Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 15 days, net +36,224. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148,113–195,205 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 06:34
189,771
+2,933
20 Aug 2026, 08:42
186,838
+24
19 Aug 2026, 06:04
186,814
+2,989
18 Aug 2026, 08:16
183,825
-3
17 Aug 2026, 09:24
183,828
+2,986
15 Aug 2026, 14:28
180,842
+3,066
14 Aug 2026, 03:05
177,776
+6,063
12 Aug 2026, 20:44
171,713
+3,024
11 Aug 2026, 21:12
168,689
+3,028
11 Aug 2026, 00:13
165,661
+31
10 Aug 2026, 02:21
165,630
+3,032
9 Aug 2026, 04:11
162,598
+3,070
8 Aug 2026, 01:48
159,528
+2,905
6 Aug 2026, 22:50
156,623
+3,076
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
153,547
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:02
153,547
first reading
Engagement
75 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
21.4%
avg views ÷ 189,771 subscribers
Avg views / post
40,500
75 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.055%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
75
of 75 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 August 2026
Posts held
75 (30 July 2026 – 21 August 2026)
Views total
3,040,000
Reactions total
1,682
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈186
Videos
≈128
Links
≈1,540
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
32s
Average length
11s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,582 reactions across 69 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
518
32.7%
🤬
469
29.6%
👍
181
11.4%
😁
126
7.96%
😨
122
7.71%
👎
46
2.91%
🔥
44
2.78%
❤
35
2.21%
👏
28
1.77%
😢
10
0.632%
🙏
3
0.19%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 75 of the 75 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,682reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 75 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 21 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🐺 Волк в овечьей шкуре: пантюркист-заукраинец в российском вузе
♦️ В Казанском федеральном университете спокойно себе преподает некто Рамис Латипов (он же Латыпов) – бывший главред казанской редакции «Татар-информ» и сайта «Интертат», который дослужился, между прочим, до звания заслуженного работника печати Республики Татарстан.
♦️ Только вот из «Татар-информ» он уволился в феврале 2025-го, после скандального интер…
♦️ Даже несмотря на то, что при Эрдогана турецкая экономика переживает совсем не лучшие времена, торгово-экономических сотрудничество остаётся одним из тех крючков, на который османы пытаются подсадить своих партнёров по Организации тюркских государств. Турки продолжают в этом направлении плотно работать и с киргизами, и с другими странами Центральной Азии, плавно переводя вроде бы ни к чему не обязывающие коммерческ…
♦️ Эрдоган продолжает бороться за все хорошее против всего плохого. Теперь делает ставку на укрепление научного потенциала Турции. В первую очередь для нужд ВПК, разумеется. Вот только хватит ли в условиях высокой инфляции и демографического спада у него на это ресурсов?
🌐 Азербайджан и Турция как моральные камертоны деколониализма
♦️ В Баку сегодня проходит международная конференция «Несправедливости бельгийского колониализма», организованная Бакинской инициативной группой (БИГ).
♦️ БИГ была создана 6 июля 2023 г. в Баку участниками конференции «Полная ликвидация колониализма» (в рамках заседания бюро Движения неприсоединения, председателем которого тогда был Азербайджан). Инициат…
♦️ Судя по утечкам и поговоркам официальных лиц, Турция действительно имела далеко идущие планы на авиабазу Абу-аз-Зухур. Да и турецкая реакция на удар Израиля говорит о том же. Эрдоган, похоже, получил болезненный щелчок по носу.
🐺 Курултай в Венгрии: культурный фестиваль или пантюркистский смотр с оружием?
♦️ 14–16 августа в венгерском селе Бугач прошел девятый «Курултай гунно-тюркских народов». Организатором выступил Венгерский Туранский фонд, а главный партнер мероприятия — ТЮРКСОЙ. Гвоздь программы — личное участие генсека ОТГ Кубанычбека Омуралиева, который с трибуны поблагодарил венгерскую сторону за укрепление диалога между тюркским м…
♦️ В сообщении Türkiye Gazetesi о готовящейся в Стамбуле встрече глав МИД четырех стран важны два момента. Первый – позиционирование ее как формата «Мекка+1», что указывает на возможное расширение существующего альянса за счет Египта. Это превращает встречу из консультационной в потенциально институциональную.
Ну и второй важный момент – инициатива в ее организации исходит от Турции. Именно Анкара сегодня пытается вы…
🌊 Эгейское море раздора
♦️ Давние разногласия между Анкарой и Афинами по поводу континентального шельфа и морских границ в Эгейском море время от времени всплывают в медийном пространстве в виде громких заявлений чиновников. Раньше спорили из-за туризма и морских парков, теперь очередь дошла до «зеленой» энергетики.
♦️ Греция объявила о планах по развитию морской ветроэнергетики в Эгейском море (Афины намерены акти…
♦️ «Щедрый» Эрдоган решил сегодня попиариться на международном дне гуманитарной помощи. Если его послушать, Анкара – чуть ли не единственная в мире раздает эту помощь направо и налево. Без Турции никто бы не справился. Только дедуля забывает добавить, что турецкая «гуманитарка» на деле часто оказывается инструментом влияния, а вовсе не бескорыстной поддержкой нуждающихся. Не говорит он и о том, что в самой Турции инф…
🧤 Сирийские недра и длинные турецкие руки
♦️ Министр энергетики и природных ресурсов Турции Алпарслан Байрактар, приехавший в Дамаск с официальным визитом, провел встречу с сирийским коллегой аль-Баширом. По итогам они подписали Меморандум о сотрудничестве в сфере геологоразведки.
♦️ На самом деле это новость о стремительном возвращении Турции в сирийскую экономику и укреплении доминирующего политического влияния А…
♦️ Турция активно подключает свое лобби для положительного решения вопроса о возвращении в программу F-35. Вопрос лишь в том, насколько сильнее окажется израильское лобби, которое совсем не хочет усиления Турции в текущих обстоятельствах.
Генсек Организации тюркских государств (ОТГ) Кубанычбек Омуралиев в эксклюзивном интервью The Diplomatic Insight с нескрываемой гордостью заявляет: за последние годы ОТГ якобы совершила большой апгрейд — из культурного объединения превратилась в полноценный механизм экономической и стратегической интеграции.
Звучит внушительно. Вот только генсек, кажется, решил начать историю ОТГ с наиболее удобной для себя главы. З…
💯13🔥6🤬6😨3
Showing the 12 most recent of 75 posts we hold for @osman_devil. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@osman_devil edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
20 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 12,825 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 18 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Османский дьявол” (@osman_devil), 189,771 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/osman_devil.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.