Неразрешимый вопрос, сломлен ли я? Гибну ли я? Все признаки говорят за это (холод, отупение, состояние нервов, рассеянность, неспособность к работе, головные боли, бессонница); почти единственное, что говорит против этого, — надежда. Дневник, 7 октября 1915 г. Франц Кафка

Channel
Немецкая философия
@deutschephilosophiee
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
27,833subscribers
-114 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001259131279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @deutschephilosophiee |
| Description | Единственный действующий канал, посвященный самому влиятельному направлению в философии. По всем вопросам: @zubar89 Канал включён в перечень РКН: https://rkn.link/xlB |
| Created | 22 May 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/deutschephilosophiee |
Topic
Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
Recorded in 2019 as “Немецкая философия | Политика” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 08:36 | 27,833 | -12 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:00 | 27,845 | -9 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:20 | 27,854 | -4 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:35 | 27,858 | -2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 09:01 | 27,860 | -21 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 04:15 | 27,881 | -2 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 27,883 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 17:43 | 27,887 | -2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 15:35 | 27,889 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:44 | 27,895 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 27,897 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 27,899 | -13 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 14:32 | 27,912 | -129 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 28,041 | +103 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 17:48 | 27,938 | +12 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:44 | 27,926 | -7 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 02:57 | 27,933 | -1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 27,934 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 13:43 | 27,931 | -5 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:38 | 27,936 | first reading |
Engagement
69 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 9.37%
- avg views ÷ 27,833 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 2,610
- 28 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 28
- of 69 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (17 July 2026 – 24 September 2026) |
| Views total | 73,060 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 24 Sept 2026, 18:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈31
- Links
- ≈4,030
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
Тот, кто борется с чудовищами, должен следить за собой, чтобы самому не обратиться в чудовище. Попробуй подолгу смотреть в пропасть, и она заглянет тебе в глаза. Фридрих #Ницше «По ту сторону добра и зла»
С человеком происходит то же, что и с деревом. Чем больше стремится он вверх, к свету, тем глубже уходят корни его в землю, вниз, в мрак и глубину — ко злу. Фридрих #Ницше
«Где я находил живое, там находил я и волю к власти; и даже в воле слуги — и там я находил волю стать владыкой». «Что сильнейшему должно служить слабейшее, в этом слабейшее убеждается своей волей, стремящейся стать владыкой над ещё слабейшим: одной лишь этой радости не согласно оно лишиться». «И как меньшее отдаётся большему, чтобы самому властвовать над ещё меньшим и радоваться о нём: так и самое великое в свою оч…
Встреча двух личностей подобна контакту двух химических веществ: если есть хоть малейшая реакция, изменяются оба элемента Карл Густав #Юнг
Представь себе - однажды днем или, быть может, ночью тебя в твоем уединеннейшем уединении нежданно посетил бы злой дух и сказал бы тебе: "Эту жизнь, которую ты сейчас живешь и жил доныне, тебе придется прожить еще раз,а потом еще и еще, до бесконечности; и в ней не будет ничего нового, но каждое страдание, и каждое удовольствие, и каждая мысль, и каждый вздох, и все мельчайшие мелочи, и все несказанно великое твоей ж…
