Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for вчемсуть

Channel

вчемсуть

@vchistina

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,844subscribers

+843 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001850870025
TypeChannel
Username@vchistina
DescriptionЛайфстайл-медиа о философии 🔸Boosty: boosty.to/vchm 📙 Книга: taplink.cc/istina_book Написать лично мне (Макс Неаполитанский): @hi_sio Для рекламы: @daniil_avd Перечень РКН: clck.ru/3RGtYx
Created26 October 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held57
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vchistina

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

12,99813,85013,4246 August 2026 — 13,001 subscribers6 August 2026 — 12,998 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,005 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,013 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,045 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,076 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,080 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,095 subscribers14 August 2026 — 13,102 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,104 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,099 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,094 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,097 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,094 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,108 subscribers22 August 2026 — 13,130 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,178 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,191 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,203 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,224 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,244 subscribers30 August 2026 — 13,239 subscribers31 August 2026 — 13,246 subscribers1 September 2026 — 13,242 subscribers2 September 2026 — 13,246 subscribers3 September 2026 — 13,243 subscribers5 September 2026 — 13,256 subscribers8 September 2026 — 13,282 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,301 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,313 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,337 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,401 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,467 subscribers25 September 2026 — 13,509 subscribers4 October 2026 — 13,713 subscribers8 October 2026 — 13,765 subscribers13 October 2026 — 13,772 subscribers14 October 2026 — 13,776 subscribers15 October 2026 — 13,774 subscribers16 October 2026 — 13,782 subscribers17 October 2026 — 13,787 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,791 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,792 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,799 subscribers21 October 2026 — 13,805 subscribers23 October 2026 — 13,811 subscribers24 October 2026 — 13,818 subscribers25 October 2026 — 13,813 subscribers26 October 2026 — 13,802 subscribers27 October 2026 — 13,803 subscribers28 October 2026 — 13,802 subscribers29 October 2026 — 13,797 subscribers31 October 2026 — 13,803 subscribers2 November 2026 — 13,842 subscribers3 November 2026 — 13,848 subscribers4 November 2026 — 13,850 subscribers6 November 2026 — 13,844 subscribers13,8446 August 20266 November 2026
57 measurements spanning 93 days, net +843. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,870–13,978 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 57
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 18:2713,844-6
4 Nov 2026, 21:1113,850+2
3 Nov 2026, 21:4513,848+6
2 Nov 2026, 22:3413,842+39
31 Oct 2026, 23:4913,803+6
29 Oct 2026, 19:4913,797-5
28 Oct 2026, 16:4813,802-1
27 Oct 2026, 13:4513,803+1
26 Oct 2026, 14:1113,802-11
25 Oct 2026, 16:0613,813-5
24 Oct 2026, 15:2613,818+7
23 Oct 2026, 15:5813,811+6
21 Oct 2026, 10:0913,805+6
20 Oct 2026, 11:1913,799+7
19 Oct 2026, 12:1613,792+1
18 Oct 2026, 14:0613,791+4
17 Oct 2026, 16:0713,787+5
16 Oct 2026, 13:3613,782+8
15 Oct 2026, 15:0413,774-2
14 Oct 2026, 13:3913,776first reading

Engagement

34 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 13,844 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,690
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.52%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 34 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held34 (22 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total36,880
Reactions total929
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Nov 2026, 18:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,980
Videos
≈2
Links
≈157

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

3,202 reactions across 34 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,43944.9%
🔥63719.9%
😁32710.2%
❤‍🔥2176.78%
✍1364.25%
👍1294.03%
😎320.999%
🤯290.906%
🥰270.843%
😍260.812%
🙏260.812%
💘250.781%
⚡230.718%
👏180.562%
😱180.562%
🕊160.5%
🤣150.468%
🦄110.344%
💯90.281%
💅70.219%
10 further kinds351.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 34 of the 34 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 34 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 34 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @vchistina. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 34 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (30.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 17:00 UTC≈1,480 views28 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Рассказываем про дополнительный набор на курс «Высшей школы английского» → Старт новых участников — с 23 по 29 ноября. Занятия онлайн, уровни B2–C2. О чём курс Программа изучения английского языка через чтение и обсуждение современных гуманитарных материалов. Основное внимание уделяется разговорной практике, расширению словарного запаса и работе с грамматикой. Курс состоит из девяти тематических модулей, поэтому пр…

❤14🔥7👍3🤯2😢2

5 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC≈2,230 views87 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Как нервы стали духом времени и навсегда изменили культуру? → В конце 19 века европейцы всё чаще жаловались на бессонницу, раздражительность, нервное истощение, постоянную спешку, врачи называли это неврастенией, но феномен оказался шире. Наступила эпоха нервов. Историк Йоахим Радкау в книге «Эпоха нервозности» исследует, как эта болезнь стала одной из главных черт культуры Европы в 20 веке. Рассказываем, как это бы…

❤50❤‍🔥16🔥13👍5💯3

4 Nov 2026, 12:54 UTC≈2,650 views54 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Лекция Макса Неаполитанского. Дружба — новая роскошь? Лекция о кризисе культуры близости → 10 ноября, вторник, 19:00, Санкт-Петербург, ул. Марата, 60/7. Купить билеты О чем лекция За последние десятилетия сильно изменились наши способы дружить и быть вместе в целом. Общую повседневность всё чаще заменяют рабочие встречи. Культ продуктивности отнимает время на общение, а социальные сети превращают чужие успехи в пов…

❤34🔥13🥰5🤯2

31 Oct 2026, 15:01 UTC≈3,880 views189 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Что пугает тех, кто изучает философию? Представили самые страшные костюмы на этот Хэллоуин для ценителей философии.

