Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for THE ARK

Channel

THE ARK

@ark_gallery

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,617subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002033083432
TypeChannel
Username@ark_gallery
Created5 April 2024measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ark_gallery

Topic

Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

4,6174,6714,6447 August 2026 — 4,671 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,671 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,669 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,668 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,661 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,660 subscribers20 August 2026 — 4,656 subscribers23 August 2026 — 4,652 subscribers26 August 2026 — 4,647 subscribers29 August 2026 — 4,641 subscribers1 September 2026 — 4,639 subscribers6 September 2026 — 4,633 subscribers11 September 2026 — 4,628 subscribers14 September 2026 — 4,624 subscribers18 September 2026 — 4,617 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,609–4,679 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 19:584,617-7
14 Sept 2026, 16:174,624-4
11 Sept 2026, 09:204,628-5
6 Sept 2026, 06:574,633-6
1 Sept 2026, 19:494,639-2
29 Aug 2026, 09:044,641-6
26 Aug 2026, 11:564,647-5
23 Aug 2026, 15:484,652-4
20 Aug 2026, 12:454,656-4
17 Aug 2026, 13:144,660-1
14 Aug 2026, 00:464,661-7
11 Aug 2026, 02:514,668-1
8 Aug 2026, 07:414,669-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:484,671no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:394,671first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 5 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 6 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1,117 reactions across 15 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,117100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,117 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 5 March 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ark_gallery. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 March 2026 to 15 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 12:45 UTC≈1,250 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Василий Кандинский, «Прогулка», 1903

65

2 May 2026, 10:47 UTC≈2,540 views98 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кузьма Петров-Водкин, «Весна», 1935

98

6 Apr 2026, 12:25 UTC≈3,210 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эдуар Мане, «Балкон», 1868—1869 Рене Магритт, «Перспектива II: Балкон Мане», 1950

74

3 Apr 2026, 12:08 UTC≈3,520 views110 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эрик Булатов, «Насрать», 2018 – С этим словом связана целая история из моей молодости. Это был 1957 год. В Самарканде, я еще был студентом, я познакомился с удивительным человеком, графом Сергеем Николаевичем Юреневым. Он был в лагере, после лагеря не стал возвращаться в Россию, работал археологом в Средней Азии. Это был удивительный человек, такой Дон Кихот, длинный, худющий, с бороденкой, как полагается, с палкой

110

30 Mar 2026, 12:23 UTC≈2,040 views93 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Пабло Пикассо, «Маленький желтый пикадор», 1889

93

26 Mar 2026, 13:20 UTC≈2,670 views120 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Винсент ван Гог, «Цветущая ветка миндаля в стакане и книга», 1888

120

25 Mar 2026, 12:45 UTC≈2,190 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Марк Ротко, Без названия (Черное на сером), 1970 Мартин Хайдеггер определили феноменологию как придание метафизического значения даже самым повседневным переживаниям. Во всех человеческих ситуациях присутствует отсутствие, то есть навязчивое ощущение «ничто». Оно проявляется в переживании тревоги, когда привычные структуры и смыслы мира разрушаются. Ясно выраженная идея «ничто» в центре многих работ Ротко. Цвет Ротк

52

18 Mar 2026, 13:31 UTC≈2,230 views67 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эдгар Дега, «Четыре ивы», 1865

67

16 Mar 2026, 14:55 UTC≈2,080 views63 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Эгон Шиле «Лирик», 1911 «Скорбь», 1922 Эгон Шиле исследовал в своих работах то, как наше тело раскрывает внутренние переживания. Фигуры в его произведениях воплощают состояние души или эмоцию. Во многих работах изображены обнажённые фигуры. Без одежды и каких-либо ассоциаций с современной жизнью обнажённое человеческое тело напрямую передаёт первобытные чувства.

63

13 Mar 2026, 15:26 UTC≈2,250 views72 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Люсьен Фрейд, «Девушка в постели», 1952

72

12 Mar 2026, 15:13 UTC≈2,170 views58 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Ян ван Эйк, «Благовещение», 1434 Ван Эйк написал часть приветствия Гавриила прямо на картине золотом: «Ave gratia plena», что в переводе с латыни означает «Радуйся [Мария], благодатная». Мария отвечает: «Ecce ancilla domini», или «Се, раба Господня» [Вот я, перед тобой, готова услышать и исполнить]. Ван Эйк изобразил слова Марии перевернутыми — они обращены напрямую Богу на небесах.

58

11 Mar 2026, 13:36 UTC≈1,910 views48 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Джордж Сигал, «Танцоры», 1971

48

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @ark_gallery. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Александр Пушкин. Лайфстайл
@pushkins_life · 26,107
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 September 2026
Фёдор Достоевский. Лайфстайл
@dostoevskiy_life · 38,088
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 31 August 2026
Лев Толстой. Лайфстайл
@tolstoy_life · 59,873
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Антон Чехов. Лайфстайл
@chekhov_life · 74,380
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“THE ARK” (@ark_gallery), 4,617 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ark_gallery.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.