Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Рамиль Харисов

Channel

Рамиль Харисов

@rrharisov_live

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

51,435subscribers

+4,883 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001370095923
TypeChannel
Username@rrharisov_live
DescriptionОснователь агентства «Щенки Медиа» Медиатехнолог, политтехнолог. Канал о медиа, политике и личных размышлениях По рекламе: @bosteleg Поспорить с автором: @rrharisov Регистрация в РКН: https://clck.ru/3EgdAa
Created23 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/rrharisov_live

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

43,200 average views per post against 51,435 subscribers — an engagement rate of 84.1%. Across the 8,379 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,624–99,993 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 21.0%, with a median of 10.6%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured32 of 32 published in the window (0 exact, 32 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,383,400
Mature posts only84.1% over 32 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers51,435 measured 18 September 2026
Cohortb31623:rus · 8,379 channels · p10 2.52% · p25 5.06% · p50 10.6% · p75 21.0% · p90 35.8%
Position in cohort99.451th percentile · 8.0× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.061% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageRussian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

35,64155,11945,3805 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,552 subscribers6 August 2026 — 46,490 subscribers7 August 2026 — 46,433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 46,321 subscribers9 August 2026 — 46,261 subscribers10 August 2026 — 46,179 subscribers11 August 2026 — 46,094 subscribers12 August 2026 — 46,004 subscribers13 August 2026 — 45,924 subscribers14 August 2026 — 45,837 subscribers16 August 2026 — 45,674 subscribers17 August 2026 — 45,499 subscribers18 August 2026 — 45,420 subscribers19 August 2026 — 45,235 subscribers20 August 2026 — 45,420 subscribers21 August 2026 — 42,478 subscribers22 August 2026 — 43,199 subscribers24 August 2026 — 43,080 subscribers25 August 2026 — 44,322 subscribers26 August 2026 — 45,030 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,641 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,970 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,828 subscribers30 August 2026 — 43,773 subscribers31 August 2026 — 46,588 subscribers1 September 2026 — 49,089 subscribers2 September 2026 — 55,119 subscribers4 September 2026 — 54,379 subscribers6 September 2026 — 52,173 subscribers10 September 2026 — 50,559 subscribers12 September 2026 — 50,843 subscribers14 September 2026 — 50,625 subscribers15 September 2026 — 51,090 subscribers18 September 2026 — 51,435 subscribers51,4355 August 202618 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 43 days, net +4,883. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,719–58,041 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 01:2051,435+345
15 Sept 2026, 20:5551,090+465
14 Sept 2026, 04:3850,625-218
12 Sept 2026, 09:1850,843+284
10 Sept 2026, 08:3650,559-1,614
6 Sept 2026, 23:3652,173-2,206
4 Sept 2026, 06:1854,379-740
2 Sept 2026, 16:0355,119+6,030
1 Sept 2026, 14:0549,089+2,501
31 Aug 2026, 10:4846,588+2,815
30 Aug 2026, 14:0843,773+2,945
29 Aug 2026, 10:4440,828-142
28 Aug 2026, 14:1740,970+5,329
27 Aug 2026, 13:4435,641-9,389
26 Aug 2026, 11:3845,030+708
25 Aug 2026, 12:1644,322+1,242
24 Aug 2026, 09:3643,080-119
22 Aug 2026, 20:3443,199+721
21 Aug 2026, 11:1842,478-2,942
20 Aug 2026, 14:3445,420first reading

Engagement

65 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 100 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
84.3%
avg views ÷ 51,435 subscribers
Avg views / post
43,300
32 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.179%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
32
of 65 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held65 (18 June 2026 – 22 September 2026)
Views total1,386,700
Reactions total2,477
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken24 Sept 2026, 17:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈607
Videos
≈177
Links
≈1,340

