National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 61% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
83,400 average views per post against 47,145 subscribers — an engagement rate of 177.0%. Across the 606 registered channels in the same cohort — 31,651–99,866 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 10.2% and 25.6%, with a median of 16.5%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured
33 of 33 published in the window (0 exact, 33 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
2,753,700
Mature posts only
184.9% over 31 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
35 measurements spanning 44 days, net +7,368. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,485–48,296 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 19:59
47,145
-19
16 Sept 2026, 12:17
47,164
+497
14 Sept 2026, 14:18
46,667
+376
13 Sept 2026, 00:37
46,291
-6
11 Sept 2026, 00:36
46,297
+201
8 Sept 2026, 01:37
46,096
+2,204
5 Sept 2026, 01:57
43,892
+1,826
3 Sept 2026, 09:03
42,066
-10
2 Sept 2026, 01:06
42,076
-7
1 Sept 2026, 04:14
42,083
-13
31 Aug 2026, 06:13
42,096
-15
30 Aug 2026, 08:53
42,111
-8
29 Aug 2026, 06:11
42,119
+32
28 Aug 2026, 09:22
42,087
+15
27 Aug 2026, 12:12
42,072
+21
26 Aug 2026, 12:29
42,051
+33
25 Aug 2026, 14:47
42,018
+28
24 Aug 2026, 16:48
41,990
+66
23 Aug 2026, 00:13
41,924
+108
21 Aug 2026, 12:18
41,816
first reading
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 98 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
178.5%
avg views ÷ 47,145 subscribers
Avg views / post
84,200
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.723%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held
77 (22 July 2026 – 23 September 2026)
Views total
2,777,500
Reactions total
20,083
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
24 Sept 2026, 04:43 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈79
Links
≈2,880
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 24 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
58s
Average length
58s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
33,267 reactions across 74 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
11,458
34.4%
❤
10,813
32.5%
👍
8,442
25.4%
🤬
1,861
5.59%
😱
562
1.69%
🥰
131
0.394%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 77 of the 77 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 34,173 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 77 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👤👤👤👤 Легалізація майна на 26 млн грн: підозра ексголові Касаційного господарського суду👥
НАБУ та САП повідомили про підозру колишньому голові Касаційного господарського суду у складі Верховного Суду в легалізації (відмиванні) майна, одержаного злочинним шляхом, в особливо великому розмірі. Крім того, про підозру у вчиненні злочину повідомлено ще двом особам — колишній підлеглій судді та її матері.
У період 2021–202…
У відповідь на запити медіа інформуємо щодо обставин реєстрації кримінального провадження стосовно депутата Київської міської ради, екстренера футбольного клубу «Динамо».
13 серпня 2026 року до Національного бюро надійшла ухвала слідчого судді Вищого антикорупційного суду, якою він зобов’язав уповноважених осіб Бюро внести до Єдиного реєстру досудових розслідувань відомості за повідомленням від 21.07.2026 щодо можли…
⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️ Мільйонні розкрадання на трансформаторах: скеровано до суду⚖️
Перед судом постануть 8 учасників організованої групи, яких НАБУ і САП обвинувачують у масштабних розкраданнях в АТ «Харківобленерго».
У 2021 році організатор схеми взяв під особистий контроль проведення закупівель енергетичного обладнання в АТ «Харківобленерго». Також він вживав заходів, аби поширити свій вплив на тендери інших державних підпри…
👤👤👤👤 137,5 млн грн на вагонах: підозра експосадовцю київського метро👥
НАБУ і САП викрили злочинну групу, яка заволоділа понад 100 млн грн комунального підприємства «Київський метрополітен».
За даними слідства, наприкінці 2022 року Варшавський метрополітен зголосився безоплатно передати КП «Київський метрополітен» 60 вагонів метро.
Для організації їх доставки до Києва комунальне підприємство у 2023 році провело низ…
👤👤👤👤 Заволодіння 100 тис. тонн нафтопродуктів: викрито організовану групу👥
НАБУ та САП викрили масштабну схему заволодіння нафтопродуктами ПАТ «Укрнафта» та легалізації коштів від їх реалізації.
