Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for AlabaeV

Channel

AlabaeV

@AlabaeV_Al

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

998subscribers

+618 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002635634531
TypeChannel
Username@AlabaeV_Al
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/AlabaeV_Al

Growth

3809986896 August 2026 — 380 subscribers6 August 2026 — 380 subscribers14 August 2026 — 754 subscribers20 August 2026 — 890 subscribers26 August 2026 — 977 subscribers3 September 2026 — 998 subscribers6 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +618. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 287–1,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 17:58998+21
26 Aug 2026, 14:23977+87
20 Aug 2026, 01:51890+136
14 Aug 2026, 00:55754+374
6 Aug 2026, 20:18380no change
6 Aug 2026, 03:53380first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

271 reactions across 19 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9735.8%
custom 53709534766353688118230.3%
🔥3814.0%
custom 5341498088408234504145.17%
custom 5438216336687787737134.80%
custom 537087069114073781782.95%
😱82.95%
😁72.58%
custom 528742618102343902841.48%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 271 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 19 we hold a reading for · 32%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @AlabaeV_Al. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 June 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 16:55 UTC166 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

«ТАКТИЧЕСКИЕ ОГЛЯДКИ» Ребята, у меня стресс! Я смотрел это видео, и от стресса «ушёл в тоннельное зрение». Помогите!!! Куда крутить? Влево сначала или вправо?

custom 53709534766353688116

6 Aug 2026, 13:06 UTC≈3,350 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Его кто-то позвал? Голоса в голове? Вот бл@дь, откуда взяли эту херню — крутить башкой! Это он всех научил!!! Спасибо тебе, Тревис!

custom 537095347663536881116

5 Aug 2026, 11:22 UTC140 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @Veter7n39Video

"Хочешь жить - умей вертеться" Итак, что мы видим? - Полное, тотальное несоответствие поверхности упражнения и мат базы рекомендуемому навыку. - Полное и тотальное несоответствие экипирвки навыку. - Полное и тотальное непонимание инструкторами того, что и для чего, и почему, и зачем они делают. Так - вращение ради вращения. - Провальная, травмирующая техника исполнения. - Полное и тотальное непонимание курсантами тог

😁7custom 53414980884082345042

4 Aug 2026, 12:25 UTC≈1,320 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Товарищи моего подразделения подогнали нам магазин на девяносто пять патронов под калибр 5.45×39 производства Кореи. Я перед командировкой не успел его обкатать на полигоне, поэтому взял с собой уже в командировку с мыслями, что попробую с ним поработать в МОГах и посмотрю, как он себя поведёт. Поработать с этим магазином так и не получилось: после первого же выстрела он треснул в районе зацепа. Магазин в районе соро

😱8👍3

3 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC430 views18 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

МОГи неэффективны. НЕЭФФЕКТИВНЫ. Когда они это наконец поймут?! Мне хватило месяца работы в МОГе, чтобы это понять. МОГ может повредить сервопривод и отклонить траекторию полёта БПЛА — крайне редко БПЛА взрывается в воздухе. Пока Дяди в больших погонах не начнут говорить ПРАВДУ, так и будет продолжаться. Только перехватчики сейчас способны закрыть небо! Сбивать нужно перехватчиками на подлёте. Тем более — сейчас есть

custom 534149808840823450412👍6

3 Aug 2026, 07:44 UTC294 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @my_el_labVideo

«На земле, в небе и на море» Мы подготовили не традиционный ролик про железо и разработки. Это фильм - интервью про людей, которые создают технологии, способные защищать жизни других людей. В первой работе о лаборатории «Гагаринг» — производство, испытания БЭКов, обучение, отзывы от военных. Рассказываем о пути от идеи до работающего решения. С изменениями войны меняются и технологии. Скоро — полный фильм, пока

🔥6

2 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC287 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @instructorocherVideo

Увидел у коллег педагогический прием. Говорят после его выполнения на дистанцию в 100 метров человек начинает попадать в мишень, группа сжимается, а СТП и КТ начинают совпадать.

custom 537095347663536881119

2 Aug 2026, 06:00 UTC328 views12 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Video

Всех причастных с праздником! 🇷🇺🇷🇺 С Днём ВДВ!!!

👍12

1 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC331 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

Стрельба в движении. Очень часто наблюдаю, как сотрудники и военнослужащие стреляют в движении очень медленно, передвигаясь перекатом с пятки на носок. Почему они так делают? Потому что их так научили сдавать зачёты. Сотрудник двигается медленно, идеально обрабатывая каждый шаг, чтобы попасть в малый габарит — в «десятку» или в «альфу». Это спортивная история: так он зарабатывает очки на соревнованиях или сдаёт зачё

custom 543821633668778773713👍10

1 Aug 2026, 08:13 UTC296 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Что выберешь ты? 😁

custom 537095347663536881122

31 Jul 2026, 12:05 UTC382 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

БПЛА Hornet («Шершень») — дрон-камикадзе с ИИ. Американская компания Swift Beat LLC (связывают с экс-главой Google Эриком Шмидтом) с весны 2026 года поставляет на Украину барражирующий боеприпас Hornet. У нас его прозвали «Марсианин-2» — за систему наведения, похожую на ту, что использовалась на вертолёте NASA Ingenuity на Марсе (инерциально-оптическая одометрия, без привязки к спутникам). ТТХ: Длина — 1,4 м. Разм

👍6🔥2

31 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,410 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

HX-2 — европейский ударный дрон (Helsing). Конструкция: X-крыло + квадрокоптерные винты. Запуск: катапультный, пневматический (из коробов на бронемашинах, переносных ПУ, с БПЛА/авиации). Масса: 12 кг, электродвигатель, скорость до 220 км/ч, дальность до 100 км (вне прямой видимости). Цели: артиллерия, бронетехника, грузовики, бензовозы, внедорожники (Нива, пикапы) вдоль дорог. Боеголовка — противотанковая/противостру

👍7🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @AlabaeV_Al. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“AlabaeV” (@AlabaeV_Al), 998 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/AlabaeV_Al.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.