Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Фёдор Достоевский. Лайфстайл

Channel

Фёдор Достоевский. Лайфстайл

@dostoevskiy_life

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

38,088subscribers

+114 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001604261324
TypeChannel
Username@dostoevskiy_life
DescriptionМеланхолия, рефлексия и язвительные замечания из дневников и писем Ф.М. Достоевского Еще лайф-каналы @channel_lifestyle Стикеры https://t.me/addstickers/dostoevskiy_life Админ @alexes_life https://goo.su/68uQbgo
Created5 May 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/dostoevskiy_life

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

37,92338,10438,013.56 August 2026 — 37,974 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,974 subscribers6 August 2026 — 37,960 subscribers7 August 2026 — 37,943 subscribers8 August 2026 — 37,936 subscribers9 August 2026 — 37,937 subscribers10 August 2026 — 37,923 subscribers11 August 2026 — 37,931 subscribers12 August 2026 — 37,943 subscribers13 August 2026 — 37,960 subscribers15 August 2026 — 37,972 subscribers16 August 2026 — 38,008 subscribers17 August 2026 — 38,023 subscribers18 August 2026 — 38,050 subscribers19 August 2026 — 38,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 38,029 subscribers21 August 2026 — 38,037 subscribers23 August 2026 — 38,052 subscribers24 August 2026 — 38,058 subscribers25 August 2026 — 38,075 subscribers27 August 2026 — 38,043 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,034 subscribers28 August 2026 — 38,032 subscribers30 August 2026 — 38,023 subscribers31 August 2026 — 38,017 subscribers1 September 2026 — 38,019 subscribers2 September 2026 — 38,025 subscribers3 September 2026 — 38,027 subscribers5 September 2026 — 38,065 subscribers8 September 2026 — 38,104 subscribers11 September 2026 — 38,092 subscribers13 September 2026 — 38,102 subscribers14 September 2026 — 38,097 subscribers16 September 2026 — 38,095 subscribers18 September 2026 — 38,088 subscribers38,0886 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,896–38,131 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 15:4038,088-7
16 Sept 2026, 07:2038,095-2
14 Sept 2026, 15:3938,097-5
13 Sept 2026, 02:1538,102+10
11 Sept 2026, 03:5938,092-12
8 Sept 2026, 04:1838,104+39
5 Sept 2026, 03:5738,065+38
3 Sept 2026, 09:1538,027+2
2 Sept 2026, 03:2438,025+6
1 Sept 2026, 00:5738,019+2
31 Aug 2026, 02:2438,017-6
30 Aug 2026, 00:0938,023-9
28 Aug 2026, 22:2538,032-2
28 Aug 2026, 01:2338,034-9
27 Aug 2026, 00:1338,043-32
25 Aug 2026, 22:2838,075+17
24 Aug 2026, 22:0938,058+6
23 Aug 2026, 11:2638,052+15
21 Aug 2026, 20:3938,037+8
20 Aug 2026, 16:1538,029first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 88 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.8%
avg views ÷ 38,088 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,670
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.12%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 September 2026
Posts held73 (17 July 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Views total277,450
Reactions total5,875
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Sept 2026, 00:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
34
Videos
1
Links
86

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
17s
Average length
17s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

14,663 reactions across 72 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤6,48844.2%
❤‍🔥1,51610.3%
💯1,3419.15%
💔1,2758.70%
😁9706.62%
😢9256.31%
custom 52085651354503452888285.65%
🔥7194.90%
👏6014.10%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 73 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,884 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 24 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
24
across the posts below
Posts paid on
19
of 73 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @dostoevskiy_life. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 73 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 July 2026 to 24 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

24 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈2,170 views158 reactions1 Starread 25 September 2026

Подъем женщины у нас не подвержен никакому сомнению. Мужчины и были шатки, теперь же пуще развратились стяжанием, цинизмом. Жаль, что женщина слаба, устает, не выносит разочарования. Записная тетрадь (1876–1877)

