National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 52% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
58 measurements spanning 91 days, net +569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,726–22,628 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 10:59
22,408
-14
4 Nov 2026, 09:06
22,422
-5
3 Nov 2026, 09:46
22,427
-6
2 Nov 2026, 08:10
22,433
+10
1 Nov 2026, 11:25
22,423
-10
31 Oct 2026, 13:09
22,433
-13
30 Oct 2026, 12:09
22,446
-2
29 Oct 2026, 13:29
22,448
-7
28 Oct 2026, 10:54
22,455
-7
27 Oct 2026, 13:49
22,462
-4
26 Oct 2026, 14:36
22,466
-1
25 Oct 2026, 13:34
22,467
-9
24 Oct 2026, 15:00
22,476
-7
23 Oct 2026, 17:06
22,483
-2
22 Oct 2026, 18:39
22,485
+3
21 Oct 2026, 17:36
22,482
-14
20 Oct 2026, 11:26
22,496
-3
19 Oct 2026, 11:27
22,499
-3
18 Oct 2026, 13:57
22,502
-4
17 Oct 2026, 12:45
22,506
first reading
Engagement
494 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
6.08%
avg views ÷ 22,408 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,360
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.30%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 494 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 106 of 107 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
494 (4 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
145,697
Reactions total
1,882
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 02:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈17,000
Videos
≈18,000
Links
≈12,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
12h 20m
Average length
2m 15s
Measured directly from 328 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
8,024 reactions across 476 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,814
35.1%
❤
1,830
22.8%
🔥
1,094
13.6%
🙏
784
9.77%
🫡
331
4.13%
🤬
251
3.13%
💩
157
1.96%
😁
154
1.92%
🤔
140
1.74%
❤🔥
86
1.07%
😡
79
0.985%
⚡
65
0.81%
💊
37
0.461%
😨
32
0.399%
😢
30
0.374%
🤮
29
0.361%
🤩
20
0.249%
👏
17
0.212%
🥴
14
0.174%
✍
13
0.162%
12 further kinds
47
0.586%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 487 of the 494 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,078 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 494 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 490 we hold a reading for · 1%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Lunay14. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 494 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 107 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Ещё одно доказательство того, насколько сильно и быстро меняется война. Периодически можно встретить информацию, что дроны-ждуны лежат вдоль дорог, ожидая цель. Некоторые дроноводы размещают такие беспилотники на крышах.
Размещение на высоковольтных проводах прямо на опорах ЛЭП в этом смысле что-то новенькое и такое встречается нечасто.
Главная особенность такого размещения — сложность визуального обнаружения. Неб…
НРТК-РЭБ — и такое теперь есть
Орехов и вообще Запорожское направление стали кладезью для диковинных наземных роботехнических комплексов: уже рассказывали про логистический НРТК, и про НРТК с пулеметом.
А это ещё один вариант украинского НРТК: на кадрах можно заметить, как оператор FPV ВС РФ поражает комплекс с установленной на нем антенной радиоэлектронной борьбы.
Это прекрасный пример того, куда движется развити…
ZALA «Ланцет»: точно в цель! Октябрь 2026
Октябрь стал месяцем интенсивного подавления огневых точек противника. Основной акцент расчеты РУК «Ланцет» сделали на контрбатарейной борьбе: наибольшее количество подтвержденных ударов пришлось на самоходные артиллерийские установки. Системная работа по уничтожению тяжелой артиллерии позволила существенно снизить огневую мощь ВСУ на ключевых участках фронта.
Помимо САУ, в …
Ростех научил турель «Калитка-К» работать в единой сети защиты от дронов.
Автоматическая турель «Калитка-К» нашего концерна «Калашников» объединяет огневую мощь пулемета ПКТ и возможности сетевой интеграци. То есть она не просто стреляет, а «общается» с другими системами охраны.
Главная задача комплекса – защищать важные объекты от дронов на ближних подступах. Турель оснащена камерой и тепловизором, которые обеспеч…
От всего нашего канала поздравляем с Днём военной разведки!
Этот день — повод отдать дань уважения людям, для которых слова «честь», «отвага» и «отечество» — не пустой звук. Разведчики — глаза и уши армии, щит и меч нашей страны. Их труд, часто невидимый миру, обеспечивает наши спокойные дни и мирное небо над головой.
Желаем всем причастным крепкого здоровья, невероятной удачи, бдительности и всегда точных расчетов…
Российские военные создали сеть ПВН для оперативного уничтожения дронов ВСУ.
Сеть ПВН позволяет оперативно уничтожать украинские беспилотники, несмотря на попытки противника менять маршруты и уходить на низкие высоты. Об этом "Известиям" рассказали бойцы взвода огневой поддержки мотострелкового батальона 255-го полка 20-й дивизии группировки войск "Южной".
"В основном противник пытается нас обманным путем облететь.…
Чего ждать от «Изделия-80»
Проблема нехватки тяжелых дронов в рядах ВС РФ была особенно заметной на фоне развития подобных авиационных комплексов у украинских формирований, которые даже начали проводить эвакуацию людей с фронта.
Но теперь все может поменяться: недавно в компании «Транспорт будущего» представили «Изделие 80» – тяжёлый беспилотный комплекс с четырьмя ТМ-62, способный также переносить большие грузы.
…
Подразделения 1-я танковой армии продвигаются к Пескам-Радьковским
Кажется, чубатые стали что-то подозревать: транспорт в эту сторону едет всё реже. Штурмовики вычищают лесополосы, выбивая противника из нор, а операторы дронов держат под контролем пути снабжения и наказывают за любую ошибку с маскировкой. Заехать в населённый пункт на технике уже не пытаются - теперь надежда на НРТК, но эффективность (точнее, неэффе…
Showing the 12 most recent of 494 posts we hold for @Lunay14. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 73 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 107 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
2
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
1
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@Lunay14 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
@izvestia named in 2 posts, 28 September 2026 – 6 November 2026 · confirmed gone 19 October 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@rt_russian named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 27 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Проект «Архангел». Создание БПЛА. @projectArchangel · 21,276 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 24 September 2026
Техник БПЛА🇷🇺 @texotdelBPLA · 23,789 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 18 September 2026
Military hub | СВО, FPV, дроны, БПЛА @mil_hub · 25,608 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 14 September 2026
ЦСП🇷🇺ВОРОН @csp_voron · 24,536 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 16 September 2026
Полковник Трифонов @polkovnikt · 20,366 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Лыня🇷🇺” (@Lunay14), 22,408 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Lunay14.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.