Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ход Конева

Channel

Ход Конева

@knightsmove

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

41,111subscribers

-102 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001356403768
TypeChannel
Username@knightsmove
DescriptionКанал ведёт лирический герой. Все совпадения с Михаилом Коневым случайны. Рассказы не основаны на реальных событиях и носят юмористический характер. 18+ По вопросам рекламы, да и по любым вопросам @m_konev Регистрация Роскомнадзоре: https://clck.ru/3QE
Created16 April 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 August 2026
Measurements held17
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/knightsmove

Growth

41,11141,21341,1625 August 2026 — 41,213 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,213 subscribers6 August 2026 — 41,201 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,193 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,185 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,194 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,182 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,180 subscribers12 August 2026 — 41,183 subscribers13 August 2026 — 41,171 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,170 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,178 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,160 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,134 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,132 subscribers20 August 2026 — 41,117 subscribers21 August 2026 — 41,111 subscribers5 August 202621 August 2026
17 measurements spanning 16 days, net -102. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 41,096–41,228 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Aug 2026, 13:2641,111-6
20 Aug 2026, 15:2441,117-15
19 Aug 2026, 17:2441,132-2
18 Aug 2026, 16:1341,134-26
17 Aug 2026, 13:0641,160-18
16 Aug 2026, 07:5641,178+8
14 Aug 2026, 16:1741,170-1
13 Aug 2026, 09:2441,171-12
12 Aug 2026, 06:1441,183+3
11 Aug 2026, 07:5341,180-2
10 Aug 2026, 07:4141,182-12
9 Aug 2026, 10:3241,194+9
8 Aug 2026, 09:1541,185-8
7 Aug 2026, 06:1141,193-8
6 Aug 2026, 04:4041,201-12
6 Aug 2026, 01:4841,213no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:2641,213first reading

Engagement

136 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 34 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.3%
avg views ÷ 41,111 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,630
136 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
136
of 136 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held136 (3 August 202621 August 2026)
Views total630,180
Reactions total11,536
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Aug 2026, 03:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
7,040
Videos
2,340
Links
4,010

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
17m 42s
Average length
51s

Measured directly from 21 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

10,370 reactions across 124 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣5,07348.9%
3,16330.5%
🔥9889.53%
👍3433.31%
🍾3333.21%
🍌2102.03%
😢1361.31%
🤬780.752%
🫡460.444%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 136 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,536reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

21 Aug 2026, 19:23 UTC≈1,270 views51 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Пятница. Вечер.

31🔥20

21 Aug 2026, 15:10 UTC≈1,710 views39 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Вы думаете, я ради шутки и словца пишу про наших юных героев-спортсменов? Дудочки! Сегодня не только душой, но и в рамках долгожданной личной встречи поздравил с Днём рождения Веронику Жерельникову - мировую рекордсменку в прыжках на роликах. Девушка-красавица прыгнула аж на 140 см (на 3 см выше предыдущего рекорда). Вот так выглядит гордость моей страны: стильная, яркая, молодая и во всех смыслах живая! Особенно п

32👍7

21 Aug 2026, 12:42 UTC≈2,060 views35 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

СказочноеБали прямо в Коломенском. Замечательное, кстати, место! Пляж, бассейн, и виза не нужна.

🔥2312

21 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC≈2,150 views49 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

32🤣13🍌2🍾2

21 Aug 2026, 08:24 UTC≈2,510 views30 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Отношения строить сложнее, потому что любовь - самая таинственная и безумная штуковина на свете. Познать её сложнее, чем обосновать существование высших сил. Найти своих и успокоиться - вот благо главное на свете (как завещал великий Балабанов). А Бехтереву слушать интересно, знает толк. Особенно сквозь призму Машиных вопросов!