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 38m
Average length
14m 23s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,944 reactions across 64 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔1,11822.6%
💯1,01520.5%
👍98619.9%
👌3116.29%
❤2585.22%
👎2555.16%
🔥2224.49%
🤣1513.05%
👏1472.97%
🤬1122.27%
😁1112.25%
🤨821.66%
🎉681.38%
😢581.17%
🙏220.445%
🙈130.263%
😱80.162%
😡30.061%
🤝20.04%
🤯20.04%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,019 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
1.54%
1 of 65 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
27,000
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
29,900
over 64 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqvBS5fH118 August 202618 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 17:23 UTC≈89,700 views72 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

На форуме «Диалог о фейках 4.0» в НЦ «Россия» озвучили результаты исследования АНО «Диалог Регионы» о том, как дети и подростки используют нейросети. ИИ для них уже не отдельная технология и не экзотика, а привычный цифровой инструмент: им пользуются 94% опрошенных россиян в возрасте от 10 до 17 лет. Треть обращается к нейросетям каждый день, еще треть – хотя бы раз в неделю. Самый популярный сервис – «Алиса AI»: ее…

🤔26💯18👍15👎6🤬5🤨1🤯1

21 Sept 2026, 09:37 UTC≈26,500 views101 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Forwarded from @krasnodarskij_kray

ПОЧЕМУ ЕДИНАЯ РОССИЯ ПОЛУЧИЛА РЕКОРДНЫЙ РЕЗУЛЬТАТ НА ЭТИХ ВЫБОРАХ? Мы видим объединение вокруг президента и признание результатов работы партии за все последние годы. Завершившиеся вчера выборы депутатов Госдумы действительно продемонстрировали в первую очередь доверие людей к процессу. По стране явка стала рекордной — 56,66%, это выше, чем результат предыдущих кампаний. В Краснодарском крае тоже высокий результат …

💯35👎20🤔19👍14🤬5🙈4🔥2🤣1

21 Sept 2026, 09:04 UTC≈44,300 views70 reactionsread 24 September 2026

ЦИК объявил предварительные итоги выборов в Госдуму 2026 года. Осталось обработать 5% протоколов. Памфилова заявила, что финальные результаты объявят 25 сентября. Не буду пока подробно комментировать результаты: первое и второе места были очевидны («Единая Россия» и КПРФ). Основная борьба развернулась за третье и четвертое места – между ЛДПР и «Новыми людьми» – и началась еще в самом начале кампании, продолжаясь все…

💯22👍17🤔15👎9👌2🤨2❤1🤬1

21 Sept 2026, 07:25 UTC≈27,400 views72 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Как Юрий Трутнев оставил политтехнологов без работы «Единая Россия» продолжает серию стабильных побед президентского курса в ДВФО. И самое время проанализировать избирательную кампанию, в которое есть один нюанс. Показанные 54% за партию при явке более 51% – итог не классических политтехнологических маневров, а стабильной многолетней работы команды полпредства и самого Юрия Трутнева. Составляющие этой работы: – ст…

🤔30💯17👍14🤨4👌3❤1🤣1😡1

20 Sept 2026, 21:44 UTC≈27,400 views67 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

С президентом РАСО Евгением Минченко в эфире стрима «Щенки Медиа» на площадке Ночи выборов поговорили о том, что значат промежуточные итоги выборов в Госдуму. «Единая Россия» сохранила первое место, КПРФ удерживает второе, но теряет в общем количестве голосов, а за третье место борются ЛДПР и «Новые люди». Эту картину можно рассматривать как результат общего менеджмента кампании. Во власти существовал запрос на сохр…

💯31🤔12👍10👎6🤬5🔥2❤1

20 Sept 2026, 20:02 UTC≈27,500 views71 reactionsread 24 September 2026

За эти три дня в Москве было особенно хорошо видно, что угрозы выборам все больше уходят в цифровое пространство. Речь уже не только о возможных конфликтах или провокациях на участках. Фейки, дипфейки, информационные вбросы, кибератаки и попытки представить любой технический сбой как доказательство «паралича системы» становятся отдельной частью борьбы вокруг выборов. Чтобы ударить по голосованию и его восприятию, не…

