Политолог. Глава центра изучения военных и политических конфликтов. Действительный государственный советник Российской Федерации.
№ 4778023596
Контакт [email protected]
Created
23 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 33% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
60 measurements spanning 91 days, net -73. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 53,214–53,943 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 02:59
53,745
-12
4 Nov 2026, 03:45
53,757
-2
3 Nov 2026, 02:21
53,759
-6
2 Nov 2026, 02:38
53,765
-1
1 Nov 2026, 00:01
53,766
-6
30 Oct 2026, 21:41
53,772
-10
29 Oct 2026, 18:45
53,782
-20
28 Oct 2026, 17:49
53,802
-1
27 Oct 2026, 17:58
53,803
+20
26 Oct 2026, 15:39
53,783
+50
25 Oct 2026, 16:09
53,733
+19
24 Oct 2026, 12:38
53,714
-5
23 Oct 2026, 15:10
53,719
-3
22 Oct 2026, 14:39
53,722
-1
21 Oct 2026, 06:57
53,723
+25
20 Oct 2026, 07:37
53,698
+36
19 Oct 2026, 10:10
53,662
+73
18 Oct 2026, 11:40
53,589
+40
17 Oct 2026, 14:21
53,549
+35
16 Oct 2026, 15:56
53,514
first reading
Engagement
648 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.1%
avg views ÷ 53,745 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,600
195 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
198
of 648 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
648 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
1,481,470
Reactions total
28,541
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 23:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,230
Videos
≈4,620
Links
≈3,890
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20h 45m
Average length
4m 11s
Measured directly from 298 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
98,570 reactions across 617 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
39,927
40.5%
🔥
17,509
17.8%
🤬
11,226
11.4%
❤
10,615
10.8%
🤔
5,911
6.00%
😁
5,490
5.57%
👏
2,725
2.76%
👌
2,097
2.13%
😱
1,213
1.23%
🤯
1,146
1.16%
🎉
347
0.352%
😢
149
0.151%
🤩
86
0.087%
🆒
65
0.066%
🥰
56
0.057%
😍
6
0.006%
😘
2
0.002%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 633 of the 648 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102,093 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 648 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
40
across the posts below
Posts paid on
23
of 633 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @aklintsevich. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 648 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 35 of 198 posts held from the last 30 days (17.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Уолл-стрит сорвала стоп-кран
На американских биржах буря. За первые 50 минут торгов в четверг рынок акций США потерял более 2 трлн долларов. Nasdaq в моменте падал больше чем на 5%, S&P 500 - почти на 4%, индекс полупроводников - на 11%, худший результат с марта 2020 года.
Ирония в том, что накануне рынок праздновал победу демократов на выборах в Конгресс: Dow Jones показал лучший послевыборный день за 44 года. Про…
🇪🇺 Европа может не успеть перевооружиться к 2030 году
Еврокомиссия сама признала, что план военной готовности ЕС к 2030 году «под угрозой». Об этом говорится в проекте рабочей программы Комиссии на 2027 год, оказавшемся в распоряжении Euronews.
Деньги есть: в 2025 году страны ЕС потратили на оборону рекордные 418 млрд евро - на 20% больше, чем годом ранее. Но эти расходы так и не превратились в боеспособные и совме…
🖥️ Кирилл Дмитриев на встрече с Меланией Трамп поблагодарил первую леди США за содействие в урегулировании гуманитарного кризиса в Алешках и организации воссоединения российских и украинских семей.
Спецпредставитель президента России рассказал, что Владимир Путин лично давал необходимые поручения для обеспечения режима прекращения огня, благодаря которому удалось организовать доставку гуманитарной помощи и эвакуацию…
Трамп проиграл Конгресс. Что это значит для России
Демократы взяли обе палаты, и с января у Трампа будет враждебный парламент. Для Москвы это означает, что американский партнёр по переговорам становится заметно менее надёжным. Посмотрим, где это скажется.
