Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бродский 🖋

Channel

Бродский 🖋

@brodsky_tg

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,167subscribers

+6 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001968117887
TypeChannel
Username@brodsky_tg
DescriptionЗаявление в РКН № 5605076991 Канал о любимом поэте, Иосифе Бродском Канал Сергея Довлатова - @dovlatov_sergei По рекламе: @anna_peterburg Реклама на бирже: https://telega.in/c/brodsky_tg
Created21 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held55
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/brodsky_tg

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,10411,21011,1576 August 2026 — 11,161 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,182 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,199 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,201 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,206 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,210 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,204 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,198 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,199 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,197 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,200 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,194 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,191 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,190 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,189 subscribers22 August 2026 — 11,185 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,180 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,176 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,175 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,170 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,168 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,169 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,165 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,161 subscribers2 September 2026 — 11,159 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,165 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,158 subscribers10 September 2026 — 11,153 subscribers12 September 2026 — 11,147 subscribers14 September 2026 — 11,144 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,145 subscribers27 September 2026 — 11,137 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,128 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,110 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,111 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,105 subscribers18 October 2026 — 11,106 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,104 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,105 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,104 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,113 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,109 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,105 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,150 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,156 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,153 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,161 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,160 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,163 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,167 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,166 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,168 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,169 subscribers5 November 2026 — 11,170 subscribers7 November 2026 — 11,167 subscribers11,1676 August 20267 November 2026
55 measurements spanning 93 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,088–11,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 55
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 12:2611,167-3
5 Nov 2026, 13:2811,170+1
4 Nov 2026, 13:3411,169+1
3 Nov 2026, 11:3611,168+2
2 Nov 2026, 14:4611,166-1
1 Nov 2026, 12:1511,167+4
31 Oct 2026, 14:3011,163+3
30 Oct 2026, 13:5911,160-1
29 Oct 2026, 17:1711,161+8
28 Oct 2026, 15:4811,153-3
27 Oct 2026, 12:5711,156+6
26 Oct 2026, 10:3711,150+45
24 Oct 2026, 08:3511,105-4
23 Oct 2026, 11:1411,109-4
22 Oct 2026, 13:1711,113+9
21 Oct 2026, 09:3911,104-1
20 Oct 2026, 04:4811,105+1
19 Oct 2026, 01:5911,104-2
18 Oct 2026, 01:0111,106+1
17 Oct 2026, 01:2111,105first reading

Engagement

135 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.7%
avg views ÷ 11,167 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.02%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 135 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held135 (30 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total46,797
Reactions total2,347
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 20:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,100
Videos
≈97
Links
≈3,370

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 01s
Average length
1m 01s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

9,079 reactions across 135 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤5,72263.0%
❤‍🔥8038.84%
👏7458.21%
💔5936.53%
👍4755.23%
🔥3163.48%
😢1581.74%
🕊820.903%
😁820.903%
🤣580.639%
🙏390.43%
🤩60.066%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 135 of the 135 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 135 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 33 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC515 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Скука – наиболее распространенная черта существования. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤20👏8❤‍🔥4👍2😢1

7 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC691 views35 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Жизнь, дружок, не изба ведь. Но об этом — молчок, чтоб другим не во вред (всюду уши: и справа, и слева). Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤21👍10❤‍🔥4

7 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC961 views64 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Любовь, в общем, приходит со скоростью света; разрыв - со скоростью звука. Падение скорости от большей к меньшей и увлажняет глаз. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤41❤‍🔥14👍9

6 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,040 views66 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Объясняйте это как хотите, но в Петербурге есть эта загадка – он действительно влияет на твою душу, формирует ее. Человека, там выросшего или, по крайней мере, проведшего там свою молодость, - его с другими людьми, как мне кажется, трудно спутать. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤49👏8💔5❤‍🔥3🤣1

6 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,290 views74 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Есть мистика. Есть вера. Есть Господь. Есть разница меж них. И есть единство. Одним вредит, других спасает плоть. Неверье - слепота, а чаще - свинство. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤‍🔥46❤16🔥12

6 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,150 views50 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Отношение один к одному не оправдывает усилий: гораздо важнее эхо. Поэтому гоните или глушите эхо, не позволяйте событию, каким бы неприятным или значительным оно ни было, занимать больше времени, чем ему потребовалось, чтобы произойти. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤36👍8❤‍🔥5👏1

5 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,230 views60 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Так окрикни меня. Мастерица кричать и ругать. Так окрикни меня. Так легко малыша напугать. Так окрикни меня. Не то сам я сейчас закричу… Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤‍🔥25❤18💔12👍5

5 Nov 2026, 12:00 UTC≈1,260 views99 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Я сижу у окна. Я помыл посуду. Я был счастлив здесь, и уже не буду. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤58❤‍🔥19💔13👍6👏3

5 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,240 views61 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Если ты выбрал нечто, привлекающее других, это означает определенную вульгарность вкуса. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤38👏14😁5❤‍🔥3🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,320 views88 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Индивидуум должен игнорировать обстоятельства.Пока есть такой язык, как русский, поэзия неизбежна. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤‍🔥49❤27🔥6👏5👍1

4 Nov 2026, 06:00 UTC≈1,480 views73 reactionsread 7 November 2026

Я был только тем, чего ты касалась ладонью, над чем в глухую, воронью ночь склоняла чело. Я был лишь тем, что ты там, внизу, различала: смутный облик сначала, много позже — черты. ... Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤50🔥19👏4

3 Nov 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,670 views99 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Жить просто: надо только понимать, что есть люди, которые лучше тебя. Это очень облегчает жизнь. Иосиф Бродский 🖋️

❤70👏18👍11

Showing the 12 most recent of 135 posts we hold for @brodsky_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @brodsky_tg as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стихи давно забытого поэта
@memoryofpoets · 93,234
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
М. Жванецкий
@jvanetskyy · 25,824
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 September 2026
Читал, но забыл | Литература
@literary_tg · 18,648
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 October 2026
Открытые письма | Литература
@open_letters · 40,650
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026
Лучшие стихи великих поэтов | Литература
@mypoetry · 59,095
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 22 August 2026
Ироничная библиотека
@ironi4naya · 31,746
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 6 September 2026
Петербургские истории 🎞
@piter_places · 44,771
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Фаина Раневская
@Ranevskaya_tsitaty_teatr · 30,280
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Эрих Мария Ремарк
@remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,778
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 September 2026
Жизнь в дневниках
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 164,596
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Пейзаж на холсте | Галерея
@kartiny_tg · 67,352
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 20 August 2026
Вечная философия
@tim_philosophy · 67,164
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
Московские истории 🎞
@msk_stories · 20,767
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 September 2026
Карл Густав Юнг
@Jung_tsitaty_psyhoIogia · 63,254
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Немецкая философия
@deutschephilosophiee · 27,618
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бродский 🖋” (@brodsky_tg), 11,167 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/brodsky_tg.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.