Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Апостроф | Новини України

Channel

Апостроф | Новини України

@ApostropheUA

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,058subscribers

-2,929 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001502720092
TypeChannel
Username@ApostropheUA
DescriptionОнлайн-медіа «Апостроф | Новини України» призначене для осіб старше 21 року. Ідентифікатор в Реєстрі: R40-07492. 01010, м. Київ, Печерський р-н, узвіз Дніпровський, буд. 1, +38 093 395 89 55, [email protected]
Created9 September 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held37
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ApostropheUA

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@ApostropheUA/115349 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC@apostrophe_kyiv/944447 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC1.00under a minute
@ApostropheUA/115355 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC@apostrophe_kyiv/944507 Aug 2026, 11:47 UTC1.00under a minute
@ApostropheUA/115358 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:15 UTC@apostrophe_kyiv/944547 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC1.005 minutes
@apostrophe_kyiv/944537 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC@ApostropheUA/115360 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@ApostropheUA/115402 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC@apostrophe_kyiv/944837 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC1.00under a minute
@ApostropheUA/115406 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC@apostrophe_kyiv/944867 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@apostrophe_kyiv22 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@apostrophe_kyiv (14–8)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 14 of the 14 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 48 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @ApostropheUA — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_mutual, last confirmed 8 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

5,42610,9888,2076 August 2026 — 10,987 subscribers6 August 2026 — 10,988 subscribers7 August 2026 — 10,957 subscribers8 August 2026 — 10,911 subscribers9 August 2026 — 10,873 subscribers10 August 2026 — 10,836 subscribers11 August 2026 — 10,817 subscribers12 August 2026 — 10,808 subscribers13 August 2026 — 10,775 subscribers14 August 2026 — 10,731 subscribers16 August 2026 — 10,641 subscribers17 August 2026 — 10,596 subscribers18 August 2026 — 10,582 subscribers19 August 2026 — 10,579 subscribers20 August 2026 — 10,561 subscribers22 August 2026 — 10,508 subscribers23 August 2026 — 10,462 subscribers25 August 2026 — 10,426 subscribers26 August 2026 — 10,395 subscribers27 August 2026 — 10,368 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,911 subscribers30 August 2026 — 9,814 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,908 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,797 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,598 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,374 subscribers26 September 2026 — 5,426 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,861 subscribers11 October 2026 — 8,189 subscribers14 October 2026 — 8,164 subscribers18 October 2026 — 8,110 subscribers21 October 2026 — 8,108 subscribers24 October 2026 — 8,088 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,049 subscribers30 October 2026 — 8,020 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,987 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,058 subscribers8,0586 August 20265 November 2026
37 measurements spanning 91 days, net -2,929. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,592–11,822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 09:168,058+71
2 Nov 2026, 12:447,987-33
30 Oct 2026, 04:558,020-29
27 Oct 2026, 01:478,049-39
24 Oct 2026, 09:388,088-20
21 Oct 2026, 00:358,108-2
18 Oct 2026, 00:298,110-54
14 Oct 2026, 21:168,164-25
11 Oct 2026, 13:598,189+328
5 Oct 2026, 07:427,861+2,435
26 Sept 2026, 14:175,426-2,948
15 Sept 2026, 16:568,374-224
12 Sept 2026, 02:008,598-199
8 Sept 2026, 01:378,797-111
2 Sept 2026, 23:458,908-906
30 Aug 2026, 20:179,814-97
28 Aug 2026, 01:149,911-457
27 Aug 2026, 03:2610,368-27
26 Aug 2026, 03:1110,395-31
25 Aug 2026, 01:3310,426first reading

Engagement

691 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 43 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.85%
avg views ÷ 8,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
310
109 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.31%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
109
of 691 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 107 of 109 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held691 (5 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total33,806
Reactions total773
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 23:38 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈69,900
Videos
≈24,300
Links
≈63,600

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 5 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7h 19m
Average length
1m 22s

Measured directly from 322 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,401 reactions across 625 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 14.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍65214.8%
🤬57813.1%
❤50511.5%
🤔3728.45%
🔥2525.73%
😁2495.66%
💯2415.48%
🙏2044.64%
🤯1944.41%
🤡1663.77%
🤮1302.95%
😢1242.82%
💔1132.57%
😭1002.27%
🖕932.11%
😐671.52%
😱651.48%
👏551.25%
🤣521.18%
💩220.5%
31 further kinds1673.79%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 647 of the 691 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,532 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 691 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 17 of 109 posts held from the last 30 days (15.6%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 21:00 UTC186 views4 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸Фейкова швидка в ТікТоці та спроба розхитати Майдан - це чергова провокація росіян, що розвалилася, — Михайло Шейтельман у програмі «Контексти Руно» Розслідування незалежних журналістів викрило, що скандал із псевдолікаркою був постановкою, спрямованою на підбурювання суспільства та дестабілізацію ситуації всередині воюючої країни. ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ на Апостроф TV🟥

