Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Валентин - чисто міленіальський контент

Channel

Валентин - чисто міленіальський контент

@UABURZHUA2

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,177subscribers

+479 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003384181679
TypeChannel
Username@UABURZHUA2
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/UABURZHUA2

Topic

Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,6989,1778,937.56 August 2026 — 8,698 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,698 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,699 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,735 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,724 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,762 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,770 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,888 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,921 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,908 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,961 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,989 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,025 subscribers11 September 2026 — 9,134 subscribers15 September 2026 — 9,177 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 40 days, net +479. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,626–9,249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 07:569,177+43
11 Sept 2026, 11:399,134+109
7 Sept 2026, 00:389,025+36
2 Sept 2026, 19:068,989+28
30 Aug 2026, 07:378,961+53
26 Aug 2026, 22:338,908-13
24 Aug 2026, 09:148,921+33
20 Aug 2026, 09:378,888+118
17 Aug 2026, 18:468,770+8
14 Aug 2026, 21:358,762+38
11 Aug 2026, 20:448,724-11
9 Aug 2026, 02:218,735+36
6 Aug 2026, 04:108,699+1
6 Aug 2026, 03:018,698no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:528,698first reading

Engagement

320 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
33.8%
avg views ÷ 9,177 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,100
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.35%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 320 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held320 (5 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total173,760
Reactions total4,081
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 13s
Average length
1m 14s

Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

31,205 reactions across 297 posts, in 53 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁7,48524.0%
💯6,45420.7%
👍5,50217.6%
❤4,54314.6%
🤣1,5314.91%
🤬9032.89%
🤡8102.60%
🤝6682.14%
🔥6462.07%
😢5741.84%
🤔4021.29%
👀2930.939%
🫡1650.529%
🤯1320.423%
🤷‍♂1260.404%
🤨1230.394%
✍900.288%
🙈840.269%
🥴810.26%
🤮620.199%
33 further kinds5311.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 318 of the 320 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35,301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC808 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤17👍2

28 Aug 2026, 15:26 UTC820 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤17💯4👍2

28 Aug 2026, 15:25 UTC821 views27 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤬20👍7

28 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC≈2,400 views163 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Здогадатись було не важко

🤬87❤56💯14😁3🤯2👍1

28 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈2,440 views44 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

👍44

28 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈2,550 views156 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Треш який. Нічого робити? Чи це вже система підставляє всіх навколо. Олександра знаю особисто. Це сильна принципова людина

👍96💯45🤬12😁2❤1

28 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC≈1,560 views207 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @ukraine_contextVideo

Прямо зараз у Харкові відомому військовому, екскомбату 47-ї бригади «Маґура» Олександру Ширшину, який раніше публічно критикував попереднє військове командування, під час огляду автомобіля підкинули «траву». Наразі триває перевірка обставин.

🤬192🤯14❤1

28 Aug 2026, 07:00 UTC≈2,650 views42 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Власне як для гоимдіяча мене цікавить дослідження умов які стимулюють цей розвиток. Для подальшої і громадської діяльності з вдосконалення таких.

👍41❤1

28 Aug 2026, 06:54 UTC≈2,680 views41 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Але напрямок зрозумілий. Багатоскладність - як основа розвиненого суспільства. Шлях і досвід України для світу. Мова про багатогнранність самоорганізованих груп громадян і іх якість: фонди, ГО, підприємства, потенційні корпорації, партії, тощо. По суті мова про організовану соціальну тканину. Яка її якість, тенденція, кількість, наскліьки благодатний правовий і культурний контекст і умови в яких вони розиваються. В…

👍37🤝4

28 Aug 2026, 06:52 UTC≈2,640 views94 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

З новою діяльністю викладача в університеті - прийдеться отримувати науковий ступінь. І звісно на PhD ми не зупинемось. Благо, все публічно. Будете читати, шукать там шось в науковій. Я, звісно, все буду писати органічно і актуально. Мислити інноваційно - це мені важко не було. Коли почну шлях, оголошу і буду тут викладать тези своїх статей. Будете зі мною сперичатись. Ви тут всі умні.

❤65👍18🤣9💯2

28 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC≈2,550 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026

І погоджуюся з дописувачами. Ясно що влада і взагалі конструкт недосконалий. І там завжди було б що знайти. Але якби вона рухалась не падішахські, а горизонтально, про що я не раз говорив, у НАБУ і САП не було ніякої легітимності грати на плівках.

❤44👍16🥱1

28 Aug 2026, 06:25 UTC≈2,630 views123 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Це правда. Тільки питання. Де тут більше НАБУ і САП а де те, що суспільство просто сумує за електоральним процесом. Ні легітимності, ні можливості зупинити цей процес - немає. Тож буде влада бита ногами антикор інститутів.

❤118🥱3💯1😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 320 posts we hold for @UABURZHUA2. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

18 Aug 2026, 21:02 UTCAnonymous Poll2,140 voters approx.

Що небезпечне для Конституції?

  1. Вибори у військовий час29%
  2. Формування фактично президентської форми правління і добивання залишків інституційної незалежності81%

The shares total 110%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

18 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTCAnonymous Poll2,020 voters approx.

Вибори треба?

  1. Так61%
  2. Ні44%

The shares total 105%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 320 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Валентин - чисто міленіальський контент” (@UABURZHUA2), 9,177 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/UABURZHUA2.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.