3 measurements spanning 2 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,547–1,548 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:55
1,547
-1
15 Sept 2026, 17:22
1,548
no change
15 Sept 2026, 16:47
1,548
first reading
Engagement
7 posts held, back to 10 September 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.0%
avg views ÷ 1,547 subscribers
Avg views / post
247
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
13.7%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 7 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 September 2026
Posts held
7 (10 September 2026 – 15 September 2026)
Views total
1,729
Reactions total
237
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Sept 2026, 17:22 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
59s
Average length
15s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
237 reactions across 7 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
169
71.3%
custom 5224528463737673428
38
16.0%
🏆
23
9.70%
💔
7
2.95%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 10 September 2026 to 15 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Неделя выдалась очень насыщенной, если не сказать сумасшедшей ⭐️🩵
Я все ещё никак не отойду от встречи с Владимиром Георгиевичем, поделилась этим в тиктоке и неожиданно на меня подписалось больше 700 человек. Люди в комментариях делятся своими историями о первой встрече, а кто-то наоборот только открывает для себя это имя, и мне безумно приятно быть частью этой цепочки, проводником.
Ника в честь годовщины устроил …
по вечерам на танго снова аншлаг, кажется осень и это направление, как нельзя хорошо мэтчатся друг с другом 💔🤩🤩🤩
p.s. не очень довольна тем, как станцевала в этот раз, но всё-таки отдельные элементы стали получатся чуть лучше
// 128bpm studio
Сели вместе почитать новые книги, в итоге оба читать не хотим…
Ника читает «король, дама, валет» и когда он говорит мне «у Набокова такой необычный слог», я естественно вспоминаю мною прочитанные произведения и с улыбкой на лице соглашаюсь, что слог у него очень особенный. Он так виртуозно играет словами, слепляет воедино то, о чем и не подумаешь, подбирает самые точные образы, с душой поэта. Оказалось, Ника имеет в…
пока я и вплавь, и брассом добираюсь за новыми книжками, тут придумали маршрут поинтереснее 🤎🤎
Яндекс Книги узнали у современных писательниц, какие места в столице их вдохновляют. Получился список нишевых точек на карте столицы, отвечающий на вопрос жителей и гостей столицы «куда сходить на выходных?».
📍Почитать подробнее и выбрать маршрут для ближайшей прогулки можно здесь
Мини-обзор на часть пришедших с логобука книг 🎞💋
“three summers” Margarita Libertaki
Роман о взрослении трех сестер, живущих в Афинах в преддверии Второй Мировой. Семейные скелеты в шкафу, поиск женской свободы, природа и чувственность. // это моя попытка открыть для себя новое имя; планировала читать этим летом, но логобук решил иначе
* В своё время роман получил восторженный отзыв от Альбера Камю и по его рекомен…
об этом мои будущие дети будут слушать не меньше раз, чем Анастасия Волочкова рассказывает про его величество случай и Сулеймана Керимова.💔🌟
p.s. теперь в планах побывать на лекции вживую и я буду the coolest & the happiest >>>
Очень ждала этот день и вот он настал! .⊹˖ᯓ★. ݁₊
Вы бы знали как тряслись мои руки, пока я протягивала свой экземпляр книги и как вылетели все слова из моей головы при виде длинного коридора очереди из людей, объединенных любовью к астрономии и одному из самых ярких ее популяризаторов.
Спасибо «Озеру» за такую встречу! 🦢❤️🩹
❤32custom 522452846373767342813
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @delixstudy. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
читающий домик 🛋 @chitayushiydomik · 24,600 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
будни читателя🍂 @butterbruh · 22,846 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 19 September 2026
встретимся в кафе де мари🩰 @mmarssikk · 24,627 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“незнакомка с книгой в руках 🌙🤎” (@delixstudy), 1,547 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/delixstudy.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
