Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 71% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
44,000 average views per post against 42,217 subscribers — an engagement rate of 104.1%. Across the 8,324 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,631–99,992 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 5.06% and 20.7%, with a median of 10.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (18 September 2026 – 18 October 2026)
Posts measured
15 of 16 published in the window (0 exact, 15 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
659,400
Mature posts only
104.1% over 15 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 October 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
41 measurements spanning 73 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,129–42,381 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 41
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 20:41
42,217
+15
16 Oct 2026, 23:58
42,202
+16
16 Oct 2026, 02:06
42,186
-4
15 Oct 2026, 03:41
42,190
-3
13 Oct 2026, 22:18
42,193
+14
10 Oct 2026, 15:55
42,179
-18
6 Oct 2026, 13:55
42,197
+10
1 Oct 2026, 17:02
42,187
-68
18 Sept 2026, 09:39
42,255
+9
16 Sept 2026, 00:59
42,246
-7
14 Sept 2026, 05:19
42,253
-12
12 Sept 2026, 16:20
42,265
-21
10 Sept 2026, 14:21
42,286
-8
7 Sept 2026, 13:17
42,294
-26
4 Sept 2026, 16:36
42,320
-20
3 Sept 2026, 02:08
42,340
-3
1 Sept 2026, 20:34
42,343
-7
31 Aug 2026, 19:26
42,350
-2
30 Aug 2026, 21:27
42,352
+120
29 Aug 2026, 20:15
42,232
first reading
Engagement
65 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
104.1%
avg views ÷ 42,217 subscribers
Avg views / post
44,000
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.03%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
16
of 65 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 October 2026
Posts held
65 (4 July 2026 – 14 October 2026)
Views total
659,400
Reactions total
33,170
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
18 Oct 2026, 06:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈514
Videos
≈88
Links
≈1,340
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
154,814 reactions across 61 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
59,823
38.6%
👍
24,335
15.7%
😁
23,731
15.3%
❤
10,151
6.56%
🔥
5,926
3.83%
🤣
4,461
2.88%
👎
4,361
2.82%
🤔
3,632
2.35%
😢
3,344
2.16%
🙏
2,758
1.78%
🤷♂
2,470
1.60%
🙈
2,186
1.41%
🌚
1,902
1.23%
🤬
1,896
1.22%
🤡
1,460
0.943%
🦄
966
0.624%
👏
347
0.224%
👌
282
0.182%
🫡
199
0.129%
🤮
151
0.098%
5 further kinds
433
0.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 62 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155,386 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 14 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Отменить предупреждения о запуске баллистики ✅
Ограничить Старлинк для мидлстрайков ✅
Вместо принуждения агрессора к миру Трамп включил программу принуждения жертвы агрессии к капитуляции.
Но как нихера не понимал психологию людей, интересы которых выходят за рамки зарабатывания бабла, так и не понимает.
А значит, ожидаемой для себя реакции не получит.
Из предыдущего опыта можно предположить, что очередная волна…
За окном привычно воет сирена, и одновременно с этим приходит сообщение от мобильного оператора:
"Замініть звичайні гудки на музику, яка радує, дивує або надихає".
Хорошая идея, Киевстар, хорошая идея.
"Энергетическое перемирие" от Трампа мне, конечно, взорвало мозг.
Взаимный отказ от ударов по НПЗ - это ж додуматься нужно!
У России десятки НПЗ, это, блин, страна-бензоколонка. А у Украины работающих НПЗ примерно ноль.
Охеренная "взаимность".
Какое еще будут идеи?
Взаимный отказ от ударов по дата-центрам "Яндекса"?
Взаимный отказ от ударов по стратегическим бомбардировщикам?
Взаимный отказ от ударов по кремлям …
"Дизельная сделка" Трампа-Путина
▪️Что получает Трамп
Возможность пиздануть в уши электорату, что он всех спас. Хотя обещанных до выборов в Конгресс 300 тыщ тонн дизеля хватит аж на 15 часов потребления в США.
Кроме того, он рассчитывает повлиять на котировки дизеля. Ну и святое дело - подлизнуть другу Владимиру.
▪️Что получает Путин
Вовсе не возможность экспорта дизеля - она была ограничена не столько санкциями…
🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов:
Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci
Карта - 5375411217472054
PayPal - [email protected]
👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы:
@ShrikeNews - новости, которые мне кажутся интересными
@TruthMinistry - всякая забавная фигня
Еще раз всем спасибо.
