Travel — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. They sit inside a group of 377 channels that share the same post bodies with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 45 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Across the whole group of 377, the earliest publisher we hold is @mash. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Also posting the same content
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 376 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
326 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +263. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 79,633–79,982 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 23:36
79,942
+24
16 Sept 2026, 13:20
79,918
+36
14 Sept 2026, 20:58
79,882
+2
13 Sept 2026, 06:38
79,880
+20
11 Sept 2026, 09:39
79,860
-20
8 Sept 2026, 12:19
79,880
+2
5 Sept 2026, 06:57
79,878
+71
3 Sept 2026, 10:57
79,807
+115
2 Sept 2026, 02:47
79,692
-9
1 Sept 2026, 02:37
79,701
-5
31 Aug 2026, 02:55
79,706
+2
29 Aug 2026, 23:54
79,704
-8
28 Aug 2026, 21:02
79,712
+6
27 Aug 2026, 19:03
79,706
+20
26 Aug 2026, 18:28
79,686
+9
25 Aug 2026, 15:12
79,677
+4
24 Aug 2026, 16:14
79,673
-30
22 Aug 2026, 21:19
79,703
-1
21 Aug 2026, 12:27
79,704
-14
20 Aug 2026, 12:44
79,718
first reading
Engagement
1,007 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 97 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.33%
avg views ÷ 79,942 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,860
649 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.971%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
649
of 1,007 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 647 of 649 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held
1,007 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total
3,801,827
Reactions total
36,912
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
23 Sept 2026, 00:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈26,300
Videos
≈5,390
Links
≈35,800
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 47m
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 166 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
59,951 reactions across 988 posts, in 36 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
9,191
15.3%
❤
6,845
11.4%
👍
6,473
10.8%
😁
4,805
8.01%
😱
4,520
7.54%
🔥
3,890
6.49%
🤯
3,278
5.47%
🤬
2,708
4.52%
👀
2,235
3.73%
🙈
2,098
3.50%
😢
1,984
3.31%
🤨
1,489
2.48%
😡
1,434
2.39%
👏
1,230
2.05%
🙉
1,098
1.83%
💯
1,036
1.73%
😨
863
1.44%
🙊
677
1.13%
😭
620
1.03%
🎉
530
0.884%
16 further kinds
2,947
4.92%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60,458 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
30
across the posts below
Posts paid on
27
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tourdom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
4.70%
47 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
47
posts carrying an erid · 47 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
5,340
over 47 measured posts
Median views · rest
6,120
over 953 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2VSb5w4KvNE
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VSb5w7hQwk
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2VSb5wDRGH8
1
13 August 2026
13 August 2026
2VSb5wEg9vz
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
2VSb5wHuFUE
1
11 September 2026
11 September 2026
2VSb5wKaKeJ
1
14 September 2026
14 September 2026
2VSb5wKk4cJ
1
15 September 2026
15 September 2026
2VSb5wQ8zb4
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2VSb5wSfneE
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
2VSb5wXXvYz
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2VSb5wa2NEe
1
16 September 2026
16 September 2026
2VSb5waARVL
1
31 August 2026
31 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it. 35 further tokens are held for this entry and not listed here.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Всем привет из Петры! Как убедился админ, несмотря на спад иностранного туризма, главная достопримечательность Иордании не обделена вниманием гостей из Китая, Италии, Испании и других стран. Экскурсионные группы подтягиваются к 9 утра, и их много. Поэтому оптимально разместиться в городе на ночь. Например, в отеле Movenpick — он ближе ко входу.
План предлагаем такой: вечером идете в каньон и смотрите световое шоу, …
Подведем итоги вторника? День, как всегда, был насыщенный и интересный.
🔸 МВД рассказало об изменениях в загранпаспорте с 1 января. Главное – данные о детях перестанут вписывать в загранники россиян «с целью защиты прав граждан РФ на свободу передвижения».
