International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
63 measurements spanning 95 days, net +6,821. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 458,192–474,105 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 63
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 11:10
470,440
-105
7 Nov 2026, 05:58
470,545
-72
6 Nov 2026, 07:34
470,617
+781
5 Nov 2026, 05:30
469,836
-67
4 Nov 2026, 02:01
469,903
+9
2 Nov 2026, 23:06
469,894
-49
1 Nov 2026, 21:34
469,943
-64
1 Nov 2026, 00:01
470,007
-68
30 Oct 2026, 22:35
470,075
-41
29 Oct 2026, 21:48
470,116
-99
28 Oct 2026, 20:39
470,215
-88
27 Oct 2026, 21:20
470,303
-124
26 Oct 2026, 22:55
470,427
-107
25 Oct 2026, 19:38
470,534
-99
24 Oct 2026, 16:40
470,633
-115
23 Oct 2026, 17:00
470,748
-96
22 Oct 2026, 14:09
470,844
-119
21 Oct 2026, 08:10
470,963
-106
20 Oct 2026, 07:59
471,069
-134
19 Oct 2026, 08:10
471,203
first reading
Engagement
2,600 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 190 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.00%
avg views ÷ 470,440 subscribers
Avg views / post
37,600
891 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
891
of 2,600 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
2,600 (5 August 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
33,534,852
Reactions total
996,213
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 01:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 32m
Average length
33s
Measured directly from 384 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,121,065 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤡
214,172
19.1%
🤣
211,829
18.9%
👍
209,742
18.7%
🤬
131,949
11.8%
😁
127,169
11.3%
🔥
90,972
8.11%
🤮
56,205
5.01%
❤
50,738
4.53%
😢
28,289
2.52%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,121,065 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
354
across the posts below
Posts paid on
114
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
136
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slavaded1337. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
0.1%
1 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
45,600
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
38,700
over 999 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VtzqvoGAi1
1
5 October 2026
5 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 October 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 674 of 891 posts held from the last 30 days (75.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
❗️Шеврон американской ЧВК, связанной с наёмниками на Украине, обнаружили у польского террориста, устроившего массовый расстрел в Кракове
Польский стрелок носил шеврон американской ЧВК Forward Observations Group (FOG), которую связывают с иностранными наёмниками, участвовавшими в боевых действиях на стороне Украины.
Именно такой шеврон был на его бронежилете, который нашли в машине. Сейчас выясняется, был ли террори…
"Пить до потери сознания".
Рютте признался, что мечтает устроить алкогольную вечеринку с Зеленским после окончания конфликта на Украине.
"Мы напьемся вдрызг где-нибудь в швейцарских Альпах. Сядем на вершине и будем пить до потери сознания. Таков наш план", - заявил он в эфире телепередачи Pauw & De Wit.
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
❗️Трамп предложил привлечь Хабиба Нурмагомедова и Ислама Махачева к работе пресс-службы Белого дома в качестве помощников пресс-секретаря
Также президент США рассказал, что предлагал главе UFC Дане Уайту занять пост пресс-секретаря Белого дома
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
Массовые задержания проходят на Китай-Городе в Москве: приехало больше 10 автозаков
СМИ сообщают, что к парку «Горка» в Большом Спасоглинищевском переулке подъехало больше 10 автозаков. Находящихся в парке и около местных баров задерживает полиция.
По данным самих задержанных, их так много, что «в автозаке нечем дышать». Причины, по которым задерживают молодых людей, неизвестны.
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
⚡️Демократы в США готовят новый пакет помощи Украине на $15 миллиардов — FT
Средства хотят направить на поддержку украинской ПВО и энергетики этой зимой.
Также демократы готовят расследования в отношении Илона Маска, Уиткоффа и Кушнера из-за их действий и деловых интересов.
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
Траур до 11 ноября объявлен в польском Кракове после стрельбы, в которой погибли как минимум шесть человек, сообщил мэр города Лукаш Гибала.