❤81💔41❤‍🔥27😁5💯4

24 Sept 2026, 11:17 UTC≈2,660 views22 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Video

«тьма — это не отсутствие света, это то, что свет не способен понять, когда он всматривается в бездну. то, что кажется нам человеческим лицом, на самом деле лишь хрупкая маска, скрывающая автономные потоки чистого ужаса, которые используют наше сознание как питательный субстрат». ник лэнд добро пожаловать в коллонну, последний театр, последних времён 😏 КОЛЛОННА это вирус он взламывает интерфейсы восприятия через к…

❤11😁5😢5🔥1

23 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈13,000 views163 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Об России же самые образованные европейские государства со страстью распространяют теперь совершенные нелепости. В Европе и прежде нас мало знали, даже до того, что всегда надо было удивляться, что столь просвещенные народы так мало интересуются изучить тот народ, который они же так ненавидят и которого постоянно боятся. Эта скудость европейских о нас познаний и даже некоторая невозможность Европы понять нас во многи…

❤100🔥29❤‍🔥17😁12😢5

22 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈4,250 views172 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Не цвести цветам после осени. 1859 год, 22 сентября 37 лет

💔114❤38❤‍🔥18🔥2

21 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈5,580 views288 reactionsread 25 September 2026

В нашей странной России можно делать все что угодно. Бесы

❤‍🔥149💯65💔34😁24❤16

20 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈5,500 views184 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Газеты полны описаниями, как народ выбирает своих выборных, – в присутствии «начальства», непременного члена какого-нибудь, и что из этого происходит. 1881 год 59 лет

❤108😁51🔥12👏9💔4

19 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈5,580 views148 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Кто же может остановить законную волю человека. 1844 год, 19 сентября 22 года

❤107👏24❤‍🔥15🔥2

18 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈6,220 views195 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Во всю жизнь мою ни разу не продавал сочинений, не брав вперед деньги. Я литератор-пролетарий, и если кто захочет моей работы, то должен меня вперед обеспечить. Порядок этот я сам проклинаю. Но так завелось и, кажется, никогда не выведется. 1863 год, 18 сентября 41 год

❤112😁42👏28😢10🔥3

17 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈6,570 views166 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Теперь почти у всех, конечно, один только вопрос: что именно сейчас же, теперь же может случиться? Тут уж не до отдаленного будущего, не до окончательного устройства; текущие события дошли до высшей точки своего напряжения. 1873 год, 17 сентября 51 год

❤81💯46💔27❤‍🔥8😢4

16 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈6,470 views114 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Климат в Женеве для меня скверный. В Германии припадки были очень редкие, а в Женеве не опомнюсь, чуть не каждую неделю. Всё это горы и беспрерывные перемены в атмосфере. Надобно выехать. 1867 год, 16 сентября 45 лет

❤71💔24😁12❤‍🔥5🔥2

15 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈6,720 views202 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Умные старички наши всё еще до сих пор уверены, что они-то и есть самые новые и молодые люди и что говорят самые новые слова! 1877 год, сентябрь 55 лет

❤98😁70🔥19❤‍🔥12💔3

14 Sept 2026, 14:17 UTC≈6,880 views137 reactionsread 25 September 2026

Я весь как будто под воздушным насосом, из которого воздух вытягивают. Всё из меня ушло в голову, а из головы в мысль, всё, решительно всё, и несмотря на то эта работа с каждым днем увеличивается. 1849 год, 14 сентября 27 лет