🔸 Жительница Казани попала под статью, вернувшись домой из Китая со своими же вещами. Таможенникам не понравилось количество очков и серег в ее багаже.
🔸 На Бай…
«Почему отельеры ОАЭ думают, что они кому-то нужны по таким ценам? Минус 15–20% от прошлогоднего уровня. Надо минус 50%!» – сказал в интервью нашему порталу гендиректор сети агентств «Розовый слон» Алексан Мкртчян. Многие на российском рынке разделяют это мнение.
А как видят ситуацию «по ту сторону»?
У отельеров растет себестоимость услуг – цены на энергоносители повысились в два с лишним раза, бензин сейчас стоит б…
Турагенты подсказывают туроператорам, как можно буквально озолотиться. Алексан Мкртчян, руководитель сети агентств «Розовый слон», обратил внимание на то, что ни из одного южного аэропорта России нет ни одного рейса в Китай: ни в Пекин, ни в Шанхай, ни в Санью.
«Вот это страшнейшая проблема. Поэтому любой туроператор, который сейчас поставит рейсы на тот же Хайнань, заработает огромные деньги».
Все новости в MAX.
«Аэрофлот» опроверг информацию о вспышке туберкулеза в своем офисе на Арбате.
Ранее в некоторых телеграм-каналах появились сообщения о том, что персонал офиса компании перешел на масочный режим работы. Это связано с выявлением туберкулеза у некоторых сотрудников. К 22 сентября было известно о пяти заболевших.
В авиакомпании настаивают, что подобные новости не соответствуют действительности.
«Среди сотрудников указ…
Сочи теряет позицию главного аэропорта юга России, особенно для тех, кто собирается за границу.
«Мы посчитали: примерно на 7–8 закрытий Сочи приходится только одно в Краснодаре. И на 100 “ковров” в Сочи – одно ограничение в небе над Минводами. Естественно, мы сейчас делаем ставку на вылеты из этих городов, а рейсы из Сочи предлагаем в последнюю очередь», – рассказал Крыше ТурДома Алексан Мкртчян, руководитель сети а…
Вьетнамский Дананг, судя по последним видео, сносит и заливает. Кадры драматичные: воющий ветер, очереди ливня, падающие зонтики. Впрочем, все не так страшно, как кажется на первый взгляд, – через час уже солнце. А до некоторых районов курорта, непогода и вовсе не добралась.
Тем не менее дождь – одна из главных тем, которые обсуждают сейчас туристы во Вьетнаме. Некоторые сильно расстраиваются, мол, надо же было в та…
Теперь найти работу в авиакомпании можно не только по узкому профилю. «Ижавиа» начала набирать сотрудников в мобильную огневую группу для защиты аэропорта Ижевска от БПЛА.
«При вступлении в группу трудоустраиваем в АО “Ижавиа”. Сотрудники заступают на двухмесячное боевое дежурство. После этого предоставляется оплачиваемый семидневный отпуск. Далее — на два месяца работа по профессии в “Ижавиа”. Либо, по желанию, — о…
История об идеальном путешествии
Турагенты каждый день держат в голове десятки задач, дедлайнов и самых разных пожеланий клиентов. Команда Островок B2B ценит эту работу и вклад турагентов в развитие индустрии путешествий, поэтому к Дню туризма подготовила необычный сюрприз — тематический мультфильм.
В центре истории — профессиональный турагент Ольга, которой предстоит разобраться в множестве пожеланий клиента, учес…
В зимнем расписании аэропорта Краснодара появились рейсы авиакомпании Nesma в Хургаду: судя по всему, перевозчик намеревается летать туда в феврале-марте 2027 года по воскресеньям и четвергам.
Правда, пока в продаже нет ни билетов на эти рейсы, ни туров с этим перевозчиком. Но, как сказали Крыше ТурДома туроператоры, «такая возможность не исключена».
Как думаете, полетят или нет?
Все новости в MAX.
Почти 1 тыс. серебряных украшений на 5 млн рублей обнаружили таможенники Шереметьево в багаже туриста из Китая.
