International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
11,300 average views per post against 15,085 subscribers — an engagement rate of 75.2%. Across the 15,983 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.63% and 17.8%, with a median of 9.06%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured
13 of 13 published in the window (0 exact, 13 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
147,430
Mature posts only
85.9% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 44 days, net +37. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,988–15,138 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:58
15,085
-4
16 Sept 2026, 08:19
15,089
+4
14 Sept 2026, 11:57
15,085
-2
12 Sept 2026, 23:40
15,087
-12
11 Sept 2026, 03:40
15,099
-22
8 Sept 2026, 05:22
15,121
+46
5 Sept 2026, 00:37
15,075
-3
3 Sept 2026, 07:09
15,078
-5
31 Aug 2026, 21:25
15,083
-10
30 Aug 2026, 21:25
15,093
-5
29 Aug 2026, 22:08
15,098
-1
28 Aug 2026, 20:04
15,099
-4
27 Aug 2026, 21:13
15,103
+7
26 Aug 2026, 19:19
15,096
+13
25 Aug 2026, 21:47
15,083
+46
24 Aug 2026, 23:58
15,037
+4
23 Aug 2026, 07:59
15,033
+5
21 Aug 2026, 19:38
15,028
+19
20 Aug 2026, 19:03
15,009
+4
18 Aug 2026, 18:34
15,005
first reading
Engagement
64 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
75.2%
avg views ÷ 15,085 subscribers
Avg views / post
11,300
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.48%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 64 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
64 (25 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
147,430
Reactions total
708
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
8m 50s
Average length
8m 50s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,350 reactions across 62 posts, in 45 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
871
20.0%
🤔
523
12.0%
🔥
493
11.3%
🤬
369
8.48%
😁
351
8.07%
👍
342
7.86%
❤
295
6.78%
💊
223
5.13%
🤣
201
4.62%
🥴
147
3.38%
🖕
111
2.55%
🥱
83
1.91%
🤯
70
1.61%
🤪
56
1.29%
🦄
35
0.805%
🙈
32
0.736%
😢
22
0.506%
🐳
14
0.322%
😨
10
0.23%
🗿
9
0.207%
25 further kinds
93
2.14%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 64 of the 64 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,485 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 64 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В Иране обсуждают, действительно ли их по-прежнему поддерживает Китай Внутренняя политика в Иране сейчас весьма и весьма интересна, поэтому чтение иранских СМИ приносит иногда большие сюрпризы.
Так, например, офис спецпредставителя Ирана по делам Китая опровергает, что для визита в Китай спикера иранского парламента Галибафа Пекин якобы выдвигал Ирану некие условия. И прилежное следование агентством Fars канонам кла…
Сегодня на Восточном экономическом форуме президент Владимир Путин дал старт ряду крупных проектов, которые способны надолго задать вектор развития Дальнего Востока и всей страны. Как подчеркнул глава ВЭБ.РФ Игорь Шувалов (госкорпорация выступает одним из ключевых партнеров в реализации этих масштабных инициатив), важно поддерживать не просто экономически выгодные начинания, а те, что создают долгосрочные перспективы…
Зеленский анонсировал попытки Украины заблокировать гражданское авиасообщение в крупных городах России Шаг опрометчивый, и вполне возможно НЕ согласованный с Лондоном, ведь только сегодня новый британский премьер Бернэм заявил в парламенте, что "мы не стремимся к эскалации". Операция "M&Ms", придуманная как пиар-пугалка экс-министром обороны Федоровым (кстати, любопытно, как он сейчас будет комментировать это заявлен…
Саммит ШОС: Китай и Казахстан продвигают встречу участников ШОС по стратстабильности. В том числе и по Украине В официальной части саммита ШОС в Бишкеке, несмотря на типично восточную словесную пышность, можно увидеть очертания очень интересных процессов уже в ближайшем будущем.
Начинает, как и следовало ожидать от неформального "хозяина" ШОС, Китай.
