Channel
@fromm_tg
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
8,392subscribers
-113 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001567313074 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @fromm_tg |
| Created | 30 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 24 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 19 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 24 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/fromm_tg |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @fromm_tg/5009 · this entry6 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC | @Personstg/70346 Jul 2026, 11:21 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Personstg/70367 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC | @fromm_tg/5011 · this entry7 Jul 2026, 10:47 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Personstg/704121 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC | @fromm_tg/5018 · this entry21 Jul 2026, 11:39 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @Personstg/704322 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC | @fromm_tg/5020 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 06:31 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @fromm_tg/5024 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC | @Personstg/70477 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @Personstg | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (5–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 26 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @fromm_tg — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 8,392 | -14 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 15:27 | 8,406 | -4 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 16:09 | 8,410 | -10 |
| 11 Oct 2026, 14:59 | 8,420 | -14 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 04:57 | 8,434 | -15 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 8,449 | -18 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:37 | 8,467 | -5 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:38 | 8,472 | -8 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:17 | 8,480 | -18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 16:15 | 8,498 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 8,495 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 8,491 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 20:57 | 8,495 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 8,497 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 03:22 | 8,502 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:23 | 8,507 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 8,506 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 8,505 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 8,505 | first reading |
26 posts held, back to 26 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 25 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
656 reactions across 22 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 78.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 516 | 78.7% | |
| 💯 | 68 | 10.4% | |
| 👍 | 20 | 3.05% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 1.68% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 1.52% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 1.37% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 1.22% | |
| 💘 | 7 | 1.07% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.457% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 0.305% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.152% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 0.152% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 656 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 26 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Давание – это высшее проявление силы. В каждом акте давания я осуществляю свою силу, своё богатство, свою власть. Такое переживание высокой жизнеспособности и силы наполняет меня радостью. Я чувствую себя уверенным, способным на большие затраты сил, полным жизни и потому радостным. Давать – более радостно, чем брать не потому, что это лишение, а потому, что в этом акте давания проявляется выражение моей жизнеспособно…
❤11❤🔥1🔥1
Любовь – это не обязательно отношение к определенному человеку; это установка, ориентация характера, которая задает отношение человека к миру вообще, а не только к одному «объекту» любви. Если человек любит только кого-то одного и безразличен к остальным ближним, его любовь – это не любовь, а симбиотический союз. Большинство людей уверены, что любовь зависит от объекта, а не от собственной способности любить. Они даж…
❤37🔥8👍7
У человека есть лишь одно решение проблемы: посмотреть в лицо истине, признать своё полное одиночество и изолированность во вселенной , равнодушной к его судьбе, осознать, что нет превосходящей его силы, которая разрешила бы проблему за него. Человек должен взять на себя ответственность за себя и принять тот факт, что придать смысл своей жизни он может только собственными силами
❤26🙏9💯8👍5
Может показаться, что у современного человека нет недостатка в желаниях, что он знает, чего хочет, и единственная его проблема — невозможность все свои желания выполнить. Вся наша энергия уходит на достижение того, чего мы хотим, и большинство людей никогда не задумывается о первопричине этой деятельности: знают ли они, чего на самом деле хотят, сами ли они хотят достичь тех целей, к которым стремятся.
❤22💯7
Эгоизм, себялюбие и жадность – это свойства, которые необходимы самой системе для ее существования, они ведут общество к миру и гармонии.
❤14🤔7👎1
Ты вроде владелец бизнеса, а по факту кто? 😱 Самый тревожный сотрудник в своей же компании. Проверить, напомнить, вмешаться, разрулить, успокоить клиента. Я делал так же. Пока однажды всё не начало разваливаться 💔 В канале Метод Князева есть разборы, после которых многим предпринимателям становится неуютно. Про тревогу, гиперконтроль, усталость и резкие решения Читайте в канале: 🔗 https://t.me/+Mg1uaoUgvUxkODE
Ничто не объединяет людей сильнее, чем общие чувства: восхищение одним и тем же, общность мыслей, культурных символов и ритуалов и даже общее горе.
❤34💯16
Трагедия человека отчасти заключается в том, что его развитие никогда не завершается; даже при наиболее благоприятных условиях человек реализует лишь часть своих возможностей.
❤22💯18
Головой вы всё понимаете. Но чувство всё равно не отпускает? Вы знаете, что опасности уже нет, отношения закончились, а обиду пора оставить в прошлом. Но тревога, страх, боль или тяжёлые мысли продолжают возвращаться. Так бывает, когда переживание словно «застряло» и одних разговоров с собой уже недостаточно. ДПДГ - современный метод психотерапии: десенсибилизация и переработка с помощью движений глаз, рекомендов…
❤3
Одержимость только лишь работой так же точно может свести с ума, как и полное безделье. Только сочетание труда с радостным отдыхом позволяет выживать.
❤43💘7👍1
Бюджетные рецепты на любой вкус 🥪 Горячее 🥘 Салаты 🥗 Супы 🍜 Все блюда из простых ингредиентов которые есть в каждом доме 👌 Обязательно загляните 👇 Будем готовить вместе 👇 https://t.me/+66hMajFiFnE4MGRi
Любовь возможна лишь в том случае, когда двое общаются друг с другом на самом глубоком уровне существования, и поэтому каждый из них переживает себя на этом уровне. Только здесь, в этом «глубинном» переживании, заложена человеческая действительность, жизненность, заложена основа любви. Любовь, переживаемая таким образом, – это постоянный вызов; это не место отдыха, а движение, развитие, совместная работа; и даже то, …
❤43🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @fromm_tg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Эрих Фромм” (@fromm_tg), 8,392 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fromm_tg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.