🤔32👌18👎6💯5🤨3🤬3🙈2❤1

20 Sept 2026, 17:14 UTC≈27,500 views68 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Отношения России со странами СНГ остаются неоднородными, но общий вектор постепенно смещается в сторону более тесной региональной интеграции. Речь сразу о нескольких форматах: ЕАЭС, ОДКБ, ШОС и Союзном государстве России и Беларуси. Об этом мы поговорили с Виктором Бутом в эфире стрима «Щенки Медиа» на площадке Ночи выборов в РИА Новости. Этот процесс связан с формированием многополярного мира. Старые международные …

👏32👍12👎10👌6🤔4❤3🔥1

20 Sept 2026, 16:47 UTC≈27,500 views65 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Photo

🇷🇺Работа в рядах «Сталинских Соколов»: официальная зарплата от 600 000 рублей, разовая выплата при заключении контракта с МО РФ и дополнительные выплаты и льготы от государства Карьерный трек: 🔻600 000 руб на руки —Технический специалист; 🔻650 000 руб на руки — Инженер; 🔻750 000 руб на руки — Пилот; 🔻950 000 руб на руки — Штурман; 🔻До 1 000 000 руб на руки — Начальник групп. 🇷🇺 Будем бить противника как Жуков учил!…

💯35👏11👌8👍7🤬3🤔1

20 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈27,600 views59 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Мы с агентством «Щенки Медиа» начали трансляцию на Hочи выборов в пресс-центре РИА Новости. С экспертами, кандидатами и действующими (пока еще) депутатами в прямом эфире обсудим прошедшую избирательную кампанию в Госдуму, предварительные итоги голосования и перспективы работы IX созыва нижней палаты парламента. Подписаться на канал📱

🔥26👍17👌9❤5💯1🤨1

19 Sept 2026, 19:05 UTC≈46,500 views75 reactionsread 24 September 2026

Второй день наблюдаю за вбросом экзитполов по выборам в Госдуму. Технология старая, но эффективная. Инициаторы таких кампаний выводят свою партию выше конкурентов или ставят ее с ними на один уровень. Все зависит от цели: создать ощущение борьбы, усилить конкуренцию или показать, что одна сила наступает на другую. Собственно, в этом избирательном цикле идет борьба за второе и третье места. Вчера была распространена…

💯32🤔17👍15🤬6👎4🤨1

19 Sept 2026, 13:15 UTC≈84,400 views69 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

Посмотрел эпизод «Политической кухни» Бутиной с Захаровой. Он примечателен тем, что пресс-секретарь МИД впервые развернуто комментирует текст предпринимателя Мельниченко в Economist. Захарова развернула собственную конструкцию, которая сошлась с мельниченковской в главном: с Западом разговаривать можно и нужно, но с позиции субъекта, а не просителя. Тезис о «предсказуемости вместо симпатии» она не оспорила ни в одном…

🤔30💯18👍9👌5🤬3❤2👎2

18 Sept 2026, 12:38 UTC≈30,100 views75 reactionsread 24 September 2026
Video

«Адекватность сейчас становится главным премуществом кандидата». Сегодня на площадке московского «Места силы Новых людей» поговорили с советником Сарданы Авксентьевой, замруководителя фракции партии в Госдуме Евгенией Стуловой. B эфире стрима «Щенки Медиа» обсудили прошедшую кампанию и главные запросы избирателей к кандидатам. На этих выборах в Госдуму было уже недостаточно формального политического образа. Людям важ…

💯27👍16🤔12👎10👌4❤2🤬2👏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @rrharisov_live. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@rrharisov_live edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
4 September 2026
Most recent edit
4 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 83 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Рамиль Харисов” (@rrharisov_live), 51,435 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rrharisov_live.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.