Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Брудні Ігри

Channel

Брудні Ігри

@plinskiymedia

Verified by Telegram

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

37,079subscribers

+3,538 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001166131325
TypeChannel
Username@plinskiymedia
DescriptionАвторський канал журналіста Євгена Плінського Мій YouTube https://youtube.com/@plinskiy Якщо хочете зв'язатися зі мною, то https://t.me/PlinskiyMediaBot чи [email protected] Слава Україні! Пизда русні!
Created14 March 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/plinskiymedia

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

33,54137,07935,3106 August 2026 — 33,541 subscribers6 August 2026 — 33,541 subscribers7 August 2026 — 33,591 subscribers8 August 2026 — 33,614 subscribers10 August 2026 — 33,649 subscribers11 August 2026 — 33,680 subscribers12 August 2026 — 33,835 subscribers13 August 2026 — 33,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,129 subscribers16 August 2026 — 34,225 subscribers17 August 2026 — 34,353 subscribers18 August 2026 — 34,424 subscribers19 August 2026 — 34,505 subscribers20 August 2026 — 34,655 subscribers21 August 2026 — 34,746 subscribers23 August 2026 — 34,845 subscribers24 August 2026 — 35,034 subscribers25 August 2026 — 35,283 subscribers27 August 2026 — 35,426 subscribers28 August 2026 — 35,580 subscribers29 August 2026 — 35,738 subscribers30 August 2026 — 35,900 subscribers31 August 2026 — 36,062 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,299 subscribers1 September 2026 — 36,326 subscribers3 September 2026 — 36,409 subscribers4 September 2026 — 36,728 subscribers7 September 2026 — 36,785 subscribers10 September 2026 — 36,987 subscribers12 September 2026 — 36,985 subscribers14 September 2026 — 37,014 subscribers16 September 2026 — 37,063 subscribers18 September 2026 — 37,079 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +3,538. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 33,010–37,610 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 13:0237,079+16
16 Sept 2026, 07:2137,063+49
14 Sept 2026, 13:3637,014+29
12 Sept 2026, 20:4136,985-2
10 Sept 2026, 19:1836,987+202
7 Sept 2026, 18:1936,785+57
4 Sept 2026, 16:2236,728+319
3 Sept 2026, 01:1636,409+83
1 Sept 2026, 21:0736,326+27
1 Sept 2026, 00:0636,299+237
31 Aug 2026, 01:5636,062+162
30 Aug 2026, 02:1335,900+162
29 Aug 2026, 00:5635,738+158
28 Aug 2026, 03:0735,580+154
27 Aug 2026, 01:0935,426+143
25 Aug 2026, 22:4535,283+249
24 Aug 2026, 23:3535,034+189
23 Aug 2026, 07:1334,845+99
21 Aug 2026, 20:2834,746+91
20 Aug 2026, 19:3434,655first reading

Engagement

80 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 84 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.3%
avg views ÷ 37,079 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,100
49 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.899%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
49
of 80 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 September 2026
Posts held80 (24 July 202623 September 2026)
Views total496,180
Reactions total4,463
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Sept 2026, 13:07 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,700
Videos
748
Links
1,810

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 23 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
27m 34s
Average length
2m 07s

Measured directly from 13 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

7,156 reactions across 77 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,14630.0%
😁1,36319.0%
🤬1,18916.6%
1,10915.5%
🔥5217.28%
🤯3164.42%
👏2273.17%
💩1962.74%
😱570.797%
👎300.419%
🥰20.028%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 80 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 23 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 80 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plinskiymedia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

23 Sept 2026, 09:10 UTC≈3,420 views42 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Яскравий приклад того, коли розголос проблеми журналістами, увага Парламенту та певні кроки з боку митниці призвели до фактичної зупинки корупційної схеми. Більше 500 мільйонів гривень за три місяці додаткових платежів в бюджет вже принесло викорінення схеми використання підробних сертифікатів EUR.1 при ввезені авто. https://t.me/UkraineCustoms/6640

👍33👏6😁21

22 Sept 2026, 17:11 UTC≈5,220 views90 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Вечірній текст на подумати нашим чиновникам та силовикам. Сьогодні росіяни вкотре били по тютюновому виробництву в Україні. Удар припав по фабриці JTI у Кременчуці. Вона закрита та не працює. Два тижні тому, 10 вересня, ударів зазнало виробництво Imperial Brands у Києві. Фабрика зазнала значних пошкоджень та зупинила роботу. 7 вересня 2026 року сім російських дронів вдарили по фабриці корпорації British American T

🔥5416👏12🤬5👍3

22 Sept 2026, 14:02 UTC≈13,100 views48 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Читачі підказали, що у своєму релізі про викриття детективами БЕБ конвертаційного центру Офіс Генпрокурора засвітив цікаву світлину. На ній зображено печатки та перелік кодів ЄДРПОУ, які, скоріш за все, мають відношення до компаній, задіяних у діяльності конвертаційного центру. Очевидно, що всіх цікавлять реальні бенефіціари цієї організації, тож можливо, мій розбір переліку допоможе наблизити це розуміння. Щонайм