Говоря о международных и региональных горячих точках, таких как У…
По поводу встречи главы Минфина России Силуанова со своим американским коллегой Бессентом на министерском саммите G20 и якобы обсуждении ими Украинского урегулирования ситуация следующая.
Команда Трампа втихую пригласила Силуанова в США на это мероприятие и в результате его появление стало сюрпризом (и поэтому удобным инфоповодом) для европейцев.
О присутствии г-на Силуанова американские официальные лица публично н…
Кремль решил уйти на внешнеполитическом треке в медийную "тень" На прошлой неделе было очень хорошо видно, что Кремлю сильно надоели вопросы журналистов по триста раз на дню про переговорный трек по Украине.
В связи с чем субботний визит Лукашенко в Москву на встречу с Путиным прошел в оглушительной тишине с обоих (sic!) сторон. Для обычно весьма говорливого Лукашенко это совершенно нетипичное поведение. Поэтому Кре…
Интервью главы МИД России Сергея Лаврова РБК уже раскритиковано в русском телеграме вдоль и поперек. Электорально это интервью, мягко говоря, не в пользу первого номера партсписка "Единой России", поэтому возникает вопрос, зачем вообще понадобилось это интервью.
Тут видится два варианта. Во-первых, та часть Кремля, которая все же видит необходимость разъяснить публике причины и результаты визитов главы ЦРУ и главы д…
В опросах ФОМ снятое с выборов «Яблоко» вторую неделю подряд продолжает тащить все другие партии, кроме КПРФ, на электоральное дно. У «Единой России» не «взлетел» съезд, на котором кратко выступил Путин. Упали даже «Новые люди», в пользу которых первоначально частично ушёл ситуативный электорат «Яблока».
Рост количества неопределившихся — верный признак, что это именно из-за потери чувства новизны и интриги люди пер…
Кремль и Трамп второй день подряд практически в унисон пытаются девальвировать значимость визита главы ЦРУ в Москву.
Никакого послания не было и ничего необычного не произошло. — Трамп в интервью Axios
Сам глава ЦРУ, кстати, пока публично свой визит в Москву никак не прокомментировал. Но вряд ли он скажет иное, чем Трамп или глава СВР Нарышкин.
Встреча состоялась, но в этом нет ничего необычного. В практике деятель…
Китай прямо предупредил Трампа, что визит Си Цзиньпина в США 24 сентября может и не состояться, если американцы начнут экономически "изолировать" Иран от Китая.
Стороны должны реализовать важные договоренности, достигнутые главами двух государств, сосредоточиться на позитивной повестке, должным образом контролировать разногласия, устранить помехи и преодолеть препятствия для контактов на высоком уровне. - министр ин…
Кремлевские модераторы выборов в Госдуму откатили назад решение о снятии с выборов в Самаре депутата от КПРФ Матвеева. Скорее всего, это связано с решимостью КПРФ устроить в ответ в судах "эффект Стрейзанд" для "Единой России".
Очевидно также, что проявленная тем самым модераторами выборов гибкость связана и с тем, что согласно свежим соцопросам КПРФ прочно закрепилась на втором месте и в случае продолжения третиров…
Про "сценарный пучок" на фоне визита главы ЦРУ в Москву очень точно отмечено. В Москве многие к этому "сценарному пучку" не готовы, поэтому сразу появляются вбросы через РИА "Новости", что США и Иран якобы договорились о новом "прекращении огня". Хотя на поверхности там лежит только предварительно согласованный между Ираном и Оманом вариант по Ормузскому проливу. Эти вбросы как бы отменяют торги с Рэдклиффом по Иран…
❤8💯7👍2🤪1
Showing the 12 most recent of 64 posts we hold for @plutovstvo007. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@plutovstvo007 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
3 September 2026
Most recent edit
3 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 97 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@plutovstvo007 named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@sputniklive named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Пятилетка @pyatiletka111 · 51,793 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 25 August 2026
Комитетчик @kmnedr · 21,189 Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 24 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Чисто для фиксации” (@plutovstvo007), 15,085 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plutovstvo007.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.