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
Экс-депутат Госдумы написал в комментариях в интернете, что «не даст пососать свой писюн» недостаточно красивой россиянке
Всё из-за того, что она, по его словам, «с лишним жиром».
Как сообщила СМИ танцовщица из Волгодонска, она выложила видео с танцами, под которым 55-летний Олег Пахолков, экс-депутат Госдумы, оставил такой комментарий:
Столько лишнего жира и отсутствия женственности. Такой страшно писюнчик показы…
❗️В России значительно усилили блокировки VPN — СМИ
Отлетать начали даже личные серверы на 2-3 человека, которые люди делали не для продажи, а для себя — ТСПУ ловят их за считанные часы
Новые VPN банят сразу после того, как их регистрируют, а старые VPN приходится перенастраивать каждые пару дней
Причиной называют то, что в работу подключили ИИ, который вычисляет подозрительный трафик
А у нас с самого начала блок…
Путин готов к энергетическому перемирию в декабре и мирному соглашению весной 2027 года — Гордон
Гордон со ссылкой на источники раскрыл предполагаемые условия Москвы для завершения конфликта.
Россия, по его словам, готова прекратить боевые действия по нынешней линии фронта и заключить энергетическое перемирие уже в декабре, а также перейти к мирному соглашению весной 2027 года и допустить размещение миротворцев на …
❗️Устроивший теракт в Кракове — гражданин Польши, сообщила польская полиция
Силовики также опровергли заявление о сообщнике.
Подписаться. - TG | MAX
🤬419😁53👍20🤡14❤3🤮2🤣1
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,600 posts we hold for @slavaded1337. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@slavaded1337 edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
1 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 143 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 69 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Мир сегодня с "Юрий Подоляка" @yurasumy · 2,664,351#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
ВЕЖЛИВЫЕ💥 ЛЮДИ 🇷🇺РОССИИ🇷🇺 @Tama_tv_Life · 27,522 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Денис Шалюта, блогер из Сибири @shalyuta · 42,227 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 29 August 2026
Nina VATT 🇷🇺 @ninavatt90 · 77,768 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
Петя Первый @Petya_perviy · 251,877 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
Мяу @pomeukai · 23,031 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 September 2026
msk_53 @msk_53 · 24,171 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 September 2026
polnayaanarxiya @polnayaanarxiya · 31 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 6 September 2026
WALK&TALK @walkandtalke · 57,135 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
РАГУЛЯКУ НА ГЫЛЯКУ ™ @ragulaku · 58,566 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
Батькович @batka_ru · 83,812 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Колхоз дело добровольное Руслан @kolxozdelodobrovolnoeRUS · 96,975 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 16 August 2026
Zuben_co Новости @zuben_co · 119,460 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Дядька Гарри @UnknownWitnessTV · 20,263 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 27 September 2026
ТриДевятое Царство 👑 @Carstvo_39 · 36,324 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 1 September 2026
Реалист Реальный @RealistRealni · 23,000 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 19 September 2026
Zлой Пруф️ @proofzzz · 606,388 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 August 2026
Мужик из 90-х🇷🇺 @man_90x · 34,252 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
Михаил Советский @mihail_sovetskij · 101,552 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
ТОПОР 18+ @Voina_zhest_novosty_video · 124,649 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Новости NЕ.САХАР Live @novosti_ne_sakhar · 63,096 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 September 2026
Прямой Эфир @ROSSIA_PUTIN · 65,497 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 September 2026
СРОЧНО И ТОЧНО - дайджест новостей @russia24h · 19,663 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 29 September 2026
Николай Дульский. Официальный канал НКО «Формат 45» @DulskiyN · 27,529 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 September 2026
Zanoza @Zanoza_yana · 23,766 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 17 September 2026
This channel appears in 381 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Дядя Слава” (@slavaded1337), 470,440 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slavaded1337.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
