Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
39 measurements spanning 69 days, net +836. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 48,369–50,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Oct 2026, 17:18
49,847
+83
13 Oct 2026, 06:36
49,764
+252
8 Oct 2026, 23:17
49,512
+205
4 Oct 2026, 16:16
49,307
+350
26 Sept 2026, 14:17
48,957
+150
17 Sept 2026, 13:40
48,807
+65
15 Sept 2026, 10:01
48,742
+55
13 Sept 2026, 18:21
48,687
-32
11 Sept 2026, 21:59
48,719
-33
9 Sept 2026, 11:20
48,752
+73
6 Sept 2026, 04:57
48,679
+117
3 Sept 2026, 23:16
48,562
-265
2 Sept 2026, 15:34
48,827
-325
1 Sept 2026, 15:04
49,152
-17
31 Aug 2026, 13:48
49,169
+40
30 Aug 2026, 15:14
49,129
+100
29 Aug 2026, 11:55
49,029
-7
28 Aug 2026, 14:17
49,036
+26
27 Aug 2026, 16:03
49,010
-33
26 Aug 2026, 12:54
49,043
first reading
Engagement
278 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
10.1%
avg views ÷ 49,847 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,050
102 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.05%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
102
of 278 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 October 2026
Posts held
278 (3 August 2026 – 13 October 2026)
Views total
514,600
Reactions total
15,702
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Oct 2026, 09:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1h 22m
Average length
3m 35s
Measured directly from 23 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
40,143 reactions across 275 posts, in 37 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
19,658
49.0%
❤🔥
7,122
17.7%
💘
2,728
6.80%
🔥
2,441
6.08%
😱
1,394
3.47%
💋
1,111
2.77%
💯
921
2.29%
👍
777
1.94%
🍓
742
1.85%
🥰
652
1.62%
custom 5235773813400019716
375
0.934%
😢
321
0.8%
👀
264
0.658%
🤯
200
0.498%
🤩
141
0.351%
😨
132
0.329%
😍
125
0.311%
🎉
124
0.309%
🙏
121
0.301%
🕊
113
0.281%
17 further kinds
681
1.70%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 275 of the 278 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 40,143 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Пришла к вам сегодня ещё с пользой по Итоговому сочинению🙏
Выше расписание уроков от Саши Долгих, все они посвящены ИС!
Первый урок уже в этот четверг, на нем вы узнаете, с чего начать подготовку и какие произведения предстоит прочитать🐈
А также проведет РОЗЫГРЫШ своего курса 🎁 Подробности Саша расскажет сам у себя в тгк
Мини чек-лист "Что нужно ТОЧНО пронализировать перед экзаменом"?🤩
Забирайте себе, обязательно проверяйте, насколько полно вы можете раскрыть каждый из пунктов чек-листа💋
Очень буду рада вашим реакциям!!👁️
Что нужно знать для ЕГЭ про "На дне"?🌊
Краткая сводка, более подробно будем разбирать завтра в 18:00 на бесплатном открытом уроке!!
🪷Род: драма
🪷Жанр: драма
🪷Направление: реализм
🪷Темы: смысл жизни; жизнь «дна», правда и ложь, надежда, человеческое достоинство, свобода, сострадание, судьба.
🪷Проблемы: Что лучше, истина или сострадание? Способен ли человек к нравственному выживанию? Нужно ли воспринимать жизнь тако…
В идеальной картине мира у вас должны быть в голове подобные планы, как в двух постах выше, по всем темам сочинений 🌟
💋 Если вы понимаете, что самостоятельно такой объем узнать и отработать сложно, подготовка со мной пока что открыта по этой ссылке 💗
Что она даёт:
💋 помогает избавиться от «белого листа», когда не знаешь, что писать
💋 помогает отработать написание большого кол-ва сочинений в рамках времени экзамена
…
Ключевые цитаты для аргументации позиции героев:
🪷Бубнов: «По-моему — вали всю правду, как она есть! Чего стесняться?»
🪷Лука: «Она, правда-то, — не всегда по недугу человеку... не всегда правдой душу вылечишь...»
🪷Сатин: «Надо уважать человека! Не жалеть... не унижать его жалостью... уважать надо!»
Принимаю спасибо реакциями!!❤️
🟦 Подготовка к ЕГЭ с Дашей Королёвой
Начинаем с вами изучать "На дне" М. Горького 🐱
💋Разбираем, как написать сочинение на тему:
Какие философские вопросы поставлены в пьесе М. Горького «На дне»?
Это 11 сочинение было на реальном ЕГЭ 2026 (досрочный период)!
💋План сочинения:
Ключевая мысль вступления: центральным философским вопросом пьесы становится спор о правде и лжи.
