subscribers24 August 2026 — 52,596 subscribers25 August 2026 — 52,579 subscribers26 August 2026 — 52,582 subscribers27 August 2026 — 52,553 subscribers28 August 2026 — 52,536 subscribers29 August 2026 — 52,525 subscribers30 August 2026 — 52,513 subscribers31 August 2026 — 52,495 subscribers1 September 2026 — 52,476 subscribers2 September 2026 — 52,461 subscribers3 September 2026 — 52,441 subscribers5 September 2026 — 52,422 subscribers9 September 2026 — 52,378 subscribers11 September 2026 — 52,340 subscribers13 September 2026 — 52,321 subscribers15 September 2026 — 52,294 subscribers17 September 2026 — 52,262 subscribers19 September 2026 — 52,235 subscribers6 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net -608. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,144–52,934 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 09:5452,235-27
17 Sept 2026, 01:1852,262-32
15 Sept 2026, 00:3752,294-27
13 Sept 2026, 11:1652,321-19
11 Sept 2026, 17:4252,340-38
9 Sept 2026, 07:3952,378-44
5 Sept 2026, 23:3952,422-19
3 Sept 2026, 21:3752,441-20
2 Sept 2026, 10:0452,461-15
1 Sept 2026, 09:4452,476-19
31 Aug 2026, 07:0452,495-18
30 Aug 2026, 05:3852,513-12
29 Aug 2026, 08:2752,525-11
28 Aug 2026, 08:0352,536-17
27 Aug 2026, 08:1352,553-29
26 Aug 2026, 06:4852,582+3
25 Aug 2026, 09:3352,579-17
24 Aug 2026, 06:5852,596-28
22 Aug 2026, 17:4452,624-6
21 Aug 2026, 10:1752,630first reading

Engagement

887 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
8.72%
avg views ÷ 52,235 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,550
555 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.25%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
555
of 887 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held887 (5 August 202623 September 2026)
Views total2,526,658
Reactions total56,791
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 16:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
18,900
Videos
5,650
Links
3,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3h 12m
Average length
28s

Measured directly from 408 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

90,165 reactions across 872 posts, in 67 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤮19,10921.2%
💩10,91812.1%
😁9,46410.5%
🤣9,43710.5%
7,6428.48%
🔥6,0026.66%
👍4,3094.78%
🤡3,8974.32%
💊3,6264.02%
🙈2,0402.26%
😱1,7111.90%
😢1,3531.50%
💯1,2991.44%
🍌1,2771.42%
🤯1,1661.29%
🥱6870.762%
🤬6620.734%
👏6040.67%
🦄5050.56%
👎4840.537%
47 further kinds3,9734.41%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 887 of the 887 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91,627 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 887 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 887 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @samye_slyvky. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 887 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 16:09 UTC783 views17 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

А вот и Памела Андерсон. Ее накрасили и посадили в мешок Мы в МАХ с новым названием

👍14🤮21

23 Sept 2026, 15:18 UTC≈1,400 views24 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Спасатели Малибу уже не те Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💩20🍌2🤣2

23 Sept 2026, 14:25 UTC≈1,930 views70 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Адриана Лима на Неделе моды в Милане намекает, что утянула глазки тугим хвостом. Но знающие люди разглядели у модели комплексную подтяжку. Ювелирная работа. В 45 выглядит на 20 лет младше Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🔥643🍌1💯1😱1

23 Sept 2026, 13:37 UTC≈2,470 views25 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Эта женщина утверждает, что потратила миллион долларов на пластику лица. Может, хирурги попутали? И вместа лица сделали пластику жопы? Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💩15👍4😁3💅2👻1

23 Sept 2026, 12:48 UTC≈2,820 views57 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Том Круз смачно облобызал Кейт Миддлтон, нарушив все протоколы в отношении монаршей особы Мы в МАХ с новым названием

31👏10🤡104🍌1🥰1

23 Sept 2026, 12:05 UTC≈3,230 views54 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Кстати, в реалити-шоу дети Самойловой признавались, что мамка никогда не берет на них трубки. Она вечно занята, ей никогда не дозвонишься. Интересно, как быстро она ответила детям в тот страшный день… Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤷‍♀30🤯13🤬7💔21🍌1

