Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for CYNIC

Channel

CYNIC

@cynic2020

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

20,269subscribers

-379 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001412170631
TypeChannel
Username@cynic2020
Created28 October 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/cynic2020

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

20,26920,64820,458.56 August 2026 — 20,648 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,648 subscribers6 August 2026 — 20,644 subscribers8 August 2026 — 20,633 subscribers9 August 2026 — 20,617 subscribers10 August 2026 — 20,610 subscribers11 August 2026 — 20,598 subscribers12 August 2026 — 20,588 subscribers13 August 2026 — 20,578 subscribers14 August 2026 — 20,565 subscribers16 August 2026 — 20,543 subscribers17 August 2026 — 20,533 subscribers18 August 2026 — 20,527 subscribers19 August 2026 — 20,520 subscribers20 August 2026 — 20,508 subscribers21 August 2026 — 20,500 subscribers23 August 2026 — 20,488 subscribers24 August 2026 — 20,477 subscribers25 August 2026 — 20,472 subscribers26 August 2026 — 20,469 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,465 subscribers28 August 2026 — 20,453 subscribers30 August 2026 — 20,446 subscribers31 August 2026 — 20,431 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,420 subscribers1 September 2026 — 20,406 subscribers3 September 2026 — 20,395 subscribers4 September 2026 — 20,384 subscribers6 September 2026 — 20,356 subscribers10 September 2026 — 20,327 subscribers12 September 2026 — 20,311 subscribers14 September 2026 — 20,289 subscribers15 September 2026 — 20,269 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 40 days, net -379. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 20,212–20,705 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 18:2120,269-20
14 Sept 2026, 01:0020,289-22
12 Sept 2026, 09:5620,311-16
10 Sept 2026, 03:3720,327-29
6 Sept 2026, 22:2220,356-28
4 Sept 2026, 11:1920,384-11
3 Sept 2026, 01:1620,395-11
1 Sept 2026, 23:4620,406-14
1 Sept 2026, 01:5920,420-11
31 Aug 2026, 03:0320,431-15
30 Aug 2026, 00:1720,446-7
28 Aug 2026, 22:0620,453-12
28 Aug 2026, 00:1220,465-4
26 Aug 2026, 23:1520,469-3
25 Aug 2026, 23:4220,472-5
24 Aug 2026, 23:0320,477-11
23 Aug 2026, 09:2520,488-12
21 Aug 2026, 19:3920,500-8
20 Aug 2026, 16:1220,508-12
19 Aug 2026, 14:2220,520first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 28 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 November 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
3m 26s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

17,365 reactions across 20 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍5,32830.7%
🤔2,42213.9%
💯1,87710.8%
1,7349.99%
🤬1,2657.28%
🔥1,0526.06%
🙏8825.08%
🤯7044.05%
😢4752.74%
🤡4452.56%
😁2221.28%
🙈1951.12%
👏1751.01%
🥱1390.8%
👀810.466%
🖕630.363%
😱530.305%
🍾490.282%
🌚260.15%
🤣250.144%
18 further kinds1530.881%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 17,365 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2024 to 11 November 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
113
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
53
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @cynic2020. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 October 2024 to 11 November 2024. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Nov 2024, 22:56 UTC≈222,000 views1,097 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Ближайшие 4-5 месяцев станут решающими в войне , – Reuters со ссылкой на высокопоставленного украинского чиновника. «Война уже близится к концу, надеюсь. Сейчас мы определим позиции для обеих сторон на переговорах, стартовые позиции». При этом коллеги из Республиканской Партии говорят, что "к концу января положение украинцев на фронте нужно будет максимально усилить". "Чем сильнее будет оперативная обстановка на фр

👍588🤔223🙏10663🤡53🌚25🥱12💊10

10 Nov 2024, 13:05 UTC≈171,000 views826 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Разрыв треугольника?! Трамп намерен разорвать углубляющиеся связи между противниками США - Китаем, Россией, Ираном и КНДР, — The Hill Для этого он будет использовать свою фирменную смесь воинственных угроз и дружеских отношений с некоторыми диктаторами мира. Вот мы и возвращаемся к злополучной модели треугольника РФ-КНР-США, цель которого вывести любую Холодную Войну в противостояние 2к1. Тот, кто добивается пропо

👍434🤔24149🤡48🔥14🥱14💯11🤣7

9 Nov 2024, 22:52 UTC≈62,100 views1,251 reactionsread 3 September 2026

В ближайшее время ожидается заявление о дате прекращения огня , на какой границе оно будет действовать, и гарантии безопасности для Украины. Этот план на стадии подготовки, — премьер-министр Польши. Тут стоит уточнить, что в СМИ слили информацию, что во время созвона Зеленского и Трампа избранный президент США заявил о том, что "порадует Украину", а также то, что "в нем украинцы не разочаруются". Также после появле

🔥522🙏325🤔158👍14038🤡33🤣13👏9

9 Nov 2024, 08:01 UTC≈36,800 views809 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Друзья из Республиканской Партии, обсуждая длинный поздравительный созвон Трампа и Зеленского, уточняют, что "партии не известно содержание беседы". Также они говорят, что "Трамп и в период первого президентства о деталях переговоров по международной политике не делился с партией: даже советники пытались понять содержание созвонов по тем задачам, что он им ставил на будущее". Сейчас эти коллеги говорят, что "Трамп п

