International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 53% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
62 measurements spanning 92 days, net -472. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 26,097–26,744 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 62
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Nov 2026, 18:29
26,172
-20
4 Nov 2026, 17:46
26,192
-14
3 Nov 2026, 20:37
26,206
-28
2 Nov 2026, 22:17
26,234
-25
1 Nov 2026, 21:50
26,259
-26
1 Nov 2026, 00:06
26,285
-33
30 Oct 2026, 23:15
26,318
-28
29 Oct 2026, 21:19
26,346
-31
28 Oct 2026, 17:56
26,377
-10
27 Oct 2026, 20:41
26,387
-6
26 Oct 2026, 17:39
26,393
-11
25 Oct 2026, 18:19
26,404
+21
24 Oct 2026, 21:17
26,383
+19
23 Oct 2026, 20:09
26,364
-13
22 Oct 2026, 20:38
26,377
-5
21 Oct 2026, 19:51
26,382
-24
20 Oct 2026, 12:30
26,406
+10
19 Oct 2026, 12:30
26,396
-15
18 Oct 2026, 09:56
26,411
-12
17 Oct 2026, 11:37
26,423
first reading
Engagement
389 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.9%
avg views ÷ 26,172 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,390
207 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.27%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
207
of 389 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
389 (2 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
1,943,190
Reactions total
121,903
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 05:57 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,220
Videos
≈859
Links
≈3,950
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 00m
Average length
1m 41s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
209,084 reactions across 379 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
😁
70,387
33.7%
💯
44,779
21.4%
👍
33,955
16.2%
❤
23,918
11.4%
🔥
15,142
7.24%
😡
6,158
2.95%
🤯
5,809
2.78%
🙏
3,406
1.63%
😢
2,381
1.14%
👏
1,866
0.892%
👎
1,077
0.515%
🤝
206
0.099%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 389 of the 389 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213,800 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 389 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
34
across the posts below
Posts paid on
20
of 389 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
11
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @yb_ua. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 389 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 11 of 207 posts held from the last 30 days (5.31%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Фіналізуючи історію з викриттям чергового злочинного угруповання.
Як і з іншими корупційними кейсами, у самих схемах немає нічого нового. Можна згадати, як роками окремі представники поліції, СБУ та політичних кіл «кришували» наркотрафік на Луганщині в нульових і десятих (навіть після Революції Гідності), на Закарпатті та загалом на національному рівні. Можна згадати й нині покійного Киву, який займався подібним за …
❗️Буданов відреагував на нові аудіозаписи "Карфагену" і затримання силовиків
Закон один для всіх. Посади, звання та повноваження не можуть бути підставою для уникнення відповідальності. Корупція та будь-які злочини мають отримувати належну правову оцінку, а винні — нести відповідальність
— наголосив керівник ОП.
Буданов зазначив, що ситуація потребує "вчасних сильних дій".
Очікуємо об'єктивного, незалежного розслі…
💬 За тиждень до проміжних виборів у США понад два десятки провідних стратегів Трампа провели «похоронний» дзвінок, де говорили про втечу до Ізраїлю — NYT.
За даними видання, розмова між радниками Трампа почалася з розмови про ціанід. Головний соціолог президента США Тоні Фабріціо запитав у присутніх, чи хочуть вони спочатку «білу пігулку чи чорну».
Загалом приблизно 30 хвилин розмова тривала в дусі чорного гумору: …
Події на Петропавлівській Борщагівці (коли російським провокаторам дали атакувати військових), не посаджений з часів ковіду (а може ще раніше) Остап Стахів та інші саботажники, натовпи шкідників, які дискредитують і нищать державні механізми, досі не нейтралізовані фінансові і організаційні центри РПЦ ФСБ і вчорашні викриття НАБУ - про одне і теж.
Надто багато людей в спецслужбах займається не тим. Замість знешкоджу…
Чи зловтішалися ми весь ефір?
Ні, в першу чергу було багато якісного контенту від пана Корнієнка.
І так, ми зловтішалися весь ефір.
https://www.youtube.com/live/kL2t20y9P9U?si=Xd1tNsKOC9BqULd4
дочекалися синю хвилю на мапі Америки, дочекаємося і синю хвилю на мапі України
❤564😁90👍46🙏29🤯6👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 389 posts we hold for @yb_ua. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@yb_ua edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
16 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Після останніх подій і тенденцій. Якби завтра вибори президента - ваш голос…
Зеленському29%
Залужному9%
Порошенку9%
Буданову11%
Федорову7%
Коню з двома хуями32%
Іншому кандидату14%
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 389 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Олександр Нотевський @notevskyi · 25,847 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Шрайк @RomanShrike · 42,212 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Алексей Копытько @kopytkoav · 26,677 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Не Олексій @notnets · 28,230 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
CYNIC @cynic2020 · 19,775 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Орестократія @orestokratiia · 22,649 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,456 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 43,205 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
Монова @monovaolena · 33,683 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,713 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Чорний гумор. Українською. #ЧГУ @blackhumourinua · 20,010 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 3 October 2026
Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів @mortisaeterna · 19,333 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
ГОЛОБУЦЬКИЙ @allgolobutsky · 23,440 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 22 September 2026
Погляд Приходька @NazarPrykhodkoPlus · 21,882 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 21 September 2026
MYROSHNYKOV @myro_shnykov · 30,240 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 6 September 2026
Портников @portnikov · 68,897 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 20 August 2026
Шрайк Ньюс @ShrikeNews · 97,566 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Істребін.UA @istrebin · 21,243 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
політ технолога ✙ ▵ @yaroslavivval · 25,891 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 14 September 2026
Несемось! @Katimsya · 30,179 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Maxliner @maxlineua · 19,165 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 5 October 2026
Євген Магда/Переможний Магдіяж @rozumaha · 24,426 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира @D7_channel · 35,114 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Правила Дорожнього Руху України @PDRUA · 27,344 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 31 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юрій Богданов” (@yb_ua), 26,172 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/yb_ua.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.