Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Париж не стоит мессы

Channel

Париж не стоит мессы

@deadpoetscom

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,414subscribers

+245 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001637297462
TypeChannel
Username@deadpoetscom
DescriptionVictoria Kataeva ig: wwiccoffee сотрудничество — @kattzdrs регистрация в РКН: https://gosuslugi.ru/snet/67a30d16dc130259d59da49d
Created8 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/deadpoetscom

Growth

19,16919,46819,318.56 August 2026 — 19,169 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,169 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,191 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,190 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,196 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,181 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,186 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,291 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,352 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,377 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,385 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,413 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,455 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,462 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,466 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,461 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,468 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,456 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,434 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,430 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,420 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,414 subscribers19,4146 August 202629 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net +245. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,124–19,513 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 17:5819,414-6
28 Aug 2026, 17:4319,420-10
27 Aug 2026, 18:1719,430-4
26 Aug 2026, 18:3319,434-22
25 Aug 2026, 15:2319,456-12
24 Aug 2026, 15:2819,468+7
23 Aug 2026, 01:0319,461-5
21 Aug 2026, 11:2319,466+4
20 Aug 2026, 12:3519,462+7
19 Aug 2026, 13:4519,455+42
18 Aug 2026, 12:3419,413+28
17 Aug 2026, 13:4619,385+8
16 Aug 2026, 04:0519,377+25
14 Aug 2026, 17:3819,352+61
13 Aug 2026, 06:1919,291+23
12 Aug 2026, 09:1219,268+82
11 Aug 2026, 07:0319,186+5
10 Aug 2026, 04:1319,181-15
9 Aug 2026, 07:1219,196+6
8 Aug 2026, 07:1519,190first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.6%
avg views ÷ 19,414 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,350
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 August 2026
Posts held19 (26 July 202627 August 2026)
Views total74,950
Reactions total3,683
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 00:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,610
Videos
109
Links
127

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

5,237 reactions across 19 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5,237100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,237reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 27 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
217
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 19 we hold a reading for · 47%
Most on one post
103
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @deadpoetscom. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 26 July 2026 to 27 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

27 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈2,410 views129 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

THE COST OF EXCELLENCE Второй раз в жизни я выступаю креативным директором съемки. Первый, когда в кадре не я, а великолепная балерина, выпускница академии Большого театра Анастасия Томпсон. За кадром — команда, в том числе Екатерина Малыгина, фотограф Анастасии Мироновой и PREDUBEZHDAI, и сотрудничающая с Большим театром дизайнер одежды Анастасия Симеютина. Я с большим уважением отношусь ко всему академическому,

129

25 Aug 2026, 18:21 UTC≈3,530 views103 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Hot girl summer is over, art girl autumn is coming В преддверии сезона арт-ярмарок думаю о том, чтобы подтянуть свои знания в области искусства. Если вы тоже — рекомендую курс Синхронизации «Как стать искусствоведом». Его ведут сотрудники Пушкинского музея, Третьяковской галереи и МГУ — и за 10 месяцев вы не просто прокачаете насмотренность, а научитесь понимать искусство любой эпохи, анализировать произведения, пи

103

25 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC≈3,570 views199 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

199

21 Aug 2026, 13:30 UTC≈6,060 views201 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

“Nocturnal animals”, 2016 Фильм Тома Форда, не очень удачно (на мой взгляд) переведенный на русский язык как «Под покровом ночи», напугал меня, когда я впервые увидела его в 15 лет. Пересмотрев сейчас, не могу перестать восхищаться тем, как здесь композиционно оформлено страдание. Форд переводит боль в язык геометрии и света, а треш-нуар вымышленного Техаса стал моим новым визуальным определением страха. Но больше

201

20 Aug 2026, 12:34 UTC≈5,280 views497 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

черные розы + белые пионы = моя любимая комбинация🦇🤍

497

17 Aug 2026, 11:35 UTC≈7,070 views298 reactions103 Starsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Милитари-жакет “VICTORY” — первая женская вещь бренда (A) SERGEI DESEV за всю его историю, сделанная вручную в единственном экземпляре специально для меня. Силуэт вдохновлен военной формой, а название… ну, вы поняли. 🦇

298

15 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈6,240 views238 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Будни: опоздала на предпремьеру спектакля; заказала вкуснейший филе-миньон на завтрак в 15 часов утра в Интеллигенция 2.0; день спасен!

238

14 Aug 2026, 16:34 UTC≈5,840 views247 reactions2 Starsread 25 August 2026
Photo

небольшой q&a — приветствую всех новоприбывших!

247

9 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈6,780 views127 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Лучший подарок за последнее время мне сделали Studio Slow… …4 великолепных нишевых парфюма! I. Irévérent Histoires de Parfums Название переводится как «непочтительный». Контрастный аромат, где под обманчиво спокойной поверхностью таится скандал. II. Voix Humaine 8 Filippo Sorcinelli Интерпретация остановки (8) в органе Собора Парижской Богоматери. Из названия («человеческий голос») следует попытка передать теплу

127

9 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC≈5,640 views274 reactions1 Starread 21 August 2026
Photo

В Петербурге, помимо моей основной цели, о которой сделаю отдельные посты, удалось вновь попрактиковать фланирование. Напомню ключевые черты: I. Отсутствие маршрута II. Позиция наблюдателя III. Эстетизация повседневности

274

8 Aug 2026, 12:05 UTC≈4,390 views366 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

За время своего отсутствия здесь я успела получить диплом продюсера и съездить в Петербург, чтобы посетить одно культовое место, попасть в которое уже невозможно, и отснять для вас контент оттуда… С чего бы начать?

366

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @deadpoetscom. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 77,573 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Синхронизация
@Synchronews · 48,890
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 26 August 2026
еврейка у микрофона
@urfavjewishgirl · 44,057
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Жена Маяковского💍 | Литература ЕГЭ | Фариша Князева
@litumsch · 49,029
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Париж не стоит мессы” (@deadpoetscom), 19,414 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/deadpoetscom.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.