Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пробел

Channel

Пробел

@probelphilosophy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

7,744subscribers

+493 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020650450
TypeChannel
Username@probelphilosophy
DescriptionВ основном про философию, но иногда еще что-то. Дополнительный контент и поддержка: https://t.me/tribute/app?startapp=ec8 Для связи пишите на почту ([email protected]) или в директ канала.
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/probelphilosophy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,2507,7447,4976 August 2026 — 7,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,323 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,337 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,348 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,384 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,386 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,378 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,388 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,380 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,403 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,463 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,537 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,592 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,594 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,605 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,615 subscribers25 October 2026 — 7,634 subscribers28 October 2026 — 7,716 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,741 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,744 subscribers6 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 90 days, net +493. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,176–7,818 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 17:067,744+3
31 Oct 2026, 10:057,741+25
28 Oct 2026, 09:467,716+82
25 Oct 2026, 01:387,634+19
21 Oct 2026, 15:007,615+10
18 Oct 2026, 04:507,605+11
15 Oct 2026, 15:077,594+2
12 Oct 2026, 13:177,592+55
5 Oct 2026, 12:377,537+74
27 Sept 2026, 17:587,463+60
18 Sept 2026, 15:597,403+23
14 Sept 2026, 09:217,380-8
10 Sept 2026, 15:157,388+10
5 Sept 2026, 20:397,378-8
1 Sept 2026, 17:577,386+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:057,384+36
26 Aug 2026, 18:247,348+11
23 Aug 2026, 16:037,337+14
19 Aug 2026, 20:567,323+11
16 Aug 2026, 18:237,312first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 22 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
73.9%
avg views ÷ 7,744 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,720
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held41 (22 June 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total108,700
Reactions total2,426
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 00:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
214
Videos
5
Links
268

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5,069 reactions across 32 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,80535.6%
😁1,10721.8%
🔥4879.61%
👍3887.65%
💅3787.46%
💯1392.74%
😭1082.13%
✍991.95%
🤔931.83%
🤡731.44%
🙏691.36%
🫡470.927%
🕊410.809%
🥰380.75%
🤓300.592%
💩280.552%
😎260.513%
😐230.454%
👏130.256%
👎120.237%
13 further kinds651.28%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 41 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,955 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
19
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 41 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @probelphilosophy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 41 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 19 posts held from the last 30 days (26.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,600 views64 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

😁48🤡10👎3💯3

3 Nov 2026, 10:06 UTC≈2,750 views62 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Психотерапия сегодня Последние годы психотерапия всё чаще становится мишенью для разносторонней критики: с левых позиций — за «деполитизацию» и «индивидуализацию» субъекта, с философских — за навязывание человеку особого языка самоописания, в популярной культуре — за распространение карикатурной «проработанности» и «осознанности». Так, получив широкое распространение, психотерапия столкнулась с кризисом. И хотя реше…

❤26🤔12👍9💩6💊5👀2⚡1😁1

31 Oct 2026, 10:56 UTC≈4,620 views97 reactions1 Starread 6 November 2026
Photo

В Твиттере все проходят этот тест на философские взгляды и совместимость с философами. Я как все

🤔55❤32😁7👍1🤡1😢1

29 Oct 2026, 15:57 UTC≈4,260 views66 reactionsread 6 November 2026

О Марксе Делюсь небольшим списком литературы (и не только), которая, как мне кажется, доступно и качественно рассказывает о Карле Марксе и его философии и которую я как-то использовал в своем ролике. Тексты • A very short introduction to Marx — Peter Singer На мой взгляд, самое доступное и качественное (с философской точки зрения) введение в Маркса. В книге Сингер понятно рассказывает о всех ключевых сюжетах марк…