👍3010🔥7👏1

22 Sept 2026, 11:42 UTC≈9,760 views74 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

В історії викриття детективами БЕБ конвертаційного центру з обігом у 23,5 мільярди є дуже важлива деталь, на яку варто звернути увагу. Реалізація цієї масштабної операції, а вона без перебільшення така, адже в схемі було задіяно 200 підприємств-клієнтів, 97 компаній-прокладок та 8 тисяч!!! ФОПів, відбулася саме в момент повного виходу ДПС України з-під контролю групи Руслана Кравченка та втрати податковою «даху Офіс

37👏20👍12🔥3😁2

22 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC≈5,600 views76 reactionsread 23 September 2026

Винесу цей коментар в окремий допис. А ви згодні з цим? Описана ситуація демонструє класичну управлінську пастку. Можливо, новий очільник Держмитслужби, спираючись на свій антикорупційний досвід, дійсно намагається перекрити схеми. Але середня ланка системи вміло перетворює цей намір на колапс для "білого" бізнесу, щоб дискредитувати саму ідею змін. Коли 96% перевірок через АСАУР мають нульовий результат, це не фі

👍678💩1

22 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTC≈4,780 views10 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @Customs_of_UkrainePoll

Задля безпеки СЗЕД та персоналу митниць чи варто відновити митні декларації типу ІМ40ЕА?

  1. Так68%
  2. Ні12%
  3. На заміну існує процедура АЕО23%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

👍81👏1

22 Sept 2026, 06:55 UTC≈18,500 views98 reactionsread 23 September 2026

На митниці назріває велика проблема. Отримую повідомлення від імпортерів та митників про великі черги на внутрішніх митницях країни та кратне уповільнення оформлення вантажів. На деяких митних постах маємо зараз кілометрові черги, що є неприпустимим в умовах реалій війни та залежності постачань товарів буквально «з коліс». І це не на кордоні, де можна списати на повільну роботу суміжників, це всередині країни. Го

👍7213🔥7😁6

20 Sept 2026, 17:02 UTC≈7,440 views48 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @SudomPoShemam

🚨 Шахрайська «диспетчерська» прямо з СІЗО: викрито банду, яка наживалася на пасажирах BlaBlaCar під час війни 📅 14 вересня 2026 року Зарічний районний суд м. Суми поставив крапку в гучній справі організованого злочинного угруповання, яке ошукало десятки українців. Про це повідомляє телеграм-канал "Судом по схемах" з посиланням на справу № 591/3237/23. 👥 Фігуранти справи (обвинувачені): ▪️ Петров Максим Ігорович ▪️

👍2816👏3👎1

20 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC≈7,540 views120 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Video

Непередодні повномасштабного вторгнення русня дуже полюбляла обстрілювати Донецьк, запускаючи снаряди та ракети з одних кварталів по іншим, та розповідаючи що це роблять ЗСУ. Тепер карма їх наздоганяє. маскофське ППО відкрито бʼє по самій москві.

🔥93👏195💩2😁1

17 Sept 2026, 08:25 UTC≈9,180 views50 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @SudomPoShemam

Posted without readable text

👍3811😁1

16 Sept 2026, 19:19 UTC≈9,300 views56 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Forwarded from @SudomPoShemam

Posted without readable text

28👍16😁6🤯5😱1

16 Sept 2026, 15:01 UTC≈8,430 views81 reactionsread 23 September 2026
Photo

Неймовірне продовження теми. Назвемо їі «Скрутки-мутки-конверти-акциз-ПДВ»

👍51🔥15😁86🤬1

Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @plinskiymedia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

22 Sept 2026, 08:37 UTCAnonymous Poll1,180 voters approx.

Задля безпеки СЗЕД та персоналу митниць чи варто відновити митні декларації типу ІМ40ЕА?

  1. Так68%
  2. Ні12%
  3. На заміну існує процедура АЕО23%

The shares total 103%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 23 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🇺🇦 Customs of Ukraine (and not only)
@Customs_of_Ukraine · 21,977
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 22 September 2026
ШО, АЗАРТНИЙ?
@sho_azartny · 126,904
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 15 August 2026
АНТИКОР
@antikor · 436,436
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 29 August 2026
НАБУ
@nab_ukraine · 47,145
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 29 August 2026
Absolution Leaks 🇪🇺
@absolutionleaks · 155,859
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
ВИЙ.Ukraine
@viyukraine · 21,860
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 September 2026
Аналітика Куща
@Analityka_Kush · 48,222
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
Dubinsky.pro
@dubinskypro · 170,017
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 12 August 2026
Tkach
@teleTKACH · 61,442
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Данило Гетманцев
@getmantsevdanil · 65,987
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 17 August 2026
➕Ігор Мосійчук 🦏
@mosiychuk72 · 505,496
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
«Дебет-Кредит» Новини
@dtkt_ua · 43,833
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
Податкова служба - ОФІЦІЙНИЙ КАНАЛ
@tax_gov_ua · 44,722
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 28 August 2026
Карточный Офис
@office_ua · 104,610
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 16 August 2026
Залізний нардеп
@yzheleznyak · 97,710
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Брудні Ігри” (@plinskiymedia), 37,079 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plinskiymedia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.