❤‍🔥86❤36💯13🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @dostoevskiy_life. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

russiansinlondon
@russiansinlnd · 21,207
4 posts
𝑀𝑦 𝑙𝑖𝑡𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝐸𝑚𝑝𝑖𝑟𝑒 🪶 | Литература
@FandomRuslita · 44
2 posts
Вячеслав Лещев. Картины с казачьим характером.
@cossack_art · 2,167
2 posts
Июньский вечер
@junevening · 1
2 posts
Макс атакует!
@shevchenkomax_1 · 117,139
2 posts
перто 2026
@BETMEHTCMOCKBA · 27
1 post
Неправильный книжный блог
@BookGeek · 245
1 post
Евангелие от Айдара
@aidar_bandeapart · 27
1 post
Anabel.Bronshtein
@anabelbronshtein · 12
1 post
Apelsinovyj
@apelsinovyj_splesh · 56
1 post
Синяя Z Борода
@beard_tim · 111,521
1 post
Искусство жить| познание и осознание
@dushetvorets · 59
1 post
ELLIE MEER
@esblogg · 96
1 post
Галина Терещенко
@galina_tereshchenko · 260
1 post
матный гном
@karochepacani · 112
1 post
хаваарт
@khavashkaart · 1,071
1 post
Касым был косым
@kos_kasym · 168
1 post
Камина
@leo_kamina · 137
1 post
let it be.
@letinbee · 168
1 post
проекты ОРОО "Наша Земля", NZ56.ru, Юрий Кожемякин
@nashazemlya56 · 9
1 post
Трезвые (кринжовые, христианские) мемы с Антоном
@pizzhennye_memy · 17
1 post
Психопушка
@psychopushka · 544
1 post
Публициста LIVE
@publizista · 45
1 post
Русскiй композиторъ
@ruscomp · 114
1 post
russiansinbarcelona
@russiansinbcn · 3
1 post
Салатницы
@salatnyci · 10,562
1 post
Союзъ Русскихъ Женщинъ
@soyuz_russkih_zhenshin · 1,620
1 post
Трагедия каждого дня
@tragedyofeveryday · 532
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

