Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Марія Барабаш | СПРОТИВ

Channel

Марія Барабаш | СПРОТИВ

@mariabarabash

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

8,687subscribers

-436 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001239501442
TypeChannel
Username@mariabarabash
DescriptionОфіційний канал Марії Барабаш Написати автору: @mariabarabashua Приєднатися до СПРОТИВ: http://sprotyv.team Підтримати автора каналу: PayPal: [email protected] Приватбанк: 5221 1912 0039 6611
Created18 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/mariabarabash

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6879,1278,9076 August 2026 — 9,123 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,122 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,127 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,126 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,119 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,094 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,049 subscribers27 August 2026 — 9,025 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,017 subscribers2 September 2026 — 9,011 subscribers7 September 2026 — 9,003 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,984 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,978 subscribers19 September 2026 — 8,944 subscribers29 September 2026 — 8,862 subscribers6 October 2026 — 8,811 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,774 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,759 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,746 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,726 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,734 subscribers28 October 2026 — 8,724 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,710 subscribers4 November 2026 — 8,687 subscribers6 August 20264 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -436. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,621–9,193 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 01:488,687-23
31 Oct 2026, 18:088,710-14
28 Oct 2026, 20:398,724-10
25 Oct 2026, 21:268,734+8
22 Oct 2026, 18:288,726-20
19 Oct 2026, 07:058,746-13
16 Oct 2026, 00:198,759-15
13 Oct 2026, 09:498,774-37
6 Oct 2026, 20:428,811-51
29 Sept 2026, 12:218,862-82
19 Sept 2026, 10:008,944-34
14 Sept 2026, 18:208,978-6
11 Sept 2026, 15:028,984-19
7 Sept 2026, 03:409,003-8
2 Sept 2026, 20:469,011-6
30 Aug 2026, 12:399,017-8
27 Aug 2026, 14:579,025-24
24 Aug 2026, 23:549,049-39
21 Aug 2026, 14:359,088-6
18 Aug 2026, 08:369,094first reading

Engagement

114 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
24.3%
avg views ÷ 8,687 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,110
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.92%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 114 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held114 (4 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total56,897
Reactions total1,661
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 10:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,660
Videos
≈597
Links
≈1,830

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 22s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

8,388 reactions across 113 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,63919.5%
❤1,57518.8%
👍1,48817.7%
😢89110.6%
🔥86410.3%
💯85210.2%
🙏5226.22%
🤯2523.00%
😁1471.75%
👎961.14%
👀540.644%
🫡80.095%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 113 of the 114 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 8,388 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
14
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 113 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @mariabarabash. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 114 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (22.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Агонія режиму, який намагається відволікти увагу від Карфагену.

🔥3😁1

5 Nov 2026, 10:10 UTC141 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Forwarded from @udalenka_ukrPhoto

Учора канали-мільйонники влаштували вечір геополітичної паніки, синхронно розігнавши страшилку про те, що Іран нібито збирається бомбити Київ, Львів та Одесу в разі атаки з боку США. Як доказ пабліки INSIDER UA, Times of Ukraine, Україна Сейчас, Всевидящее ОКО та Телеграмна служба новин - Україна дали скриншот з ефіру іранського держканалу IRINN із картою Європи в ядерних грибах та ракетах. Виявилося, що це фейк: ефі…

😁5

5 Nov 2026, 09:48 UTC353 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Подивіться це відео 2023 року про Хімпром члена СПРОТИВ Івана Спринського зі Станіславом Домбровським. https://youtu.be/DQDzltxrP54?si=9FtWiCfyJ4b-GBXo

👍2

4 Nov 2026, 22:42 UTC≈1,560 views75 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

І хто такий Арах… з плівок НАБУ?🤔

👍69💯4❤2

4 Nov 2026, 22:13 UTC≈3,850 views139 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Що зараз відбувається в рамках операції «Карфаген» від моїх джерел в різних правоохоронних органах. Затримано полковника поліції Володимира Ценова, який обіймав посаду першого заступника начальника Департаменту стратегічних розслідувань (ДСР) Нацполіції, який курує напряму заступник керівника Офісу Президента Олег Татаров. Ценов був одним із ключових елементів МВС в історії з кол-центрами. Наступною ланкою цієї верт…

🔥84🤯30❤13👍11😁1

4 Nov 2026, 18:37 UTC≈1,740 views95 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Голова СБУ Поклад має бути звільнений та понести кримінальну відповідальність.

💯91👍4

4 Nov 2026, 17:48 UTC≈1,770 views13 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Як підтримати нашу команду - Ви знаєте. 📩 Поповнити конверт через Приват24 https://www.privat24.ua/send/4ti1c 👉Номер картки конверта 5168 7521 6322 4531 Інші варіанти на сайті: https://sprotyv.team/#donate Щиро вдячна за кожну гривню.

👍11😁2

4 Nov 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,770 views54 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Замість охання та ахання від цих відео НАБУ - дайте відповідь собі на 2 питання: скільки запитань Ви офіційно/публічно/особисто поставили за минулий місяць українським чиновникам чи депутатам? Якщо відповідь на попереднє питання 0, тоді інше питання: яким громадським активістам/організаціям Ви допомогли минулого місяця, які контролюють чиновників та депутатів? Ось і всі головні питання, чому у нас така катастрофа у …

💯43👍10👎1

4 Nov 2026, 17:27 UTC≈1,720 views46 reactionsread 5 November 2026

Ось як під час війни внутрішні вороги крадуть мільярди. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dLGhaHbWCAA І найважливіше - поки український народ не почне контролювати чиновників, все це продовжиться та буде набувати ще більших масштабів.

💯35❤9🫡2

3 Nov 2026, 10:11 UTC≈2,210 views119 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

29 загиблих, 48 безвісти зниклих. Комишуваха, Запоріжжя. Щирі співчуття🙏🙏🙏 А скільки мільярдів Іван Федоров витратив на підземні школи? СПРОТИВ робив розслідування.

😢99🤯13🙏4❤3

2 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC≈2,510 views103 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

1-й корпус НГУ Азов офіційно підтвердив, що це їх підрозділ знаходився у П. Борщагівці. Моя інформація повністю підтвердилась.

🤬72👍18👀5❤4💯4

2 Nov 2026, 17:12 UTC≈2,570 views142 reactionsread 5 November 2026

За моєю інформацією підрозділ, який катував людей у П.Борщагівці - це 1-й армійський корпус АЗОВ, який підпорядкований Національній гвардії.

🤬116🤯25😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 114 posts we hold for @mariabarabash. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@mariabarabash edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTCAnonymous Poll474 voters

Як Ви вважаєте, Зеленський знав про корупцію Ірини Мудрої, яку він призначив своїм власним підписом в указі?

  1. Так, знав92%
  2. Ні, не знав3%
  3. Не знаю5%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 114 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Марія Барабаш | СПРОТИВ” (@mariabarabash), 8,687 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/mariabarabash.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.