Закон Грэма. В октябре Трамп одной подписью приостановил большую часть санкций, которые сам же утвердил в сентябре. Демократы собираются переписать закон так, что…
Нанимайте адвокатов: демократы взялись за криптобизнес Трампа
Демократы готовятся расследовать криптобизнес Трампа и его семьи, пишет Bloomberg. Они хотят выяснить, какие финансовые выгоды президент и его родственники получили от связей с криптовалютными компаниями.
Такая возможность появилась после промежуточных выборов: демократы получили большинство в обеих палатах Конгресса. Новый состав приступит к работе в ян…
Британия и Франция репетируют ввод войск на Украину
Британские и европейские военные, если их разместят на Украине, получат право открывать ответный огонь при нападении российских сил. Об этом пишет The Guardian со ссылкой на западных официальных лиц.
Речь идёт о Многонациональных силах для Украины (Multinational Force Ukraine, MNF-U) под руководством Лондона и Парижа. По данным газеты, они не будут зависеть от аме…
Urals дороже 100 долларов: нефть возвращается в 2014 год
В октябре средняя цена российской нефти Urals составила 101,46 доллара за баррель. Выше сотни она не поднималась с 2014 года.
Главная причина - война в Иране. Поставки из стран Персидского залива стали непредсказуемыми, страховка и фрахт танкеров резко подорожали. На этом фоне российские маршруты в Азию выглядят надёжнее: они не зависят от узких мест вроде Ор…
Не я один предположил проблемы у Маска, инвесторы уже побежали из его ценных бумаг.
FT пишет, что поражение республиканцев на промежуточных выборах в США уже обошлось Илону Маску более чем в 60 млрд долларов. После того как демократы получили контроль над Конгрессом, инвесторы начали продавать акции компаний, связанных с бизнесменом - бумаги Tesla упали на 5,7%, а SpaceX - на 7,6% на ранних торгах.
👍76🤔62❤11🔥6🤯3🤩1😁1🆒1
Showing the 12 most recent of 648 posts we hold for @aklintsevich. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Политическая Россия 🇷🇺 PolitRussia @politrussiacom · 23,950 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 16 September 2026
БАГДАСАРОВ @sbagdasarov · 47,589 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
КазакоV @ale_kazakov · 47,147 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 26 August 2026
ПАНКИН @Pankin_Ivan · 23,578 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Андрей Гурулёв / депутат Государственной Думы @agurulev · 55,545 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 23 August 2026
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев @dtlive · 67,356 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
МЕСТО ВСТРЕЧИ 📺 @mesto_vstrechi_ntv · 145,357 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 16 August 2026
Алексей Бобровский @alexbobrowski · 37,001 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
Роман Бабаян @robabayan · 29,280 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Вечер с Владимиром Соловьевым и 60 минут @shilopravdy · 29,573 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ @DDrobnitski · 79,058 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
ШЕЙНИН @GardeZ66 · 249,585 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 10 August 2026
СЕРГИЕНКО Владимир @vvsergienko · 41,370 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 September 2026
САРДАРЯН @sardaryanh · 49,214 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 25 August 2026
Олеся Лосева @Losevatalks · 38,344 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 31 August 2026
Артамонов: Оборона России @nationaldef · 114,879 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ВЯЧЕСЛАВ НИКОНОВ @VA_Nikonov · 30,708 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 6 September 2026
Кузичев @a_kuzichev · 84,532 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 August 2026
Килинкаров Спиридон @KilinkarovSpiridon · 29,268 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 8 September 2026
Ростислав Ищенко official @rostislavishchenko · 52,504 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 24 August 2026
Евгений Спицын @SpicynEY · 28,813 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
ДОКТОР СОСНОВСКИЙ @dr_alex_sosnowski · 113,724 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
Сергей Михеев @ironlogica · 209,599 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
Константин Сивков official @Sivkov_K · 23,296 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“КЛИНЦЕВИЧ” (@aklintsevich), 53,745 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/aklintsevich.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.