23 Sept 2026, 11:58 UTC≈3,270 views80 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Вот как в конце июля, спустя несколько недель после ЧП с Джиганом и заложниками, Оксана Самойлова комментировала отсутствие бывшего мужа на музыкальном фестивале. Блогерша со смехом сообщила, что у Джигана «есть веские причины отсутствовать». После такой жути смеяться на камеры? Даже не знаем, что это, слабоумие или отвага Мы в МАХ с новым названием

🤮66🤡12🍌1🥱1

23 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈3,480 views76 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

А тут Бьянка Цензори делится радостью. Совсем скоро мир увидит ее новую коллекцию "Прозрачные трусики из латекса". Можно экономить на презервативах Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💩40🤯14😁14💊71

23 Sept 2026, 11:08 UTC≈3,460 views35 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Оделась сама. Наорал Мы в МАХ с новым названием

😁194👎4👍2💩2🤣2🍌1🤬1

23 Sept 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,580 views29 reactionsread 23 September 2026

ну тут я вам честно скажу. что б нам понимать друг друга - не равняйте вот таких небожителей по простому народу. с этого семейства акционеры бабло гребут и дачи в майами покупают. джигана не посадят и к детям пустят и опять наркоту адреналиновую подсыпят только изза одной причины - самойловы реалити должно продолжаться что б дяди с них деньги гребли. такое у америкосов вообще норма вещей уже , это к нам только пришла

🤯262👍1

23 Sept 2026, 10:35 UTC≈3,680 views107 reactionsread 23 September 2026

то ли дело брухунова))) ей ваще не страшно детей с дедом оставлять, он даже если напьется до ружья точно не дойдет, и уж тем более его не поднимет. продуманка в косынке епрст)))

🤣92🔥6😁5👍21🤯1

23 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC≈3,890 views135 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Самойлову надо лишить родительских прав давно. Детей побросала и кутит по Европам в неглиже Мы в МАХ с новым названием

💯121👍6🥱51🍌1💩1

Showing the 12 most recent of 887 posts we hold for @samye_slyvky. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@samye_slyvky edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
23 September 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

11 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTCAnonymous Poll1,140 voters approx.

Инстасамка заявила, что не вернется в Россию из Дубая и будет штурмовать мировой шоу-бизнес хитами на english

  1. Ура! Скатертью дорожка57%
  2. Ждем в мировых чартах8%
  3. 100% попросится обратно23%
  4. Знавали мы таких рэперов…19%