Давайте на минутку вспомню, что я вообще-то комментатор внутриполитических событий, а не вот это вот все.
Про Гончаренко.
Эпиграф.
Симбиоз - это совместная жизнь и тесное взаимодействие живых организмов, которые принадлежат к разным биологическим видам.
Когда типичного регионала Гончаренко в 2014 году включили в список тогда еще БПП, я спросил у его будущих коллег по фракции:
- Что вы, блин, творите?
На что пол…
Результаты 85-го опроса "Сколько еще продлится война?"
В октябре настроения практически полностью повторили апрельские, но тогда произошел перелом.
После апреля мы радовались разъебу НПЗ, участившимся ударам миддлстрайками и слухам о продвижениях на фронте. Ожидаемая продолжительность войны сокращалась.
Но потом произошло увольнение Федорова, что сильно просадило настроения в августе. А в сентябре-октябре многие и…
Сбылась мечта зетников - Россия начала методично бить по мостам через Днепр в Киеве.
Четыре года они вопрошали, почему нет таких ударов, и теперь счастливы. Постят фоточки километровых заторов на левом берегу, возникших утром из-за закрытия трех мостов, и радуются.
Но у нас тоже есть своя скромная мечта - удары по Крымскому мосту.
Разъеб лоханок в Азовском море и успешные атаки на Керченский порт, который располож…
Шрайк pinned «🤝 Огромное спасибо всем, кто поддерживает мою Телеграм-деятельность с помощью донатов: Банка - https://send.monobank.ua/jar/3ehE1mKCci Карта - 5375411217472054 PayPal - [email protected] 👉 Напомню, что я веду и другие каналы: @ShrikeNews - новости,…»
Сентябрь 2026. Наверное, самый хреновый месяц по прилетам. К летним обстрелам-расстрелам баллистикой добавились российские реактивы, средства для борьбы с которыми еще не готовы.
Но войны не выигрываются ударами по академиям и запугиванием мирняка.
Ставка Путина на террор не сработает.
Сентябрь 2026. Самый кровавый месяц для российской армии. Формально, по циферкам Гентшаба, декабрь 2024 останется рекордным, но се…
💯2,780👍421🙏131❤51😢43🤡42🌚16🤝14
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @RomanShrike. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@RomanShrike edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 October 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 4 July 2026 to 14 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Шрайк Ньюс @ShrikeNews · 97,690 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026
Алексей Копытько @kopytkoav · 26,746 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Юрій Богданов @yb_ua · 26,411 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Монова @monovaolena · 34,058 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 3 September 2026
Не Олексій @notnets · 27,393 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 10 September 2026
Zvиздец Мангусту @zvizdecmanhustu · 68,095 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
Сито Сократа @sytosokrata · 162,972 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Roman Donik @romandonik · 21,511 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 22 September 2026
Істребін.UA @istrebin · 21,044 Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 4 October 2026
Ю.Г. | Юрій Гудименко @gudymenko_official · 38,013 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
Податковий консультант - все про податки 🇺🇦 @notaxpro · 18,946 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 4 October 2026
Олександр Нотевський @notevskyi · 25,947 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Бізнес-Patriot @BiznesPatriot · 20,738 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 24 September 2026
Mortis Æterna / Департамент пасивних заходів @mortisaeterna · 19,409 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 30 September 2026
Sonya Koshkina (official) @sonyakoshkina · 26,265 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 15 September 2026
Несемось! @Katimsya · 29,737 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 September 2026
Armchair General UA ✙ @armchairgeneralUA · 42,275 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 30 August 2026
CYNIC @cynic2020 · 19,941 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 September 2026
Будем всех бамбить! @budem_bambit · 21,069 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 21 September 2026
✙Resurgam✙ @resurgammmm · 55,646 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 23 August 2026
Орестократія @orestokratiia · 22,853 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 September 2026
AMELIN (Economics, Defense Innovation and Futures) @AnatoliyAmelin · 19,228 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 2 October 2026
D7 NEWS | Демократична Сокира @D7_channel · 34,987 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 2 September 2026
Податки фіз осіб та ФОП @UAtaxesYou · 23,323 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 18 September 2026
This channel appears in 32 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Шрайк” (@RomanShrike), 42,217 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RomanShrike.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.