18👍8🔥4

21 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC≈2,550 views7 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Forwarded from @incrussiamediaPhoto

💔 Свайп в одиночество. Почему нам стало сложнее строить отношения? Дейтинг-приложения превратили знакомства в подбор по характеристикам, соцсети продают готовые правила, а любую неудобную черту все проще объяснить ярлыками вроде «абьюзер» или «нарцисс». В новом выпуске «Делай!» психиатр и психотерапевт Наталья Бехтерева рассказала Марии Лапук, почему людям стало труднее знакомиться. ↗️ Читайте полную версию интерв

7

20 Aug 2026, 23:27 UTC≈3,170 views133 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Быть с женщиной - счастье. Быть с любимой женщиной - дистиллированное счастье. Быть с женщиной любящей - обретение Бога в себе. Про бытие с мужиками ничего не знаю. Надеюсь, девушки, поэзии с нами не меньше.

116🍌13👍3🤣1

20 Aug 2026, 18:44 UTC≈3,570 views49 reactionsread 22 August 2026

Гроза надвигается на Москву. Большая гроза.

🍌35🔥131

20 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈3,660 views243 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Плевали с Любой мы на псов из Vogue.

194🍾38🔥8🤣3

Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @knightsmove. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 3,643 of 1,570,450entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Захар печатает…
@zakhar_plus · 2,106
3 posts
БП онлайн
@bponline · 100,281
2 posts
Небелый воротничок
@nwcollar · 71
2 posts
вэри гуд пёрсон
@americanpostchannel · 74
1 post
Art Is New Sexy 🍓
@artisnewsexy · 24,976
1 post
Отдаем по готовности!
@ASTrenin29ru · 4,001
1 post
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,971,898
1 post
Ev.il84
@evil1984 · 8
1 post
IdaGalich
@GALICH_onok · 287,995
1 post
гиг пиг ниг
@geekshit · 6,301
1 post
Кирилл Кашин 😎 Хэппи менеджмент
@happykashin · 778
1 post
Как выжить среди идиотов
@idiotsarearound · 3
1 post
экзистенциальное кафе «духота»
@journikkitalk · 17
1 post
Отель Лазурит Архыз hotel & spa
@lazurit_arkhyz · 366
1 post
Marinin's 1.0
@Marinins1 · 23
1 post
марковонлайн
@markovonline · 3
1 post
ММ
@MMuraveinik · 47
1 post
восстановители режима
@molniya228 · 50
1 post
АЛИМЖАНЫЧ
@NeRichter · 316
1 post
Невеликий почин
@nevelikiypochin · 17
1 post
Никита Широбоков
@nikshirobokov · 24
1 post
Fashion_за_МКАДом
@oksana_shipovskikh · 256
1 post
ООО ЯДЕР
@OOOYader · 448
1 post
pit of shit
@pitofshit · 320
1 post
sa gat lo
@SaaGatLoo · 47
1 post
Сахалинцы в Москве
@sakhinmo · 186
1 post
Sklyarov Timur
@soplyarovtim · 31
1 post
Сука Любовь
@sukalyuba · 415
1 post
ГОЛУБЕВА+
@tochnogolubeva · 156
1 post
сончас
@u_nas_sonchas · 130
1 post
Мария Чадина
@vampishetchadina · 41,638
1 post
Ваша Белкова
@vashatb · 644
1 post
Just an opinion
@zopinion · 7
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 39 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

КИБЕРФРОНТ 🇷🇺ZА Россию🇷🇺
@cyber_frontZ · 62,011
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Business Storm
@brainsstorming · 62,803
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Мараховское время
@vmarahovsky · 60,738
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 22 August 2026
Точка роста
@TochkaUP · 232,506
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Тина Канделаки
@tikandelaki · 308,503
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
Легкий подъем
@EazyUP · 200,534
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Бойлерная
@boilerroomchannel · 231,978
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Деловой подход
@Businesslikes · 203,930
Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026

This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Конев, Михаил Андреевич (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…com/broadcast/pro-o-rus/|url-status=live}}. Автор Telegram-канала «[https://t.me/knightsmove Ход Конева]» и видеоблога «[https://www.youtube…”
read 16 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ход Конева” (@knightsmove), 41,111 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/knightsmove.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.