😏 Було б смішно, якби не було - правда.
🤬147💊85😁33🤡12🤯10🤮5🥴2

Channel
@e_p_2026
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,383subscribers
+147 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001463040770 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @e_p_2026 |
| Created | 21 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/e_p_2026 |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Nov 2026, 07:08 | 26,383 | +12 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:49 | 26,371 | +12 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:17 | 26,359 | -4 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 07:17 | 26,363 | -1 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 05:38 | 26,364 | -7 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 03:26 | 26,371 | -13 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 01:51 | 26,384 | +1 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:45 | 26,383 | -6 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:50 | 26,389 | -5 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 07:39 | 26,394 | +5 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 10:46 | 26,389 | -12 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 08:19 | 26,401 | -5 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:46 | 26,406 | -15 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 07:40 | 26,421 | -7 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 26,428 | +6 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 14:21 | 26,422 | -5 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 11:48 | 26,427 | -6 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 26,433 | -8 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 13:35 | 26,441 | -8 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 10:56 | 26,449 | first reading |
1,015 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 137 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,015 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026) |
| Views total | 2,866,270 |
| Reactions total | 196,605 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Nov 2026, 03:38 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 325 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
449,333 reactions across 996 posts, in 69 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 119,443 | 26.6% | |
| 👍 | 55,906 | 12.4% | |
| 🤡 | 53,522 | 11.9% | |
| 🔥 | 32,487 | 7.23% | |
| 💯 | 27,617 | 6.15% | |
| 🤮 | 23,258 | 5.18% | |
| ❤ | 23,165 | 5.16% | |
| 😢 | 16,669 | 3.71% | |
| 😁 | 16,118 | 3.59% | |
| 🤔 | 13,956 | 3.11% | |
| 🙏 | 12,190 | 2.71% | |
| 🤯 | 11,475 | 2.55% | |
| 🤣 | 10,381 | 2.31% | |
| 🖕 | 8,019 | 1.78% | |
| 💊 | 5,935 | 1.32% | |
| 😭 | 3,529 | 0.785% | |
| 💔 | 2,123 | 0.472% | |
| 😱 | 1,976 | 0.44% | |
| 👏 | 1,723 | 0.383% | |
| 🥴 | 1,101 | 0.245% | |
| 49 further kinds | 8,740 | 1.95% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 997 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 449,920 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @e_p_2026. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 38 of 414 posts held from the last 30 days (9.18%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
😏 Було б смішно, якби не було - правда.
🤬147💊85😁33🤡12🤯10🤮5🥴2
👀 Меланія Трамп написала особисті листи Зеленському та Путіну. Передати їх вона попросила голову фракції "Слуга народу" Давида Арахамію та російського представника Дмитрієва. Також під час виступу в Білому домі Меланія Трамп розповіла, що Україна та РФ письмово погодилися на її посередництво для локального припинення вогню в Олешках та навколишніх районах Херсонщини. Відповідні угоди сторони підписали 23 жовтня. Во…
🤮220🤡65😁35👍22🥱16🙏10❤8💊5
❗️ ТАКОГО ЩЕ НЕ БУЛО! Силовики під картелями! Банкова боїться “своїх” генералів?! | Є ПИТАННЯ 💬 Після оприлюднення нових шокуючих плівок НАБУ про злочинний синдикат у верхівці СБУ та Нацполіції, суспільство охопив реальний страх перед вітчизняними правоохоронцями. Спайка генералів із криміналітетом виявилася набагато страшнішою, ніж можна було уявити. Є інформація, що слідчі могли заздалегідь сигналізували Банковій …
🔥158👍43🤯37❤8🤮6💯3🤡3😈2
В Білому домі проходить зустріч Меланії Трамп і представників України та РФ за підсумками операції в Олешках почалася. Україну там представляють Лубінець і Арахамія. Росію - омбудсменка і Дмітрієв.
🤮363🤡74🤬19👍10❤3😈1
❗️ Суддя ВАКС відправив "Боксера" під варту без права внесення застави.
👍432💯39🔥17❤9🤡1😈1😢1
Фігуранту "Карфагену" - Віталію Рибалко ("Боксеру") - САП просить запобіжний захід у вигляді перебування під вартою без альтернативи застави. Ризики, повʼязані з перебуванням Рибалка на волі: переховування; знищення чи спотворення речей та документів; вплив на свідків; ризик перешкодження іншим чином. Може створювати фізичну загрозу потерпілим та свідкам. Рибалка вже судять у Шевченківському суді Києва за вимагання…
👍341🔥47🤯8❤7🥱1😢1
❗️Фігурант на прізвисько "Паша" має громадянство Угорщини. Про це зазначив прокурор САП під час засідання ВАКС щодо запобіжного заходу "Боксеру". Це, зокрема, пояснює, як угрупуванню вдавалося діяти і в інших країнах, повідомив ЦПК.
🤬242🤯41🤮5🥱3😈2❤1🤣1
❗️ У ВАКС також обирають запобіжний захід іншому фігуранту справи "Карфаген" – Віталію Рибалку. На плівках він згадується як "Боксер". За версією слідства, саме він був серед виконавців кривавих нападів та побиттів в інтересах картелю. Як з'ясував Антикорупційний центр "Межа", Віталій Рибалко – це спортсмен із Житомирщини та засновник боксерського клубу "Удар-Коростень". Разом із поплічником на прізвисько "Паша" він…
🤬262🔥67🤯56❤7😈4😢4🤮3🤡2
ВАКС відправив Ценова під варту з заставою в 15 млн грн. Перший заступник начальника Департаменту стратегічних розслідувань Нацполіції, за даними слідства, відповідав за прикриття незаконних колцентрів з боку поліції.
👍210🤯43🤷♂13🤮10🤬6🔥5🥰2😢2
❗️ Прокурор САП пояснив, що саме інкримінують Ценову, передає Центр протидії корупції із зали суду. Не пізніше січня 2026 року організатори злочинної групи Осіпов ("Кримінал") та "Мексиканець" залучили Ценова для прикриття своєї діяльності. Зокрема, Осіпов скидав адреси шахрайських колцентрів, а Департамент Ценова не проводив там жодних слідчих дій. Одного разу фігуранти переплутали адресу, через що обшук відбувся…
👍190🤬121🤯41🤮10❤6🔥5😁3👎1
Фігурант «Карфагену» з Нацполу Ценов мешкає у будинку під Києвом площею понад 500 квадратів і отримує близько 1 млн грн на рік Перший заступник начальника Департаменту стратегічних розслідувань (ДСР) Національної поліції Володимир Ценов задекларував будинку у Крюківщині під Києвом та кілька квартир. ▪️У декларації за 2025 рік Ценов згадав про будинок площею 572 квадрати, квартиру у Києві площею майже 60 квадратів…
👍149🤬116🤯38😁9😈6🤮4❤3👏1
❗️ До Вищого антикорупційного суду доставили фігуранта справи "Карфаген" – високопосадовця Нацполіції Володимира Ценова. ВАКС починає обирати йому запобіжний захід, прокуратура проситиме тримання під вартою з альтернативою застави у 20 млн грн. Ценов обіймає посаду першого заступника начальника Департаменту стратегічних розслідувань (ДСР). За версією слідства, він "кришував" шахрайські колцентри зі сторони поліції. …
👍329🤬70❤10🤔10🤡4🤣2🤮2😈2
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,015 posts we hold for @e_p_2026. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@e_p_2026 edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Є ПИТАННЯ” (@e_p_2026), 26,383 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/e_p_2026.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.