Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Пробел

Channel

Пробел

@probelphilosophy

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

7,403subscribers

+152 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002020650450
TypeChannel
Username@probelphilosophy
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/probelphilosophy

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7,2507,4037,326.56 August 2026 — 7,251 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,250 subscribers9 August 2026 — 7,253 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,286 subscribers16 August 2026 — 7,312 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,323 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,337 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,348 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,384 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,386 subscribers5 September 2026 — 7,378 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,388 subscribers14 September 2026 — 7,380 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,403 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 43 days, net +152. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,227–7,426 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:597,403+23
14 Sept 2026, 09:217,380-8
10 Sept 2026, 15:157,388+10
5 Sept 2026, 20:397,378-8
1 Sept 2026, 17:577,386+2
30 Aug 2026, 03:057,384+36
26 Aug 2026, 18:247,348+11
23 Aug 2026, 16:037,337+14
19 Aug 2026, 20:567,323+11
16 Aug 2026, 18:237,312+26
12 Aug 2026, 22:587,286+33
9 Aug 2026, 21:527,253+3
7 Aug 2026, 04:067,250-1
6 Aug 2026, 04:347,251first reading

Engagement

22 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 13 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 22 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

2,643 reactions across 13 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
97737.0%
😁48418.3%
💅36313.7%
👍2378.97%
🔥1465.52%
903.41%
😭843.18%
🫡411.55%
💯351.32%
🥰291.10%
😎260.984%
😐230.87%
🤡220.832%
🤔190.719%
🤓130.492%
😱90.341%
👎70.265%
👏70.265%
💩70.265%
🤯70.265%
7 further kinds170.643%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 22 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @probelphilosophy. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 22 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 June 2026 to 20 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

20 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC814 views40 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Возможно ли написать лучшую книгу? Философ Джордж Эдвард Мур в предисловии к своей книги Principia Ethica (один из самых влиятельных трудов в области моральной философии ХХ века) пишет следующее: Если бы я мог переписать мою работу теперь, я написал бы совсем другую и, как я полагаю, гораздо лучшую книгу. Но можно сомневаться, смог ли бы я, стараясь удовлетворить самого себя, не только более глубоко изложить идеи,

27👏4🤔4👍3👎1💊1

6 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC≈2,560 views37 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @shkola_angliyskogoPhoto

помните — уже была «высшая школа английского»? и в этом году тоже будет, только теперь совсем другая! в преподавании есть такая забавная штука — сколько не делай программ, все равно в следующий раз хочется сделать лучше. и в этот раз в очередной раз получилось! курс состоит из девяти взаимосвязанных модулей. мы будем говорить о памяти, языке, красоте, будущем, поп-культуре, визуальности и других вещах, к которым сн

23🤔10🤯4

4 Aug 2026, 12:27 UTC≈3,860 views128 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Как я веду конспекты чтения (да, это Claude + Obsidian) Много лет для меня вопрос конспектирования стоял очень остро, так как, с одной стороны, память часто подводит, а с другой — придумать, как создавать удобные заметки, к которым хочется возвращаться, никак не получалось. Оказалось, те самые Claude с Obsidian помогают решить и этот вопрос. В новом ролике для Двойного пробела рассказываю сначала о своих неудачных

78😐21👍14🤡5😁4🤔2🤯2🥰2

30 Jul 2026, 08:20 UTC≈5,410 views151 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Но опыт более чем достаточно показывает, что люди ни над чем не имеют так мало власти, как над языком, и так же мало могут сдержать его, как свои позывы. Бенедикт Спиноза, «Этика», часть III, схолия ко 2-му положению.

87💯30🥰1310😁5😭4👍1🕊1

29 Jul 2026, 09:42 UTC≈5,610 views423 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо за поддержку и фидбэк (в том числе критический) по последнему ролику! Я НЕ читаю книжки и НЕ слушаю лекции, поэтому у меня есть время на все ваши комментарии (иначе зачем все это). Не забывайте только ставить лайк, если вам понравилось видео — это, правда, важно. Обнял.

288😁113🤡10🥰8🔥2💩1🤷1

27 Jul 2026, 12:52 UTC≈6,150 views32 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Лекции и ридинги на Двойном пробеле Привет, вы читаете нерегуляный пост с анонсами того, что будет в ближайшее время в моем канале с дополнительным контентом Двойной пробел. Лекции: Прощай человек. Современность как философская проблема • Философ и религиовед Семен Ларин расскажет об отношении Мераба Мамардашвили и Мишеля Фуко к самой современности. В 60-е и 70-е года они независимо друг от друга, но схожим обра

19👍8😱4👎1

27 Jul 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,830 views115 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @here_was_dragons

Кому придёт в голову беспокоиться об истинности сказанного, если с куда большей надёжностью собственными словами можно зарабатывать социальный капитал? Раз так, то вот небольшой урок о том, как из разумных высказываний делать идеологические мантры. Для начала взглянем на три тезиса, которые заведомо не являются бредовыми и даже могут быть обоснованы: (1) Женщины в среднем лучше, чем мужчины, понимают, какие станда

63👍23🤓13🔥83🤷3👀1🆒1

26 Jul 2026, 13:52 UTC≈4,340 views293 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😁19356😎26🔥6💯4😭4👍3👀1

26 Jul 2026, 07:53 UTC≈5,830 views188 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026

Что не так с нишей интеллектуального контента? Мы живем в эпоху повседневного кризиса (crisis ordinariness), когда именно отчуждение труда делает нас тревожными, а голливудские трендсеттеры из ненависти к женщинам навязывают им культ смерти. Узнали? Я не особо, но креаторы из Инстаграма постараются показать вам, что все именно так. В новом видео рассуждаю о нише интеллектуального контента в интернете и пытаюсь поня

121👍34🔥15🤡7💩6👎3💯1🤯1

25 Jul 2026, 09:55 UTC≈5,070 views168 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Не успели доделать — выйдет завтра утром! Приготовьте, пожалуйста, классы! И раз так вышло, поделюсь, что, на самом деле, никого сильно критиковать не буду, а попробую только обсудить с вами активно формирующуюся нишу интеллектуального контента в интернете (то есть и себя самого).

🔥105😭3617👍10

22 Jul 2026, 15:41 UTC≈7,210 views579 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Бимбо-стоицизм, его друзья и всякая разная пикми-философия из рилсов и ютуба, у меня для вас плохие новости: в эту субботу новое видео. Церемониться не буду.

💅363125😁58😭15🔥8🙏5🤔3👎2

21 Jul 2026, 10:24 UTC≈7,250 views281 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

Посмотрите на Ютубе канал Пробел

👍131😁104😭2513😱5🤩2🕊1

Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @probelphilosophy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 15 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Пробел” (@probelphilosophy), 7,403 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probelphilosophy.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.