614 моих учеников сдали ЕГЭ на 100 баллов, 4335 выпускников сдали экзамен на 80+ и более 2000 учеников на 90+ баллов!
Хочешь так же? Пиши 👉🏻 @assistant_liliyabulgarina_bot
РКН: № 7147466087
Created
24 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 90 days, net +1,758. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,380–10,482 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 12:00
9,819
-38
1 Nov 2026, 03:50
9,857
-26
29 Oct 2026, 13:20
9,883
+8
26 Oct 2026, 05:17
9,875
-3
23 Oct 2026, 14:20
9,878
+12
20 Oct 2026, 18:19
9,866
-20
17 Oct 2026, 08:05
9,886
-42
14 Oct 2026, 02:35
9,928
-69
9 Oct 2026, 15:20
9,997
-50
5 Oct 2026, 07:16
10,047
-77
29 Sept 2026, 01:15
10,124
+195
18 Sept 2026, 21:42
9,929
+488
14 Sept 2026, 19:01
9,441
+297
11 Sept 2026, 03:40
9,144
+632
6 Sept 2026, 02:40
8,512
+774
1 Sept 2026, 11:48
7,738
-26
29 Aug 2026, 02:07
7,764
-23
25 Aug 2026, 18:33
7,787
-28
22 Aug 2026, 21:22
7,815
-25
19 Aug 2026, 17:12
7,840
first reading
Engagement
84 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.83%
avg views ÷ 9,819 subscribers
Avg views / post
671
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
30
of 84 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
84 (21 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
20,115
Reactions total
1,577
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 21:09 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,860
Videos
≈133
Links
≈755
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,795 reactions across 81 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 54.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,516
54.2%
💘
284
10.2%
❤🔥
271
9.70%
🔥
210
7.51%
💋
103
3.69%
💯
84
3.01%
🍓
76
2.72%
🥰
63
2.25%
😍
34
1.22%
🤩
33
1.18%
🎉
29
1.04%
👍
17
0.608%
😱
12
0.429%
💔
11
0.394%
🕊
11
0.394%
⚡
10
0.358%
🌚
10
0.358%
😢
7
0.25%
😁
3
0.107%
🤯
3
0.107%
5 further kinds
8
0.286%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 84 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,795 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 30 posts held from the last 30 days (6.67%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔥Суперважно для заданий 5 и 10!
Две неочевидные вещи, которые вы должны проверить, прежде чем писать ответ на эти задания в бланк. Это необходимо для получения нормальных баллов по К2 (привлечение текста, самый дорогой критерий, весит 4 первичных балла)
1️⃣При указании на сходства убедитесь, точно ли то, о чем вы говорите, есть в обоих произведениях? Очень часто вижу на практиках что-то в духе:
«Песни в обоих произ…
Почему отец отправляет Петра Гринёва служить не в Петербург, а в Оренбург?
Хочет, чтобы сын начал службу с самого низкого чина24%
Считает, что в столице Пётр быстро испортится58%
Получил приказ отправить сына именно туда3%
Хочет, чтобы Пётр служил под командованием Миронова16%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🥰17💯5❤1💔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 84 posts we hold for @liter100ege. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 10 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Гринёв обвиняет Швабрина в предательстве коменданта7%
Швабрин отказывается вернуть Гринёву деньги0%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 84 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@liter100ege named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rian_ru named in 1 post, 29 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Мать стобалльников | ЕГЭ по литературе | Фариша Князева и Мария Коршунова @korshunova100ballov · 27,982 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 September 2026
Даша Королёва | Литература ЕГЭ | Умскул @litumsch · 50,859 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Даша Устинова | Русский ЕГЭ | Сотка @rus100ege · 30,827 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 16 September 2026
Сотка | Твоя платформа @sotkaonline · 24,881 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 22 September 2026
Таня Коваль. ЕГЭ по русскому языку @TatiashkaEGE · 61,601 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Алёна Туренко | Литература ОГЭ и ЕГЭ | 100балльный репетитор @lit_oge100points · 21,810 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 24 September 2026
Даша Шарит | Даша Королёва | ОГЭ литература 2027 | Умскул @lublu_litry · 56,332 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 26 August 2026
Настя Малова | Обществознание ЕГЭ Умскул @umnastya · 98,758 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 17 August 2026
Русский ЕГЭ | Вера Флекс 100балльный репетитор @vera_egeflex · 91,634 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
ЕГЭ 2027 | ЕГЭ 100БАЛЛОВ @egeoge100ballov · 28,088 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 September 2026
Глазами филолога | Неля Лотман | Русский язык ЕГЭ СМИТАП @nelya_lotman · 22,263 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 27 September 2026
Александр Долгих | Русский ЕГЭ 2027 | ИТОГОВОЕ СОЧИНЕНИЕ | Грамотным быть модно | Умскул @dolgih_umrus · 193,254 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Новая Школа ЕГЭ | Кружок @kruzhok_ns · 60,224 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Шерин Келли Английский ЕГЭ 2027 Умскул | ONE WAY to ЕГЭ @eng_sherin · 48,962 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лилия между строк | Литература ЕГЭ | Сотка” (@liter100ege), 9,819 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/liter100ege.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.