Единственный и официальный tg канал Ростислава Ищенко
Boosty: https://boosty.to/rostislavishchenkoofficial
А⁺ https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=67641d468e552d6b54f646d2®istryType=bloggersPermission
#KXLYA
Рекламу не размещаем!
Created
12 April 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
59 measurements spanning 91 days, net -604. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 52,407–53,200 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 15:27
52,504
+6
4 Nov 2026, 18:51
52,498
-4
3 Nov 2026, 17:26
52,502
-5
2 Nov 2026, 16:19
52,507
-19
1 Nov 2026, 17:45
52,526
-1
31 Oct 2026, 17:09
52,527
-7
30 Oct 2026, 19:20
52,534
-3
29 Oct 2026, 18:47
52,537
-7
28 Oct 2026, 18:01
52,544
-18
27 Oct 2026, 16:18
52,562
-14
26 Oct 2026, 16:59
52,576
-17
25 Oct 2026, 16:09
52,593
+1
24 Oct 2026, 18:11
52,592
-12
23 Oct 2026, 16:20
52,604
-16
22 Oct 2026, 14:15
52,620
-8
21 Oct 2026, 10:16
52,628
-8
20 Oct 2026, 07:17
52,636
-2
19 Oct 2026, 05:57
52,638
-12
18 Oct 2026, 09:09
52,650
-3
17 Oct 2026, 08:50
52,653
first reading
Engagement
234 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 184 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 52,504 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,800
77 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
77
of 234 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
234 (26 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
906,920
Reactions total
14,643
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 23:37 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈326
Videos
≈1,150
Links
≈3,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3h 53m
Average length
10m 36s
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
48,791 reactions across 232 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35,822
73.4%
❤
7,712
15.8%
👏
3,411
6.99%
🔥
1,846
3.78%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 234 of the 234 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49,508 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 234 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 77 posts held from the last 30 days (5.19%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Добрый день, уважаемые читатели!
В закрытом канале вышел новый выпуск еженедельной авторской передачи:
Ростислав Ищенко на примере нескольких реальных и гипотетических сценариев развития событий показал как хорошие политики предугадывают ходы своего оппонента, избегают расставленных им ловушек, работают с рисками и достигают успеха ценой наименьших потерь:
• Как прогнозы работают на самом деле? Чем прогноз отличае…
🎙 Что ждёт Украину после выборов в США и как пыточная под Киевом повлияет на настроения в ВСУ – Ищенко
Политолог, обозреватель Украина.ру Ростислав Ищенко в проекте «Ищенко о главном» прокомментировал поражение республиканцев на промежуточных выборах в Конгресс США, оценил перспективы Зеленского и Украины, объяснил, как скандал с пыточной под Киевом отразится на настроениях в ВСУ, а также рассказал о значении Дня на…
‼‼‼ Что ждёт Украину после выборов в США и как пыточная под Киевом повлияет на настроения в ВСУ – Ищенко
Политолог, обозреватель Украина.ру Ростислав Ищенко в проекте «Ищенко о главном» прокомментировал поражение республиканцев на промежуточных выборах в Конгресс США, оценил перспективы Зеленского и Украины, объяснил, как скандал с пыточной под Киевом отразится на настроениях в ВСУ, а также рассказал о значении Дня …
Политолог Ищенко сравнил киевский режим с преступными организациями в Сомали
Политолог уверен, что режимы, подобные украинскому, живут максимум 30-50 лет, под их гнетом государство деградирует и наступает время вынужденных реформ.
Полный выпуск смотрите в ВК и RUTUBE
📌 Подписаться на Радио Sputnik в МАКС
Напоминаю: сегодня в 14:00 — эфир на Радио Sputnik
Острые вопросы внутренней и внешней политики России — по вторникам в 14:00 «Спорим с Ищенко».
Задавайте вопросы в комментариях к трансляции: https://rutube.ru/video/1e34b1314c655e98dc479d872cfdc104/
Подписывайтесь на Радио Sputnik https://t.me/radio_sputnik, чтобы не пропустить, они напомнят.
🔔🔔🔔 Сегодня в программе Сергея Веселовского «Политотдел» на телеканале «Крым 24» — публицист Ростислав Ищенко
Истекающая кровью Европа ведёт неравный бой с Россией, которая на войну не пришла.
Что там у них происходит?
Откуда вдруг, словно из ниоткуда, появились миллионы протестующих граждан Европейского Союза, недовольных своими правительствами?
Неужели «вот это вот всё» — дело рук коварного Путина, когда-то давно…
#ПОЛИТОТДЕЛ
02.11.2026 в 15.15
"Бой с тенью"
Сегодня в программе Сергея Веселовского "Политотдел" на телеканале "Крым24" - публицист Ростислав Ищенко.
Истекающая кровью Европа ведёт неравный бой с Россией, которая на войну не пришла.
Что там у них происходит?
Откуда вдруг, словно из ниоткуда, появились миллионы протестующих граждан Европейского Союза, недовольных своими правительствами?
Неужели "вот это вот всё" -…
В студии радио Радонеж - политолог Ростислав Владимирович Ищенко. Ведет передачу директор радиостанции Никифоров Евгений Константинович.
Эфир от 29.10.2026 21:00
https://radonezh.ru/radio/2026/10/29/21-00
🧭сейчас в 20:36 прямой эфир с Сергеем Марданом.
Подключайтесь (трансляции в видео и аудио).
🎬 Rutube
🎬Telegram
🎧Радиопоток
👍144❤28👏13🔥5
Showing the 12 most recent of 234 posts we hold for @rostislavishchenko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
2
vacant every time we have ever looked
@rostislavishchenko named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@radio_sputnik named in 72 posts, 8 August 2026 – 4 November 2026
@sputniklive named in 16 posts, 2 September 2026 – 3 November 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 24 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Полковник Трухан @ladik2005 · 30,108 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 7 September 2026
Сергей Михеев @ironlogica · 209,599 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
ДРОБНИЦКИЙ @DDrobnitski · 79,058 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
Вечер с Владимиром Соловьевым и 60 минут @shilopravdy · 29,573 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 September 2026
Евгений Спицын @SpicynEY · 28,813 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
Константин Сивков official @Sivkov_K · 23,296 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 18 September 2026
Михаил Хазин Публикации @khazinmikhail · 51,448 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Перспектива @perspektyva369 · 30,944 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 6 September 2026
Владимир Аватков @avatkov · 24,935 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
ДТ Д.Куликов-VZ-Т.Сергейцев @dtlive · 67,356 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Социософт.ТВ @sociosoft · 20,175 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 September 2026
АНДРЕЙ ВАДЖРА @andreyVajra · 33,008 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 4 September 2026
ВОЕНКОР МАРАТ ХАЙРУЛЛИН @voenkorkhayrullin · 31,504 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 5 September 2026
КЛИНЦЕВИЧ @aklintsevich · 53,745 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 August 2026
Дмитрий Перетолчин — «Картина Мира» @ndayclub · 23,530 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 18 September 2026
ЗАУГЛОМ @ZaUglom2024 · 55,658 Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
Михаил Хазин предупреждал @mikhailkhazin · 58,646 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 22 August 2026
Павел Щелин. Официальный канал. @common_sen · 82,711 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
ПЕСКЕ + PESKE @apeske · 30,629 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
Алексей Бобровский @alexbobrowski · 37,001 Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 1 September 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Ростислав Ищенко official” (@rostislavishchenko), 52,504 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rostislavishchenko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.