👍489🤔23436🤡22🔥97😐6🐳2

8 Nov 2024, 18:46 UTC≈26,700 views814 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @ToBeOr_Official

Разговор Зеленского с Трампом в день его избрания длился около 25 минут. Во время звонка к ним присоединился Илон Маск. То, что Зеленский услышал от Трампа, в некоторой мере его успокоило, - Axios со ссылкой на источники. Ещё детали: ▪️Зеленский почувствовал положительный сигнал в том, что их разговор состоялся так быстро после избрания Трампа. Звонок прошёл хорошо и НЕ оставил Зеленского с чувством отчаяния. ▪️Ма

👍530🤔20744🔥15🤡13👏2🐳1🖕1

7 Nov 2024, 18:01 UTC≈44,800 views892 reactionsread 3 September 2026

"План Трампа": а есть ли альтернатива? Западные издания сообщают подробности плана Трампа, упоминая, что настоящий план нового президента не знают даже его советники. План, по их мнению, должен включать заморозку фронта по линии боевого соприкосновения. И тут возникает вопрос, а есть ли альтернативы у Украины в условиях, когда: - демократическая администрация тормозила поставки военной помощи, чтобы не спровоциров

👍505🤔25945🤨22🤡19😢12💊9💯9

6 Nov 2024, 13:44 UTC≈43,200 views1,180 reactions53 Starsread 3 September 2026

"Мертвая хватка" Д. Трампа Триумф Д. Трампа и Республиканской Партии достаточно плохо сказался на настроениях Москвы, Ирана, Северной Кореи и Китая. Страны чудовищной оси (за исключением РФ) открыто поддерживали осторожный курс Демократической Партии, понимая, что непоследовательная политика Байдена, основанная на страхе эскалации, ведёт к росту террористического потенциала как Ирана, так и Северной Кореи (последня

👍700🤔32250🤡48🙏26😁9👏8💯7

6 Nov 2024, 08:42 UTC≈34,200 views586 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Триумф Республиканской Партии продолжается. Д. Трамп может получить, помимо кресла президента, большинство в Сенате (уже точно) и Палате Представителей (очень вероятно). Это как раз то, о чем я говорил, когда неоднократно писал, что "Харрис - худший кандидат от Демократической Партии".

😢280👍11972🤔54💯43🍾9🤬8🐳1

6 Nov 2024, 07:02 UTC≈33,800 views578 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💥❗️Трамп побеждает на выборах президента США! Колоссален шанс разгромной победы (Трамп берет практически все колеблющиеся штаты).

🤯246🔥125🤬67👍44🤔28😢17😱17🙈12

6 Nov 2024, 06:01 UTC≈35,000 views280 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Для "экспертов", которые высчитывают непонятные пропорции, утверждая, что у К. Харрис есть шансы. Для победы необходимо 270 голосов выборщиков. Сейчас у К. Харрис - 189 У Д. Трампа - 246 Т.е. нужно набрать 24 голоса, и Трамп побеждает. Смотрим на предварительные результаты. Висконсин. 86% подсчитано. 51,1% - Трамп; 47,3% - Харрис. Это 10 голосов (из 24 необходимых). Мичиган. 15 голосов Подсчитано всего 62%. Тра

👏96🤬67👍43🤔35🤯17😢12😈43

6 Nov 2024, 05:21 UTC≈32,200 views320 reactionsread 3 September 2026

NYT дает Трампу 88% шансов на победу в выборах. Polymarket — 94,4% По предварительным опросам, Трамп лидирует в 6 из 8 колеблющихся штатов. 👆Наши прогнозы полностью подтверждаются, несмотря на оголтелые крики некоторых сторонников демократов, которые не хотели верить в то, что Трамп может победить. Перед началом подсчёта я сообщил, что "методы реального подсчёта электоральных треков указывают на то, что шанс К. Ха

👍131😢88🤔48🤬27🖕65😐5😁4

5 Nov 2024, 21:55 UTC≈31,300 views469 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Предварительные данные указывают на достаточно убедительную победу Д. Трампа на президентских выборах. Вся продемократическая пресса сообщает, что их "модели подсчёта" указывают на преимущество К. Харрис. Коллеги-профессионалы, работающие с массивами данных и в области политического консультирования, как и я, разводят руками, читая прогнозы демократических СМИ. Методы реального подсчёта электоральных треков указыв

🙈183🤡95👀74👍55🤔31😁109🤣5

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @cynic2020. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Сито Сократа
@sytosokrata · 159,188
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 24 August 2026
Юрій Богданов
@yb_ua · 26,448
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
Шрайк
@RomanShrike · 42,246
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Алексей Копытько
@kopytkoav · 26,791
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Кушнер / Kushner
@Kushnar_media · 45,030
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
Люстэрка ўлады
@MirrorRB · 65,059
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 August 2026
Зеркало | Новости
@zerkalo_io · 104,455
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 15 August 2026
Беларусь головного мозга
@belamova · 37,678
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 31 August 2026
Чай з малинавым варэннем — Беларусь Новости
@belteanews · 28,610
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 9 September 2026
Хартия-97%
@charter97_org · 29,337
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
Александр Коваленко
@zloyodessit · 82,370
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 18 August 2026
🇵🇱Польский консультант
@polandconsult · 24,757
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 September 2026
Шрайк Ньюс
@ShrikeNews · 96,694
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 16 August 2026

This channel appears in 13 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“CYNIC” (@cynic2020), 20,269 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/cynic2020.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.