Я пишу иначе, чем говорю, говорю иначе, чем думаю, думаю иначе, чем должен думать, и так до самых темных глубин. Франц #Кафка
Пусть чередуются весь век Счастливый рок и рок несчастный. В неутомимости всечасной Себя находит человек. Иоганн Вольфганг #Гёте
Мы так охотно остаемся на лоне природы, потому что она не имеет мнения о нас. Фридрих #Ницше
Кто свободен от предрассудков, должен быть готов к тому, что его не поймут. Лион #Фейхтвангер
Смелые мысли играют роль передовых шашек в игре; они гибнут, но обеспечивают победу. Иоганн Вольфганг фон #Гёте
Прекрасное — это символ морального добра. Иммануил #Кант
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @deutschephilosophiee. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Nietzsche_tsitaty_filosofia · 17,760#1
@tim_philosophy · 67,686#2
@fromm_tg · 8,467#3
@tsitaty_mudroe_slovo · 36,508#4
@Uber_mench · 4,856#5
@AphorismTG · 107,912#6
@stoicismway · 1,787#7
@EduPhilosophy · 8,473#8
@Jung_tsitaty_psyhoIogia · 63,822#9
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 165,339#10
@slovar_psikhologia · 83,517#11
@ThinkCritical · 47,236#12
@tg_Philosophy · 8,610#13
@existgram · 3,339#14
@PsyEducation · 59,345#15
@cult_code · 11,187#16
@Schopenhauer_tsitaty_filosofia · 9,140#17
@Sprache_D · 5,468#18
@kafkanazavtrak · 7,127#19
@runawayfromme · 12,837#20
@knigi_literatura · 260,681#21
@FactTG · 217#22
@dwrussian · 50,743#23
@remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,925#24
@viktorpelevin · 32,177#25
@philosophicaI_thoughts · 121,594#26
@b_quotes · 14,840#27
@deutschonline · 122,702#28
@philosophycafemoscow · 13,974#29
@insolarance · 11,333#30
@slysh_erudit · 17,664#31
@free_edu · 309,050#32
@SilaSlov · 118,203#33
@knifemedia · 101,812#34
@verba2 · 4,331#35
@ruGrammar · 121,218#36
@learngerm · 31,263#37
@tolstoy_life · 59,873#38
@vchistina · 13,509#39
@kartiny_muzei_zhivopis · 121,510#40
@kafkafranzzz · 5,295#41
@velnotes · 2,211#42
@Jung_life · 9,440#43
@stylishgerman · 50,011#44
@TajnuSoznanija · 15,826#45
@ViktorFrankl_tg · 4,769#46
@ologyy · 16,567#47
@aeternitas · 294#48
@psycanal · 17,213#49
@nevzorovtv · 1,019,614#50
@shevchenkomax_1 · 117,139#51
@stalin_gulag · 300,961#52
@fuckingenglish · 312,495#53
@NationGeographic · 325,560#54
@tolk_tolk · 125,994#55
@goetheinstituttaschkent · 11,640#56
@mycosmos · 131,200#57
@history_0o · 329,765#58
@economika · 143,492#59
@feelings_shower · 53,577#60
@kosmostime · 63,555#61
@world_rk · 5,272#62
@viveconesto · 54,033#63
@Black_History · 93,754#64
@jungiannotes · 1,175#65
@Sandymustache · 212,050#66
@Kino_iskusstvo_vintazh · 89,271#67
@Agitblog · 109,337#68
@malekdudakov · 82,833#69
@daokedao · 99,214#70
@lektorium20 · 115,168#71
@historygothy · 20,829#72
@pornstat · 32,841#73
@funscience · 34,434#74
@proeconomics · 68,378#75
@books_sklad · 4,190#76
@elonmusk_ru · 60,846#77
@pic_history · 50,003#78
@hzvse · 34,780#79
@brodsky_tg · 11,145#80
@captainpaleo · 52,123#81
@flibusta_anglysky · 369,621#82
@kartiny2 · 71,536 (as read 10 September 2026)#83
@cmd_cv · 53,630#84
@blue_canvas · 925#85
@latinpopacanski · 23,554#86
@blogutbanov · 744#87
@incognitonik · 6,898#88
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 10 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@tim_philosophy · 67,686
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 20 August 2026
@slovar_psikhologia · 83,517
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
@PsyEducation · 59,345
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
@skachat_chitat_besplatno · 89,815
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
@ThinkCritical · 47,236
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
@SilaSlov · 118,203
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
@ikyklovod · 70,004
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
@doc_Filatov · 28,103
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 10 September 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Немецкая философия” (@deutschephilosophiee), 27,833 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deutschephilosophiee.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.