Channel
@redacted6
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
1,051,722subscribers
+25,810 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.
| Telegram ID | -1001296934777 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @redacted6 |
| Description | Новости, мнения, сомнения. Сюда переехал канал «Котëл #6» после попытки захвата. В этом котле кипят все. Но теперь мы будем топить пожарче. Для связи: [email protected] @redacted6_bot |
| Created | 29 March 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 17 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/redacted6 |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 84% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @redacted6/13968 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 07:35 UTC | @boilerroomchannel/252154 Aug 2026, 09:00 UTC | 1.00 | 85 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @boilerroomchannel | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | 85 minutes | this entry (3–2) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 37 comparable posts for this entry, running 1 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @redacted6 — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 1,051,722 | +51,083 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 08:42 | 1,000,639 | -30,924 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 1,031,563 | -910 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 12:25 | 1,032,473 | +1,049 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 12:47 | 1,031,424 | +1,431 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 1,029,993 | -1,896 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:46 | 1,031,889 | -4,583 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:07 | 1,036,472 | -2,356 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:57 | 1,038,828 | +6,414 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:52 | 1,032,414 | +1,927 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 1,030,487 | +9,481 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:11 | 1,021,006 | -10,532 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:37 | 1,031,538 | +713 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 1,030,825 | -1,055 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:47 | 1,031,880 | +5,968 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 1,025,912 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:55 | 1,025,912 | first reading |
97 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 97 (1 August 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | 30,604,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 00:12 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
Computed from 12 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days: across 4of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.1 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 47.5% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 70.9% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 204,000 views — 19.4% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 231,400).
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /139947 Aug 2026, 19:32 UTC | 718 minutes – 4.0 hours old | 128,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 90,240 interp. → 3.0 hours: 97,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 18 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139937 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC | 1076 seconds – 5.2 hours old | 152,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 69,600 → 3.0 hours: 122,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 67 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139927 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC | 1411 minutes – 7.6 hours old | 157,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 78,846 interp. → 3.0 hours: 113,904 interp. → 6.0 hours: 142,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 57 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139917 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC | 1513 minutes – 8.5 hours old | 211,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 84,400 → 3.0 hours: 101,000 → 6.0 hours: 186,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 3.2 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139907 Aug 2026, 13:17 UTC | 1758 minutes – 10 hours old | 203,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 77,800 → 3.0 hours: 125,000 → 6.0 hours: 137,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139897 Aug 2026, 08:12 UTC | 253 minutes – 15 hours old | 200,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 96,286 interp. → 3.0 hours: 117,000 → 6.0 hours: 123,000 → 12 hours: 195,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 74 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139887 Aug 2026, 07:11 UTC | 2514 minutes – 16 hours old | 233,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 101,650 interp. → 3.0 hours: 125,000 → 6.0 hours: 132,000 → 12 hours: 223,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.7 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /139876 Aug 2026, 20:24 UTC | 4061 seconds – 27 hours old | 239,000 views ~no reaction reading | 60 minutes: 106,000 → 3.0 hours: 122,000 → 6.0 hours: 158,000 → 12 hours: 192,000 → 24 hours: 223,000still climbing at last reading | 223,000measured | 2.4 hours |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Авария в московским метро! Утром 22 августа разрушилась часть облицовки и попадала лепнина на станции «Комсомольская». Речь здесь идет не столько об отделке, сколько о капитальных конструкциях. Как и «Динамо», а также ряд других станций, «Комсомольская» находится в аварийном состоянии, разваливается и представляет угрозу для пассажиров. Однако ни мэрия Сергея Собянина, ни Дептранс евромиллиардера Максима Ликсутова и …
В Англии, в графстве Йоркшир несколько человек погибло, когда полицейская машина столкнулась с VW Passat нарушителя (и, вероятно, другими авто) во время скоростного преследования. Число жертв выясняется. СМИ сообщают, что на месте происшествия утром работали 14 реанимобилей. UPD. Погибло 7 человек, включая 2 полицейских.