The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 887 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 126,731
#1
Только никому...
@spletni_tg · 187,774
#2
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,364
#3
PEOPLETALK
@Peopletalkru · 182,678
#4
Пусси во вкусе
@pussivovkuse · 16,450
#5
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,689
#6
Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 49,651
#7
НЕБОЖЕНА
@imnotbozhena · 504,326
#8
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 180,817
#9
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#10
Администрация Аншлага
@klaragavrilovnanews · 157,156
#11
Mash
@mash · 3,096,804
#12
звездец какой-то
@etzvezdets · 64,136
#13
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,518
#14
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#15
SHOT
@shot_shot · 1,264,301
#16
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 154,461
#17
Бабская курилка
@kureelka · 124,870
#18
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,012,262
#19
Super.ru
@SuperRu · 196,663
#20
Вера в курсе
@verochkavkurse · 39,327
#21
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,880
#22
Героиня Татлера
@tatlersheroine · 100,724
#23
Diana Live
@dianalivelive · 42,924
#24
Новости Москвы
@moscowmap · 2,674,200
#25
Саваничи 🇷🇺
@savanichi · 194,356
#26
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 372,627
#27
СВЕЖЕСТИ
@svezhesti · 141,595
#28
Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 68,784
#29
YOBAJUR
@yobajur · 187,751
#30
Светские хроники
@SVETSKlE_HRONIKI · 133,552
#31
Лера Кудрявцева
@lerakudryavtseva · 237,112
#32
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 49,233
#33
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 355,464
#34
Светский интроверт
@svintrovert · 84,110
#35
Вероника Степанова
@veronikastepanova20011 · 474,884
#36
Дорогая Хурма
@expensive_hurma · 151,626
#37
НЕПРИНЦЕССА
@im_not_aprincess · 50,044
#38
ШАХНАЗАРОВ
@iikhu · 155,063
#39
Хуже и не скажешь
@badphrase · 52,586
#40
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 104,034
#41
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,013
#42
Бочарик (ага, тот самый)
@botcharov · 210,518
#43
🐍МОСКВИЧКА🐍
@glavmoskvichka · 34,961
#44
Maisto
@igormaisto · 103,538
#45
Noomba
@noombaru · 14,969
#46
Каждой твари - кампари
@tvrkmpr · 22,772
#47
Прямой Эфир • Новости
@novosti_efir · 3,956,254
#48
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#49
ZERGULIO
@SergeyKolyasnikov · 453,998
#50
Zлой Пруф️
@proofzzz · 610,821
#51
Ньюсач/Двач
@ru2ch · 650,396
#52
Звезданулись
@ebanulisnews · 8,035
#53
Звездная пыль
@starsdustpro · 29,426
#54
Темы. Главное (ГлавМедиа)
@glavmedia · 66,679
#55
Старше Эдды
@vysokygovorit · 488,324
#56
ЮЛИЯ МЕНЬШОВА
@JuliaMenshovaJulia · 359,204
#57
Mash на Мойке
@mashmoyka · 342,545
#58
Комсомольская правда: KP.RU
@truekpru · 285,688
#59
КОНТЕКСТ
@kontext_channel · 838,100
#60
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,245
#61
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#62
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#63
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 649,498
#64
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#65
Анатолий Шарий
@asupersharij · 1,700,527
#66
СОЛОВЬЁВ
@solovievlive · 1,101,856
#67
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 567,568
#68
Colonelcassad
@boris_rozhin · 747,495
#69
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка"
@yurasumy · 2,672,095
#70
Милитарист
@infantmilitario · 277,659
#71
112
@ENews112 · 364,796
#72
МИГ России
@mig41 · 480,324
#73
Резидент
@rezident_ua · 937,082
#74
Украина.ру
@ukr_2025_ru · 494,202
#75
Два майора
@dva_majors · 1,168,837
#76
Двач
@dvachannel · 938,773
#77
ЗеРада
@zerada1 · 425,490
#78
Голос Мордора
@golosmordora1 · 148,807
#79
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 905,528
#80
Tynu40k Goblina (oper.ru)
@oper_goblin · 494,224
#81
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,578
#82
Москвач • Новости Москвы
@moscowach · 4,111,005
#83
Банкста
@banksta · 438,140
#84
Осторожно, Москва
@ostorozhno_moskva · 391,203
#85
Абзац
@absatzmedia · 132,141
#86
Операция Z: Военкоры Русской Весны
@rvvoenkor · 1,459,285
#87
Kotsnews
@sashakots · 474,029
#88
Москва 24
@infomoscow24 · 486,177
#89
Легитимный
@legitimniy · 1,029,288
#90

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

НеМалахов
@nemalahov · 126,731
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Голубь Мира Яна Рудковская
@doveoftheworld · 60,828
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Говорящая Тыква
@talking_pumpkin · 32,364
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
BLITZ+
@blitzplus · 31,024
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
ФСН 🐞 OFFICIAL️
@fsnonline · 39,545
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Светский хроник
@svetskyhronik · 47,689
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
Woman.ru
@woman_ru · 48,615
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 26 August 2026
Вера в курсе
@verochkavkurse · 39,327
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 August 2026
Звездная пыль
@starsdustpro · 29,426
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 September 2026
Makakaizmanaka News
@makakaizmanakanews · 21,713
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 September 2026
СЕЛЕБРИТИ
@selebrty · 23,498
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 September 2026
Анастасия Волочкова
@volochkova_anastasiya · 25,658
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 13 September 2026
Тулуп Тутберидзе
@tuluptut · 49,651
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Жёлтая утка
@zheltayautka · 36,338
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 5 September 2026
Starhit.ru
@starhitru · 104,034
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Diana Live
@dianalivelive · 42,924
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
Медиа хабалки
@MediaHabalki · 49,233
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 25 August 2026
Дорогая редакция
@dorogayare · 40,121
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 5 September 2026
Алёна, Блин!
@neopra_blin · 154,461
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
Новости Шоу-Бизнеса
@novostishowbiz · 164,050
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 12 August 2026
звездец какой-то
@etzvezdets · 64,136
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 21 August 2026
Коза кричала
@kozakrichala · 180,817
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 68,784
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Горячие новости шоу-бизнеса
@novosti_zvezd_showbiz · 66,770
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 49 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Самые СЛИВки” (@samye_slyvky), 52,235 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/samye_slyvky.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.