😁94🔥54❤27😭6😱5👏2🤓1

30 Oct 2026, 19:10 UTC≈4,060 views159 reactions2 Starsread 7 November 2026
Photo

«Как жить вместе» Ролана Барта: как работает искусство близости? → В 1977 году Барт прочитал в Коллеж де Франс курс лекций «Как жить вместе», который потом вышел отдельной книгой. Барта интересовал вопрос, как люди могут находиться рядом, сохраняя собственную независимость, однако за этой темой стояла вполне философская проблематика. Почему Барта заинтересовала жизнь в монастыре? Отправной точкой стала история мона…

❤97👍27❤‍🔥25🔥9✍1

28 Oct 2026, 15:30 UTC≈3,240 views38 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Рассказываем о новом проекте наших друзей из канала Salve, Latina! — курсе латинского языка → Старт 31 октября. Занятия по субботам в 10:30 (мск), онлайн в Zoom. О чём курс Изучение латинского языка через знакомство с литературой, историей и культурой — от античности до эпохи Возрождения. Особое внимание уделяется грамматике, структуре языка, анализу текстов и практике общения на латыни. Что входит в программу • и…

❤16🔥12✍5👍3🤣1😍1

25 Oct 2026, 15:29 UTC≈3,900 views88 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Кант критикует высокомерие философов и призывает не боятся публичного слова в философии → Интересная цитата из статьи «О вельможном тоне, недавно возникшем в философии»: Слово философия, утратив свое первоначальное значение науки о жизненной мудрости, стало весьма рано пользоваться спросом как украшение мышления оригинальных мыслителей, которым оно представляет­ся теперь чем-то вроде ключа к тайне. Аскетам в Ма…

❤‍🔥39❤26🔥20🙏2💋1

15 Oct 2026, 14:00 UTC≈6,430 views125 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня юбилей Мишеля Фуко — французскому философу исполнилось бы ровно сто лет. Рассказываем о его главных работах Что почитать у Фуко, как не потеряться в его многочисленных текстах, для этого сделали такой гайд: здесь только основные работы Фуко, без курсов лекций и сборников статей. Так начать проще — можно взять «Историю безумия» и оказаться в мультивселенной Фуко почти с самого момента ее создания.

❤77🔥25💘16👍3👨‍💻2🎃1🙏1

14 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈5,090 views74 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

Что почитать, чтобы понять суть активного нигилизма? → Подборка интересных текстов (и ссылок на них), чтобы разобраться, в чем же состоит суть активного нигилизма, о котором писал Ницше в «Воле к власти» Фридрих Ницше «Об истине и лжи во вненравственном смысле» Мастер-класс по выстукиванию молотом, где h — сам язык, эта «движущаяся толпа метафор, метонимий, антропоморфизмов», которую мы по привычке используем для п…

🔥37❤24🦄7❤‍🔥3🤯2🙏1

13 Oct 2026, 19:05 UTC≈3,920 views87 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Бывает, купишь новый телефон или компьютер, вроде всё нравится, но через время всё равно приходит разочарование. Такая же история случилась с Ницше и флагманской печатной машинкой → Необычная история о том, как Фридрих Ницше получил в подарок одну из самых редких печатных машинок XIX века (на фото) — «пишущий шар», и вот как она повлияла на его философию. С чего всё началось К тому времени зрение Ницше настолько ух…

✍31🔥26❤23⚡2👍2🙏2💯1

7 Oct 2026, 18:00 UTC≈4,710 views125 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Жиль Делез о том, как прочитать хороший курс лекций → Курс — это словно исследовательская лаборатория: лекционный курс определяется тем, что ищут, а не тем, что известно. Следует долгое время готовиться, чтобы получить несколько минут вдохновения. Мне приходилось останавливаться, когда я видел, что мне нужно еще готовиться, чтобы получить более мучительное вдохновение. И будущее окутано мраком, потому что становится…

❤71❤‍🔥28✍17💯5👍2🔥2

6 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC≈4,790 views70 reactions1 Starread 4 November 2026
Photo

Почему в современном обществе механизмы потребления всё больше напоминают казино? → Отвечаем с помощью Жана Бодрийяра, как розыгрыши, колёса фортуны и случайные призы захватили современные маркетплейсы и почему покупка товаров всё больше похожа на поход в казино. Нашли ответ в книге «Соблазн». Что такое азартные игры для Бодрийяра? Начнём с базового момента: азартная игра интересует Бодрийяра не как способ выиграть…

❤47👍11🔥8😱4

Showing the 12 most recent of 34 posts we hold for @vchistina. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@vchistina edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @vchistina as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
9 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

4я книга Науки Логики
@starpear1724 · 22,226
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
Латынь по-пацански
@latinpopacanski · 23,647
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 September 2026
Немецкая философия
@deutschephilosophiee · 27,618
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 September 2026
PhilosophyToday
@Philosophytoday · 19,756
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 30 September 2026
Книжные Подборки
@knizhnye_podborki · 22,665
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“вчемсуть” (@vchistina), 13,844 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vchistina.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.