от телеграм-агентства Теле Стрим БОРИС ЧЕРНЫШОВ о том, что Киевский режим боится даже российских мультиков: «Зеленский ввёл санкции против создателей «Маши и Медведя». На десять лет. Сам мультсериал на Украине назвали «угрозой национальной безопасности». Даже немного неловко за украинскую национальную безопасность. Если ей уже угрожают Маша и Медведь, значит, дела у неё совсем плохи. Причём Медведя ещё можно попыта…
Так и лежит уже несколько дней база данных московского ГАИ. Права не поменять, машину на учет не поставить. Лишенцы катаются по городу с фальшивыми правами и никто не может их проверить. Передают, что происшествие всерьез засекретили, с сотрудников взяли расписки. Что же там случилось? Водителям начальство велело говорить, что «перерублен кабель» . Оттого и нет доступа к БД. Да кто ж его перерубил? Версия, с учетом …
Вмешается ли в дележку добывающего супер-актива Рамзан Кадыров? Миллиардер Муса Бажаев, его племянник Дени Бажаев, а также другие представители олигархического чеченского клана делят горнорудную (а ранее нефтяную) компанию «Альянс». Драгметаллы, редкоземы, необходимое промышленности сырье на сотни млрд $ – все это «Альянс». Когда-то фирму создал брат Мусы и отец Дени Зия Бажаев, но еще в 2000-м году он погиб в стра…
В Австралии кто-то взломал серверы энергетической компании Origin Energy и украл, кроме прочего, БД 900 тыс частных клиентов (по другим данным, 2 млн из общего числа 4.8 млн). Примерно 15 тыс украденных комплектов документов принадлежат силовикам и госслужащим. Ушло все, включая пароли, адреса, телефоны, а также – частично или полностью – номера карт. В любом случае, что бы ни говорили представители фирмы, номера кар…
🏗 В Китае когда-то богатейшего человека в Азии, бывшего владельца рухнувшей девелоперской компании Evergrande приговорили к пожизненному заключению. Господин Хуй Ка Ян, которого в российских СМИ политкорректно называют «Хуэй», также лишен всего имущества. Наказаны финансово и получили тюремные сроки сыновья бизнесмена и еще более 50 ответственных сотрудников, а также партнеров фирмы. Холдинг Evergrande для китайског…
Новости сегодня 🎤Хохлы — с бензином Доктор политических наук, главред сетки тг-каналов Игорь Скурлатов пишет о том, что «хохлы — с бензином, электричеством (которое даже экспортируют за границу от переизбытка), газом, ежемесячными дотациями на индивидуальные счета от союзников, а россияне оказываются в неприятной ситуации». Он отметил, что «как бы не хорохорились чиновники Правительства РФ, комментируя на грани этиче…
Мэр Екатеринбурга Алексей Орлов, верятно, очень любит, когда его вся страна называет человеком критичечки неумным. Видимо, поэтому в уральской столице вместо Преображения Господня и Яблочного Спаса районные власти навязывают населению какой-то «Яблочный фест» (видимо, по мотивам). Где гостям предлагают почему-то пожирание плова и других среднеазиатских блюд. Видимо, для Орлова и К⁰ это традиция, отличная от русских о…
от телеграм-агентства Теле Стрим Сибиряк об опыте наших ближайших географических и ментальных соседей – Казахстане на примере выборов в Мажелис: «Сами выборы, если говорим про последнее голосование в Мажилис, были конкурентными по двум причинам. Во-первых, меньшее, по сравнению с Россией, количество мандатов, что повышает ценность работы парламентария, ужесточает внутрипартийные критерии для выдвижения в списки и по…
🏗 Пустых домов глазницы снятся в кошмарах российским девелоперам и чиновникам. По наблюдениям редакции R6, участники рынка в холодном оцепенении смотрят на динамику продаж строящегося и уже возведенного жилья, как космонавты на сломанном корабле смотрят на пылинку в невесомости: куда же она в конце концов полетит, к Земле или от нее? Дальнейшее снижение продаж даже для строительных компаний федерального уровня означа…
Так, к размышлению, заметил, что каналы https://t.me/ZeRada1 и https://t.me/rezident_ua часто делают ошибки в глаголах с использованием мягкого знака. Странно, но факт, сами почитайте. Хотя это самое простое правило на мой взгляд 😊. Просто ответить на вопросы что делать и что делает 😎
Showing the 12 most recent of 97 posts we hold for @redacted6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@redacted6 edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Citation-graph rank — 6,116 of 1,584,142entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 126 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@redacted6 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 21 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
19 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“REDACTED P6 (КОТËЛ #6)” (@redacted6), 1,051,722 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/redacted6.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.