👍49🔥9❤6✍2

28 Oct 2026, 15:12 UTC≈4,030 views149 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

В трактате «Исследование о человеческом познании» Дэвид Юм писал: Убеждение в человеческой слепоте и слабости является результатом всей философии; этот результат на каждом шагу вновь встречается нам вопреки всем нашим усилиям уклониться от него или его избежать. На мой взгляд, это сильно противоречит другому утверждению из этой работы: Никакие предметы не обладают бо́льшим сходством, чем яйца [...] Все-таки не та…

😁131🌚7❤6🤔3🔥2

25 Oct 2026, 11:42 UTC≈5,170 views266 reactions2 Starsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Вчера вышел мой ролик про философию Маркса. Потратил очень много сил на него, но при этом далеко не все получилось, из того, что планировал изначально и не всем остался доволен. Тем не менее, благодарен всем за поддержку, положительную реакцию и обсуждение по содержанию! Уже работаю над двумя новыми видео, которые выйдут в ноябре (может, даже три), а список литературы к ролику появится здесь на днях.

❤210🔥38👍18

24 Oct 2026, 13:25 UTC≈9,860 views202 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Карл Маркс как философ: исторический материализм, идеология и союз философии с пролетариатом Маркс, безусловно, является одним из самых известных и влиятельных философов в истории. При этом реконструкция его взглядов сопряжена со множеством трудностей: от того, что многие его тексты либо очень короткие, либо остались незавершенными и сохранились лишь в виде черновиков, до огромного количества противоречивых интерпре…

🔥124❤46🤓17👍9🍌3🤡2💩1

23 Oct 2026, 12:18 UTC≈5,750 views50 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Все, что нужно знать о Боге Философы Андрей Леман и Александра Ильина запустили курс «Выражая невыразимое: от истоков теизма до „смерти Бога“». На курсе вы узнаете, что философия может сказать о Боге, как мыслители разных эпох осмысляли это понятие и какие вопросы ставили в связи с ним — от проблемы зла и человеческой свободы до попыток доказать существование Бога. Я пригласил Андрея и Александру прочитать онлайн-…

❤26🔥10😁6👍2🕊2🙏2🎉1👎1

19 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈6,490 views94 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Poll

Кто вы?

  1. Православный9%
  2. Патриот4%
  3. Просто человек18%
  4. Либерал12%
  5. Западник5%
  6. Идиот27%
  7. Елицинцентр13%
  8. Я не из России13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

😁79❤15

19 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTC≈5,300 views113 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @Agdchan

В России есть: Хорошие люди (православные, патриоты, просто люди) И плохие (либералы, западники, идиоты, Ельцинцентр). Ну вот и всё.

😁95💅10🤡4🥰4

18 Oct 2026, 09:00 UTC≈5,940 views124 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Друзья, пока мое видео о том, почему Карл Маркс, несмотря на все проблемы, является важным и интересным философом, все еще в процессе приготовления, предлагаю заранее для соблюдения баланса во вселенной окунуться в свежие рассуждения о политике с противоположного фланга. Посмотрите видео Рождение демократии из духа войны, если вы достаточно неуравновешенный человек, чтобы воспринимать визуальный ряд похожий на то, ч…

❤76😁31👍10💩2🤔2🤡2👎1

15 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈6,120 views123 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Forwarded from @legaldramaPhoto

🤩Мишелю Фуко 100🤩 будучи философом при юристах, невозможно было не встроить Фуко в собственный syllabus. для теоретика права он удивительный феномен: так много работать с юридической материей и не написать, по формальным признакам, ни одной философско-правовой работы. самого Фуко чаще всего вписывают в традицию постмодерного права или не-классической юриспруденции, а также традиции law&society. мне эти ярлыки не осо…

💯80❤23✍7🥰5👍3💩2🤡2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @probelphilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Oct 2026, 10:00 UTCAnonymous Poll2,040 voters approx.

Кто вы?

  1. Православный9%
  2. Патриот4%
  3. Просто человек18%
  4. Либерал12%
  5. Западник5%
  6. Идиот27%
  7. Елицинцентр13%
  8. Я не из России13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 4 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пробел” (@probelphilosophy), 7,744 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probelphilosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.