Працюю у медіа та політиці більше 10 років. Обожнюю інсайди і все те, що пошепки говорять між собою політики. Не маю цензури 🔥 але пам’ятаю, що головний ворог - це росія.
Для зв’язку: @Zabelina_Y
ютуб: https://youtube.com/@zabelina9?si=9I6sjb8M-QtLkWwX
Created
27 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net +301. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,391–8,859 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Nov 2026, 07:06
8,761
-8
1 Nov 2026, 15:46
8,769
-11
29 Oct 2026, 22:16
8,780
-9
27 Oct 2026, 07:49
8,789
-16
24 Oct 2026, 14:17
8,805
+61
21 Oct 2026, 15:56
8,744
+43
18 Oct 2026, 03:16
8,701
-3
15 Oct 2026, 09:21
8,704
+10
12 Oct 2026, 14:41
8,694
-17
5 Oct 2026, 14:40
8,711
-29
28 Sept 2026, 05:59
8,740
+31
18 Sept 2026, 13:17
8,709
+1
14 Sept 2026, 10:41
8,708
+9
10 Sept 2026, 19:02
8,699
+10
5 Sept 2026, 17:57
8,689
+25
1 Sept 2026, 14:12
8,664
+1
29 Aug 2026, 08:47
8,663
+74
26 Aug 2026, 05:18
8,589
+143
19 Aug 2026, 08:57
8,446
+1
16 Aug 2026, 18:45
8,445
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 30 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
87.4%
avg views ÷ 8,761 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,660
36 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
36
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held
91 (17 July 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total
275,770
Reactions total
4,688
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
5 Nov 2026, 22:30 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
603
Videos
156
Links
765
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
4m 08s
Average length
1m 02s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
13,529 reactions across 91 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
4,301
31.8%
❤
2,956
21.8%
😁
2,322
17.2%
🤔
1,499
11.1%
🤬
1,186
8.77%
🔥
530
3.92%
🤯
511
3.78%
😱
106
0.784%
🥰
73
0.54%
👏
45
0.333%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13,529 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (13.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Від України виступає Давид Арахамія, який сказав, що від початку у місію порятунку людей з Олешок вірило 5% людей, 95% були налаштовані скептично.
Дмитро Лубінець якраз і вручив нашу нагороду для Меланії.
Меланія дякує президенту Зеленському і українському народу.
Класний хід. Якщо, і я думаю, це вдасться, продовжувати і на інших територіях - це буде добре.
Розпочалась зустріч Меланії Трамп з українськими та російськими представниками у Білому домі.
Від української сторони виступають Давид Арахамія та Дмитро Лубінець, від російської - дмітрієв та лантратова.
Трансляція йде на офіційному каналі Білого дому.
Як я розумію, українська сторона якраз має вручити орден Княгині Ольги І ступеню Меланії сьогодні.
Джей ді Венс відрефлексував щодо програшу республіканців на виборах до Конгресу.
По суті, він звинуватив у цьому війну в Ірані, проти якої виступав від початку, і на певний момент навіть був відсторонений від планування.
Венс зазначив, що війну треба завершити і перезавантажити відносини з Ізраїлем.
Венс буде кандидатом на виборах від республіканців 99%, і партія буде зараз більше дрейфувати у його бік. Вірніше, вж…
А ще, зверніть увагу, що під час подій на Борщагівці, так майже непомітно по деяким тг каналам йшли посили зі спробою розкачати відставку міністра внутрішніх справ, вже нового, Виговського, близького до Татарова.
Але не злетіло.
Інтересантів такої хвилі могло бути декілька - або з СБУ;) або Клименко, той, що вже колишній міністр внутрішніх справ.
А ви кажете, вибори у конгрес, коли у нас тут такі події )))
Які плівки будуть наступними, випускала я відео у своєму ютубі в кінці вересня.
Це було лише питання часу, коли щодо кришування кол центрів НАБУ прийде до СБУ, після офісу генпрокурора.
Дука, у якого обшуки, це людина безпосередньо наближена до в.о голови СБУ Поклада, хоча раніше Дука ближче був до Малюка.
😝Але звісно, ви завжди можете почитати експертів, які плутають конгрес і палату представників, які вам напишуть, що Трампу точно оголосять імпічмент і ще порадять Україні в цей процес влізти, а не тихо шукати підтримки на місці у США з різних боків, включно вже (!) серед кандидатів на вибори президента США.
Це, як то кажуть, ваш вибір.
Трохи тверезості щодо виборів у США.
На все треба дивитись через призму України, бо враження, ніби це у нас вибори пройшли, а не у США.
Не стільки важливо для нас, яка більшість буде у Конгресі, хоча, вже очевидно, що таки демократи виграли обидві палати, як важливим є майбутня група дружби, проукраїнські Кокуси у Конгресі, адже велика частина прихильників України, у тому числі, серед республіканців, не потрапили в …
👍90❤23😁6🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @kuluary_Za. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Олександр Нотевський @notevskyi · 25,847 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 September 2026
Юрій Богданов @yb_ua · 26,172 Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Кулуари Забєліної” (@kuluary_Za), 8,761 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kuluary_Za.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.