За першим епізодом злочинної діяльності (2017-2020 рр.) про підозру повідомили чотирьом учасникам оборудки:
👤організатору (вищого рівня) – одному з лідерів відомої бізнес-групи, яка фактично контролювала нафтову сферу еконо…
❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️❗️ До уваги медіа❗️
Сьогодні о 17:00 відбудеться брифінг за участі Директора НАБУ Семена Кривоноса та Керівника САП Олександра Клименка.
Акредитація
Щодо заяви Генерального прокурора повідомляємо, що НАБУ і САП розцінюють ці дії як продовження системної атаки на незалежні антикорупційні органи.
Ця атака розпочалася не сьогодні. Її активна фаза стартувала ще минулого літа, коли однією з головних цілей була спроба підпорядкувати НАБУ і САП Офісу Генерального прокурора.
НАБУ і САП не беруть участі в політичній боротьбі. Ми діємо виключно в межах закону та готові з…
⚖️9 років позбавлення волі: ВАКС оголосив вирок нардепу, якого викрили на хабарництві
11 вересня 2026 року колегія суддів ВАКС оголосила вирок народному депутату України IX скликання.
Його визнано винуватим у вчиненні злочинів, передбаченого ч. 4 ст. 368 КК України. Проте в іншій частині обвинувачення суд перекваліфікував дії народного депутата з ч. 4 ст. 27, ч. 4 ст. 369 КК України на ч. 2 ст. 369-2 КК України т…
❤271🔥139👍87🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @nab_ukraine. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@nab_ukraine edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 September 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 51 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 75 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
БЕБ | Бюро економічної безпеки України @esbu_gov_ua · 13,558#1
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 29 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
НАЗК @NAZK_gov_ua · 24,732 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026
Центр протидії корупції_ @fuckcorruption · 25,896 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Судово-юридична газета @sudua · 54,503 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
ВИЙ.Ukraine @viyukraine · 21,860 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
🇺🇦 Customs of Ukraine (and not only) @Customs_of_Ukraine · 21,977 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
АНТИКОР @antikor · 436,436 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
Данило Гетманцев @getmantsevdanil · 65,987 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
Середич.info @seredych · 31,948 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
Дон Кихот @DonUkraine · 22,976 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 18 September 2026
Офіс Генерального прокурора @pgo_gov_ua · 25,998 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
6 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Князев, Всеволод Сергеевич(ru.wikipedia.org) “…размере 2,7 миллиона [[Доллар США|долларов США]]{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/1824|title=НАБУ|website=Telegram|access-date=2023-05-15|arch…” read 13 September 2026
Балога Андрій Вікторович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…земельної ділянки комунальної власності площею понад 3 га[https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2617 Продаж за безцінь 3 га землі на Закарпатті: викрито міського…” read 13 September 2026
Головко Михайло Йосифович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…вони вимагали 2,4 млн грн хабаря{{Cite web|title=НАБУ|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/1945|website=Telegram|accessdate=2023-06-29|archive-date=202…” read 13 September 2026
Гізо Углава(uk.wikipedia.org) “…[[Національне антикорупційне бюро України|НАБУ]].{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2740|title=НАБУ|website=Telegram|access-date=2024-09-03}}{{Cite…” read 13 September 2026
Коломойський Ігор Валерійович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…«[[Укренерго]]» Дмитра Кондрашова{{Cite web|title=НАБУ|url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/2307|website=Telegram|accessdate=2024-01-25|archive-date=202…” read 13 September 2026
Столар Вадим Михайлович(uk.wikipedia.org) “…рішень, документів про право власності та інше{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/nab_ukraine/4189 |title=НАБУ |website=Telegram |access-date=2026-09-11}}…” read 13 September 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“НАБУ” (@nab_ukraine), 47,145 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/nab_ukraine.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.