Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Салатницы

Channel

Салатницы

@salatnyci

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

10,562subscribers

+79 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001571836020
TypeChannel
Username@salatnyci
Created27 October 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/salatnyci

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

10,48310,56810,525.57 August 2026 — 10,483 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,483 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,489 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,496 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,498 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,506 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,512 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,509 subscribers15 August 2026 — 10,523 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,527 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,531 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,534 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,520 subscribers21 August 2026 — 10,533 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,548 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,546 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,547 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,548 subscribers28 August 2026 — 10,543 subscribers29 August 2026 — 10,562 subscribers30 August 2026 — 10,559 subscribers31 August 2026 — 10,562 subscribers1 September 2026 — 10,560 subscribers2 September 2026 — 10,557 subscribers3 September 2026 — 10,559 subscribers5 September 2026 — 10,560 subscribers11 September 2026 — 10,568 subscribers13 September 2026 — 10,565 subscribers15 September 2026 — 10,561 subscribers17 September 2026 — 10,556 subscribers19 September 2026 — 10,562 subscribers10,5627 August 202619 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 43 days, net +79. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,470–10,581 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 12:5910,562+6
17 Sept 2026, 00:5910,556-5
15 Sept 2026, 03:2210,561-4
13 Sept 2026, 11:3810,565-3
11 Sept 2026, 15:4010,568+8
5 Sept 2026, 15:1610,560+1
3 Sept 2026, 15:1410,559+2
2 Sept 2026, 06:5310,557-3
1 Sept 2026, 07:0410,560-2
31 Aug 2026, 08:5310,562+3
30 Aug 2026, 11:4410,559-3
29 Aug 2026, 08:5510,562+19
28 Aug 2026, 09:4210,543-5
27 Aug 2026, 11:3410,548+1
26 Aug 2026, 14:5310,547+1
25 Aug 2026, 12:3310,546-2
22 Aug 2026, 20:2910,548+15
21 Aug 2026, 12:0610,533+13
20 Aug 2026, 14:0610,520-14
19 Aug 2026, 12:1610,534first reading

Engagement

286 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.05%
avg views ÷ 10,562 subscribers
Avg views / post
956
64 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.58%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
64
of 286 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 62 of 64 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held286 (6 August 202629 August 2026)
Views total61,185
Reactions total2,791
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken29 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 34m
Average length
1m 34s

Measured directly from 137 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,364 reactions across 282 posts, in 65 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2,00615.0%
2,00415.0%
😁2,00015.0%
❤‍🔥9176.86%
🤣9126.82%
🎉8486.35%
🥴6304.71%
custom 52358065668206197555063.79%
👍4073.05%
🤡3262.44%
👀3102.32%
🥰3082.30%
💯2942.20%
custom 54631053500455529951961.47%
🍾1681.26%
🤯1461.09%
😨1300.973%
💔1190.89%
😍910.681%
🥱890.666%
45 further kinds9577.16%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 283 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,364 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
10
of 286 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @salatnyci. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 286 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 29 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC151 views6 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Катя Лель в #запрещенка.

😁41🥴1

Signed Alisa

29 Aug 2026, 12:28 UTC641 views30 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Сашка учит нас как пшикаться парфюмом, чтобы уж наверняка

🤣24🔥4👀2

Signed Екатерина

29 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC≈1,000 views101 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Forwarded from @darkvoicemagPhoto

Ирину Мягкову возмутили постоянные бестактные вопросы о том, когда у нее появятся дети. Создательница шоу «Женский стендап» попросила людей перестать задавать такие вопросы знакомым и незнакомым людям. «Вы никогда не знаете, что стоит за молчанием человека. Возможно, женщина не хочет детей. Возможно, хочет, но пока не готова. Возможно, она проходит через лечение, потерю, сложный период в отношениях или другие обстоя

💯94👏7

Signed Aleksandra

29 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈1,100 views86 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Идут ли женщинам мужские костюмы Майкл Б. Джордан и Зендея🔥 Зе ❤️ Майкл 🥰

70🥰10💯5🔥1

Signed Aleksandra

29 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC≈1,110 views53 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Бэкхемы в отпуске

39🔥7👍5🥱2

Signed Екатерина

29 Aug 2026, 09:43 UTC≈1,330 views40 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

#наши на творческом вечере Раймонда Паулса в рамках «Новой волны» в Казани: Валерий Леонтьев, Дима Билан, Филипп Киркоров, Алсу, Владимир Пресняков, Анжелика Варум, Сергей Челобанов, Ани Лорак, Лолита, Александр Ревва. Фото: Егор Алеев (ТАСС).

custom 546310535004555299531❤‍🔥42👍2🔥1

Signed Alisa

28 Aug 2026, 20:43 UTC794 views15 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Любовь Соколова в программе «Дело житейское». #ретро

121👏1🫡1

Signed Alisa

28 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC883 views72 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Наталье Гундаревой сегодня бы исполнилось 78 лет.

❤‍🔥40🕊179👏2custom 53123406807171182472🍾1💔1

Signed Alisa

28 Aug 2026, 20:13 UTC974 views8 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Мультфильм на ночь: «Подводные друзья». #мульт

😁61🎄1

Signed Alisa

28 Aug 2026, 19:47 UTC≈1,160 views58 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня день рождения у Владимира Ивашова и Юрия Беляева.

🔥40🎉9🏆62🍾1

Signed Alisa

28 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC≈1,540 views51 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Меган Маркл и принц Гарри потратили шестизначную сумму на перелет на частном самолете из Лос-Анджелеса в Бирмингем. 💰 Page Six может эксклюзивно сообщить, что пара арендовала частный самолет через Planet 9, на котором были две ванные комнаты, удобные места для 13 пассажиров, пять кроватей, рассчитанных на шесть человек, и место для хранения 12–15 средних чемоданов. ✈️

👀33🤡9🔥5😁31

Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @salatnyci. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@salatnyci edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бабка на лавке
@babkalavka · 68,784
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Путешествия 🌎 Красота мира ❤️
@travelslocation · 37,483
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 August 2026
Королевская семья 1royalnews / Royal News
@royalnews11 · 22,334
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 21 September 2026
ФСН 🐞 OFFICIAL️
@fsnonline · 39,545
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 August 2026
Из порося в карася
@imho_katerina · 42,353
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Салатницы” (@salatnyci), 10,562 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/salatnyci.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.