Антон Чехов. Лайфстайл
@chekhov_life · 74,380
#1
Лев Толстой. Лайфстайл
@tolstoy_life · 59,873
#2
Иван Тургенев. Лайфстайл
@turgenev_life · 9,428
#3
Александр Пушкин. Лайфстайл
@pushkins_life · 26,107
#4
Михаил Булгаков. Лайфстайл
@bulgakov_life · 20,089
#5
Николай Гоголь. Лайфстайл
@gogol_life · 12,582
#6
Александр Блок. Лайфстайл
@blok_life · 6,864
#7
Карл Юнг. Лайфстайл
@Jung_life · 9,465
#8
Зигмунд Фрейд. Лайфстайл
@freudlife · 9,565
#9
Жизнь в дневниках
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 165,339
#10
Фридрих Ницше
@Nietzsche_tsitaty_filosofia · 17,760
#11
Читал, но забыл | Литература
@literary_tg · 18,893
#12
Кафка на завтрак
@kafkanazavtrak · 7,127
#13
Дневник Булгакова
@bulgakov_tg · 7,619
#14
THE ARK
@ark_gallery · 4,617
#15
Медуза — LIVE
@meduzalive · 1,121,201
#16
ЭТО ЗНАК
@etoznakmag · 636,947
#17
Артемий Лебедев
@temalebedev · 968,245
#18
Эрих Мария Ремарк
@remark_tsitaty_aforizmy · 20,949
#19
reading is sexy
@reading_sexy · 33,596
#20
Pupok
@pupopipizheka · 1,434
#21
Дневник Ахматовой
@diaryofakhmatova · 6,815
#22
dmitrii belikov page
@dimavsedelapage · 7,092
#23
Дневник Лермонтова
@diaryoflermontov · 5,166
#24
Дневник Цветаевой
@diaryoftsvetaeva · 6,514
#25
Кафка вещает
@kafkafranzzz · 5,295
#26
Классики. Лайфстайл
@klassiki_life · 10,881
#27
Гусь Василий под тополем
@gus_vasili · 38,045
#28
Париж не стоит мессы
@deadpoetscom · 19,360
#29
Пездуза
@pezduzalive · 372,470
#30
Старая Москва
@old_Moscow · 134,273
#31
razionalnaya
@razionalnaya · 4,998
#32
далекое близкое
@dalblizka · 3,275
#33
Фаина Раневская
@Ranevskaya_tsitaty_teatr · 30,607
#34
russian nostalghia
@russian_nostalghia · 10,740
#35
Бунин
@Dark_Avenues · 3,718
#36
🕯️Dostoevsky’s private place🎻
@lyblyfyedy · 537
#37
Дневник Гоголя
@diaryofgogol · 3,864
#38
Дневник Андреева
@dnevnikandreeva · 2,165
#39
Эрих Фромм
@fromm_tg · 8,467
#40
Neural Machine
@neuralmachine · 48,710
#41
Взрывы домов. Минута в минуту
@minutavminutu · 166,652
#42
Марина Цветаева. О личном
@cvetaevalife · 2,541
#43
Теперь живите с этим
@viveconesto · 54,033
#44
Карл Густав Юнг
@Jung_tsitaty_psyhoIogia · 63,822
#45
Дневник Гумилева
@gumilev_dnevnik · 2,816
#46
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,693
#47
Осторожно, новости
@ostorozhno_novosti · 1,620,141
#48
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,158,879
#49
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,535,150
#50
диалектический отказ
@istominakarina · 157,537
#51
Я не понимаю это смешно или уже нет!!
@sashaonline · 86,526
#52
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,518
#53
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,013
#54
Андрей Тарковский
@Tarkovsky_tsitaty_kino · 14,040
#55
Жизнь насекомых
@insect_life · 192,024
#56
Дудь
@yurydud · 862,341
#57
Сергей Минаев
@minaevlife · 318,729
#58
Лука Ебков
@luka_ebkov · 431,305
#59
Golden Chihuahua
@goldchihuahua · 91,409
#60
не тереби дао
@dukaliti · 122,992
#61
Стрелец-Молодец
@strelets_molodec · 355,464
#62
russiansinlondon
@russiansinlnd · 21,207
#63
КАШИН
@kashinguru · 75,441
#64
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,786
#65
📖 Новые главы BSD
@bsdnewchapters · 17,311
#66
историк-алкоголик
@istrkalkglk · 122,253
#67
Кинопоиск | Фильмы и сериалы
@kinopoisk · 806,604
#68
ÖMANKÖ
@omanko · 113,987
#69
SVTV NEWS — Либертарианское СМИ
@svtvnews · 113,037
#70
Отдел по Делам Одарённых || ПЕРЕВОД ГЛАВ БСД
@chelkadostatrans · 70,472
#71
Дмитрий Медведев
@medvedev_telegram · 1,700,869
#72
СОБЧАК
@ksbchk · 372,627
#73
СЛАВА КПСС \ АНТИХАЙП
@antihype_kpss · 173,967
#74
Библия
@rus_bible · 15,999
#75
"Maddyson" развлекательный телеграм канал!
@maddysontg · 204,019
#76
Arzamas
@ArzamasLive · 59,379
#77
Екатерина Шульман
@eschulmann · 303,468
#78
all the cool stuff
@thecoolstuffonly · 1,616
#79

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 31 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Лев Толстой. Лайфстайл
@tolstoy_life · 59,873
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Антон Чехов. Лайфстайл
@chekhov_life · 74,380
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026
Александр Пушкин. Лайфстайл
@pushkins_life · 26,107
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Жизнь в дневниках
@tsitaty_dnevniki_stikhi · 165,339
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 12 August 2026
Фаина Раневская
@Ranevskaya_tsitaty_teatr · 30,607
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
Евгений Жаринов - Лекции и анонсы
@Evgeny_Zharinov · 29,682
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 8 September 2026
Открытые письма | Литература
@open_letters · 41,123
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Фёдор Достоевский. Лайфстайл” (@dostoevskiy_life), 38,088 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dostoevskiy_life.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.