🪷Бубнов говорит, что не умеет врать, и считает, что ложь бессмысленна, так как в…
Саша Долгих уже начинает готовить вас к Итоговому сочинению в своём тгк 😇
Если вы ищите хорошую подготовку — переходите к нему, в канале будут аргументы и произведения 🥺🎀
ВСЕ ТЕМЫ ИТОГОВОГО СОЧИНЕНИЯ С 2014 ГОДА
Собрал для вас новый файл, в котором есть все 1733 официальные темы итогового сочинения, которые давали на реальных экзаменах с 2014 года(!!!)
Более того! Я проанализировал все темы и разделил их на 22 смысловых блока, которые покрывают практически все возможные направления на ИС.
Внутри файла вы найдёте:
— все темы по годам и направлениям
— ключевые широкие темы, которые …
Хочу разобрать с вами пьесу подробнее! 💋 Какой план на ближайшие дни:
💋 С 12 по 15 октября в этом канале будет:
💋 план сочинения по пьесе, который можно использовать на реальном экзамене
💋 дайджест «что нужно для ЕГЭ» по этому произведению
💋 открытый урок по пьесе, на котором мы полностью проанализируем произведение, чтобы вы знали, как использовать его на ЕГЭ
💋 приятный БОНУС: как использовать эту пьесу на Итогово…
🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩
Всем спасибо за урок❤️🐈 Вы сегодня большие умнички!!
💋разобрали жанр и лит.направление;
💋сюжет (важные фрагменты для сочинений);
💋образы героев;
💋идеи, проблематику;
💋темы сочинений (будьте внимательны: №5 - темы ОГЭ, №11 - темы ЕГЭ)
Запись урока доступна по ссылкам выше❤️
❤77❤🔥17🍓4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 278 posts we hold for @litumsch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@litumsch edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
30 August 2026
Most recent edit
30 August 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 25 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 135%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 125%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Делаем опрос по теории?👀
💋 Герой оказывается в исключительных обстоятельствах, одинок, противопоставлен обществу, а природа отражает его внутреннее состояние. Какое направление?
Классицизм12%
Реализм17%
Романтизм72%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 278 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 13 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Настя Ахматова | Литература ЕГЭ 10 класс | Ахматова рекомендует | Умскул @nastya_literature · 10,881#1
Лилия между строк | Литература ЕГЭ | Сотка @liter100ege · 9,928#2
Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул @dolgih_umrus · 179,939#3
Мать стобалльников | ЕГЭ по литературе | Фариша Князева и Мария Коршунова @korshunova100ballov · 27,369#4
Дама с собачкой | Виля Брик | Литература ЕГЭ СМИТАП @VilochkaBrik · 11,510#5
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мать стобалльников | ЕГЭ по литературе | Фариша Князева и Мария Коршунова @korshunova100ballov · 27,369 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул @dolgih_umrus · 179,939 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Даша Шарит | Даша Королёва | ОГЭ литература 2027 | Умскул @lublu_litry · 54,372 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Шерин Келли Английский ЕГЭ 2027 Умскул | ONE WAY to ЕГЭ @eng_sherin · 46,649 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Надежда на пять | Математика ОГЭ 2027 | Надежда Ковалевская | Умскул @nadya_matem · 151,573 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 13 August 2026
Алёна Туренко | Литература ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @lit_oge100points · 21,514 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 September 2026
Даша Устинова | Русский ЕГЭ | Сотка @rus100ege · 29,096 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку @TatiashkaEGE · 54,911 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Русский ЕГЭ | Вера Флекс 100балльный репетитор @vera_egeflex · 78,747 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
Аля Виноградова | История ЕГЭ 2027 | Такая вот история | Умскул @alyahist · 52,599 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Новая Школа ЕГЭ | Кружок @kruzhok_ns · 62,128 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Аделия Адамова | ЕГЭ Профильная математика 2027 | Акулы математики 🦈 @adeliyamath · 64,410 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Настя Малова | Обществознание ЕГЭ Умскул @umnastya · 95,838 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Мария Вельф | В гостях у русички | Русский ЕГЭ 10 класс | Умскул @welf_rus · 71,093 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Умскул @umschool_official · 135,224 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 August 2026
ОГЭ на excellent | Алина Максимова ОГЭ английский | Умскул @alinameng · 82,424 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Артур Шарафиев | Профильная математика ЕГЭ 2027 | Турик Матанит | Умскул @art_matanit · 142,375 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Русский с Лией | 5-8 классы | Умскул @liyamiddleschool · 41,126 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 31 August 2026
Евгений Тьюринг | ЕГЭ 10 класс Профильная математика 2026 | Гении математики | Умскул @geniusesofmath · 33,839 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Никита Равич | История ЕГЭ 2028 Умскул | Следствие вели историки @ravichhist · 23,115 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 September 2026
Даша Львова | История ОГЭ 2027 | Львиные истории | Умскул @lion_history · 50,559 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026
Вика Ланская | Информатика ЕГЭ 2027 | ИнфаВикуся | Умскул @infa_vikusya · 45,519 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
This channel appears in 22 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Даша Королёва | Литература ЕГЭ | Умскул” (@litumsch), 49,847 subscribers as measured 14 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/litumsch.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.