👍2💯2

5 Nov 2026, 20:50 UTC205 views6 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚡️Військові проти проведення виборів, бо не зможуть проголосувати, — Зеленський. 🔴Читайте Апостроф у Telegram

❤5🤡1

5 Nov 2026, 20:40 UTC222 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸Трамп живе у вигаданому минулому, а американці обирають сьогодення, — Михайло Шейтельман у програмі «Контексти Руно» Американцям абсолютно байдуже, як Трамп воював би пів століття тому у В’єтнамі чи брав би Київ за три дні: суспільство турбують високі ціни, хаос у владі та реальні проблеми сьогодення. ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ на Апостроф TV🟥

👍2

5 Nov 2026, 20:35 UTC225 views5 reactionsread 5 November 2026

🇺🇸 У Білому домі та Держдепартаменті спростовують чутки про відставку Рубіо заради виборів-2028 Там заперечили інформацію медіа про те, що держсекретар Марко Рубіо нібито готується піти з команди Дональда Трампа для старту власної президентської кампанії. 🔴Читайте Апостроф у Telegram

😁3🤔2

5 Nov 2026, 20:20 UTC247 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸Куди зник самовпевнений індик: Трамп повністю розгублений і налетів лобом на стіну, — Михайло Шейтельман у програмі «Контексти Руно» Замість звичного войовничого популізму в розмовах із пресою з’явився зовсім інший, приголомшений політик, який уперше не знає, як виправдати власні системні помилки. ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ на Апостроф TV🟥

😁1

5 Nov 2026, 20:09 UTC275 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸Трамп перетворився на токсичний актив: Джей Ді Венс намагається відхреститися від нього після провалу, — Михайло Шейтельман у програмі «Контексти Руно» Щоб зберегти шанси на майбутнє у великій політиці, віцепрезиденту доводиться терміново відповзати від власного лідера, який розпочав війну з Іраном і так і не зміг її закінчити. ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ на Апостроф TV🟥

👍1😁1

5 Nov 2026, 20:00 UTC283 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸«ШЕЙТЕЛЬМАН: Трамп налетів лобом на стіну!»: кінець вигаданого світу, провал з Іраном та провокації РФ | Контексти Руно Дивіться у програмі «Контексти Руно» за участю політтехнолога та публіциста Михайла Шейтельмана. ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ на Апостроф TV🟥

🤔2👎1

5 Nov 2026, 19:55 UTC292 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸«Ті, хто був найближче до Трампа, програли найбільше»: крах республіканців очищує систему США, — Майкл Макфол у програмі «Хід Тузова» Списати такий результат на локальні проблеми чи інфляцію неможливо — це загальнонаціональний вирок політиці останніх двох років, який запускає пошук нових, поміркованих лідерів на майбутні вибори. Дивіться ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ🟥

🤔2👍1

5 Nov 2026, 19:50 UTC296 views8 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

👀 Ми можемо розглянути можливість проведення онлайн-виборів, але парламент повинен знайти рішення, — Зеленський 🔴Читайте Апостроф у Telegram

👎4🤔3🤡1

5 Nov 2026, 19:45 UTC293 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸80% американців категорично проти Путіна і вважають величезною помилкою називати його другом, — політолог Майкл Макфол у програмі «Хід Тузова» Американське суспільство не сприймає екстремальних кроків у зовнішній політиці, тому в оновленому парламенті неодмінно сформується нова коаліція на підтримку України, яка блокуватиме будь-яке зближення з Кремлем. Дивіться ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ🟥

👍10🤮1

5 Nov 2026, 19:35 UTC313 views10 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Video

🔸Епоха безконтрольності минула: Конгрес викличе команду Трампа на жорсткі слухання щодо угод із Росією, — Майкл Макфол у програмі «Хід Тузова» Демократична більшість отримала законне право примусово допитувати соратників Трампа щодо спроб домовитися про «Північні потоки» чи купівлю російського пального, вимагаючи публічних звітів під присягою. Дивіться ВЖЕ ЗАРАЗ🟥

👍8👀1🤯1

5 Nov 2026, 19:25 UTC345 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026

⚡️Люди перекрили дорогу в Києві через відсутність світла, – Зеленський Президент заявив, що після звернення до міністра МВС з’ясувалося, що на енергооб’єкті працювало недостатньо ремонтників. Поліцейські привели всіх електриків на об’єкт, після чого люди розійшлися. «Не можна ремонтувати в розвалочку» 🔴Читайте Апостроф у Telegram

😁4🙏4🗿2❤1🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 691 posts we hold for @ApostropheUA. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@ApostropheUA edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
9 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Бровари Today 🇺🇦
@brov_today · 20,471
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Апостроф | Новини України” (@ApostropheUA), 8,058 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ApostropheUA.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.