Мужчину из Гуанчжоу остановили на «зеленом» коридоре в ходе выборочного контроля. С помощью рентген-машины в его багаже выявили 965 ювелирных изделий, упакованных в зип-пакеты.
Пассажир пояснил, что все товары предназначены для личного пользования. Модник однако.
Все новости в MAX
«Началось. Раньше кафе и рестораны на набережной в Сириусе были просто закрыты, теперь их сносят», – сообщают из Сириуса. На кадрах и видео в соцсетях – разобранные павильоны, кучи строительного хлама.
Печалятся, впрочем, немногие. Большинство приветствует очистку первой линии, тем более что на месте точек общепита должны появиться крутые парки. Подробнее написали на ТурДоме.
Видео matveu_s
@tourdom
👏37👍18🤣10❤9🤯5
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,007 posts we hold for @tourdom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@tourdom edited 22 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
19 September 2026
Polls
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Интересует ли вас отдых в ОАЭ этой осенью или предстоящей зимой?
Да, уже приобрели тур или авиабилеты6%
Возможно, но только если увидим привлекательные цены28%
Нет, опасаюсь17%
Не интересует это направление в принципе26%
Отдых нет, но как транзит в другие страны – возможно11%
Хочу узнать результаты опроса17%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Все чаще люди пытаются принимать важные решения в своей жизни, доверившись ИИ. А давайте проверим – с выбором отдыха тоже? Расскажите, как подбираете себе туры?
Доверяю подбор турагенту под мои запросы14%
Самостоятельно читаю отзывы и обзоры интересных отелей60%
Прошу ИИ подбирать для меня варианты5%
Ориентируюсь на рекомендации друзей3%
Напишу свой вариант в комментариях1%
Хочу посмотреть результаты17%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Какими авиакомпаниями вы предпочитаете летать за границу?
Российскими – доверяю им больше7%
Зарубежными – предпочитаю их39%
Без разницы – главное цена, расписание и удобство37%
Зависит от направления15%
Хочу узнать результаты опроса7%
The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 53 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 18 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
atorus.ru @atorus · 45,561 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 27 August 2026
Onlinetours @onlinetours · 64,825 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 21 August 2026
Туту @tutu_travel · 499,922 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 9 August 2026
Улететь @uletet_1 · 97,243 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 16 August 2026
Ну чё, народ, погнали! @ranarod · 123,532 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Уважаемые пассажиры @dearpassengers · 23,369 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 18 September 2026
Travelbelka.ru - путешествия, авиабилеты, туры @travelbelka · 70,815 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 3 September 2026
Tripster — необычные экскурсии @tripsterofficial · 50,824 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 25 August 2026
Travel News @travelnews24 · 118,352 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
Coral Travel @CoralTravel · 38,252 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 31 August 2026
На Ссаных Матрасах @thedukeofjermuk · 24,832 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
CRUCLUB|КРУИЗней не бывает - морские круизы @cruise_cruclub · 27,063 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 11 September 2026
Авиаторщина @aviatorshina · 120,787 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
По SUти @aeroflot_pr · 50,594 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
FrequentFlyers @frequentflyers · 23,013 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 September 2026
Уральские авиалинии @uralairlines · 99,651 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 3 September 2026
Трэвелхакер @trvlhacker · 23,218 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 September 2026
Intourist PRO @intouristpro · 22,151 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 September 2026
Гриша про Путешествия @grisha_travel · 25,605 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 13 September 2026
Travel media @tr_media · 153,544 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Travelgram | Путешествия @travelgram · 64,433 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 21 August 2026
Типичный Визовик @tipical_vizovik · 29,045 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Nordwind Airlines @nordwindairlines_official · 39,499 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Куда Слетать✈️✈️✈️ @kuda_sletatru · 29,188 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 8 September 2026
This channel appears in 66 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крыша ТурДома” (@tourdom), 79,942 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tourdom.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.