National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 94 days, net +10,824. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,969–52,249 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 13:54
50,601
+366
6 Nov 2026, 17:26
50,235
+872
5 Nov 2026, 14:17
49,363
+1,187
4 Nov 2026, 15:36
48,176
+1,241
3 Nov 2026, 17:29
46,935
-25
2 Nov 2026, 19:29
46,960
-24
1 Nov 2026, 16:21
46,984
-12
31 Oct 2026, 19:50
46,996
-21
30 Oct 2026, 20:10
47,017
-25
29 Oct 2026, 19:10
47,042
-26
28 Oct 2026, 21:37
47,068
-14
27 Oct 2026, 18:36
47,082
-5
26 Oct 2026, 18:49
47,087
-22
25 Oct 2026, 16:40
47,109
-7
24 Oct 2026, 18:25
47,116
-14
23 Oct 2026, 19:27
47,130
+10
22 Oct 2026, 18:31
47,120
+38
21 Oct 2026, 15:38
47,082
+73
20 Oct 2026, 11:45
47,009
-21
19 Oct 2026, 08:31
47,030
first reading
Engagement
130 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 188 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
94.2%
avg views ÷ 50,601 subscribers
Avg views / post
47,700
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.78%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 130 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
130 (22 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
1,812,200
Reactions total
32,219
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,450
Videos
≈81
Links
≈2,920
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
70,870 reactions across 127 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
23,340
32.9%
🔥
22,977
32.4%
👍
18,166
25.6%
🤬
4,946
6.98%
😱
1,233
1.74%
🥰
208
0.293%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 130 of the 130 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 71,776 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 130 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 38 posts held from the last 30 days (15.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
#ВАКС застосував запобіжний захід експершому заступнику начальника Департаменту захисту національної державності СБУ
Сьогодні, 6 листопада, слідчий суддя ВАКС застосував запобіжний захід колишньому першому заступнику начальника Департаменту захисту національної державності Служби безпеки України у вигляді тримання під вартою із альтернативою внесення застави у сумі 65 млн грн.
У разі внесення застави на підозрювано…
Операція «Карфаген»: ВАКС взяв під варту заступника начальника відділу Управління карного розшуку ГУНП на Київщині
06 листопада 2026 року слідчий суддя ВАКС підтримав позицію прокурора САП та застосував запобіжний захід у вигляді тримання під вартою без права внесення застави до ще одного підозрюваного у справі – заступника начальника відділу Управління карного розшуку ГУНП на Київщині.
Строк тримання під вартою…
САП, НАБУ та БФ Спільнота Стерненка підписали Меморандум про співпрацю.
Ми вже працюємо разом, щоб кошти з антикорупційних справ допомагали забезпечувати Сили Оборони необхідною зброєю та майном. Меморандум закріплює та деталізує нашу співпрацю.
Водночас у рамках Меморандуму продовжуватимемо регулярний обмін інформацією щодо ціноутворення та закупівель в оборонній сфері.
Крім того, Меморандум закріплює механізм зв…
Операція «Карфаген»: ВАКС взяв під варту одного з учасників злочинної організації
05 листопада 2026 року слідчий суддя ВАКС застосував запобіжний захід у вигляді тримання під вартою без права внесення застави до ще одного підозрюваного у справі – підлеглого організатора злочинної організації.
Строк дії запобіжного заходу – до 02.01.2027.
📌Відповідно до ч. 1 ст. 62 Конституції України особа вважається невинуватою…
Операція «Карфаген»: ВАКС обрав запобіжний захід керівнику одного з Департаментів Нацполіції України
05 листопада 2026 року слідчий суддя ВАКС частково задовольнив клопотання детективів НАБУ, погоджене прокурором САП, та застосував запобіжний захід до керівника одного з Департаментів Нацполіції України – одного з учасників злочинної організації, викритої в межах операції «Карфаген».
Суд застосував до нього запобі…
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ Операція «Карфаген»: викрито нову злочинну організацію👥
НАБУ і САП викрили злочинну організацію, учасники якої налагодили систематичне надання неправомірної вигоди високопосадовцям правоохоронних органів за безперешкодну діяльність шахрайських колцентрів та інших незаконних бізнесів.
Організатором був раніше неодноразово засуджений чоловік, який залучив до злочинної діяльності чинних високопосадовців СБУ, …
Високопосадовець СБУ погрожує застосуванням зброї та перешкоджає проведенню обшуку.
Під час проведення детективами НАБУ законних слідчих дій на підставі ухвали слідчого судді ВАКС один із високопосадовців СБУ погрожує застосуванням вогнепальної зброї та не допускає детективів до місця проведення обшуку.
Крім того, на місце проведення обшуку прибули спецпризначенці СБУ.
Такі дії є неприпустимими та перешкоджають ви…
Showing the 12 most recent of 130 posts we hold for @nab_ukraine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nab_ukraine edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
5 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 71 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 111 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
БЕБ | Бюро економічної безпеки України @esbu_gov_ua · 13,806#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НАЗК @NAZK_gov_ua · 24,451 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Центр протидії корупції_ @fuckcorruption · 26,787 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Судово-юридична газета @sudua · 55,411 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
ВИЙ.Ukraine @viyukraine · 21,935 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
🇺🇦 Customs of Ukraine (and not only) @Customs_of_Ukraine · 21,970 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
АНТИКОР @antikor · 456,414 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Данило Гетманцев @getmantsevdanil · 51,308 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
CyberpoliceUA | Кіберполіція України @CyberpolUA · 20,075 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 29 September 2026
Середич.info @seredych · 33,198 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Дон Кихот @DonUkraine · 22,878 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Офіс Генерального прокурора @pgo_gov_ua · 25,976 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
6 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Князев, Всеволод Сергеевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…размере 2,7 миллиона [[Доллар США|долларов США]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/1824|title=НАБУ|website=Telegram|access-date=2023-05-15|arch…” read 1 November 2026
Балога Андрій Вікторович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…земельної ділянки комунальної власності площею понад 3 га[https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2617 Продаж за безцінь 3 га землі на Закарпатті: викрито міського…” read 1 November 2026
Головко Михайло Йосифович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…вони вимагали 2,4 млн грн хабаря{{Cite web|title=НАБУ|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/1945|website=Telegram|accessdate=2023-06-29|archive-date=202…” read 1 November 2026
Гізо Углава(uk.wikipedia.org) “…[[Національне антикорупційне бюро України|НАБУ]].{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2740|title=НАБУ|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-09-03}}{{Cite…” read 1 November 2026
Коломойський Ігор Валерійович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…«[[Укренерго]]» Дмитра Кондрашова{{Cite web|title=НАБУ|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2307|website=Telegram|accessdate=2024-01-25|archive-date=202…” read 1 November 2026
Столар Вадим Михайлович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…рішень, документів про право власності та інше{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/4189 |title=НАБУ |website=Telegram |access-date=2026-09-11}}…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАБУ” (@nab_ukraine), 50,601 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nab_ukraine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.