Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Виктор Першиков

Channel

Виктор Першиков

@viktor_pershikov

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,388subscribers

+350 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001643919609
TypeChannel
Username@viktor_pershikov
Created13 March 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/viktor_pershikov

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

9,0389,3889,2135 August 2026 — 9,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,038 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,046 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,059 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,088 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,104 subscribers22 August 2026 — 9,117 subscribers25 August 2026 — 9,140 subscribers28 August 2026 — 9,123 subscribers31 August 2026 — 9,186 subscribers4 September 2026 — 9,303 subscribers9 September 2026 — 9,323 subscribers13 September 2026 — 9,336 subscribers16 September 2026 — 9,388 subscribers5 August 202616 September 2026
15 measurements spanning 42 days, net +350. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,986–9,441 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 14:199,388+52
13 Sept 2026, 03:159,336+13
9 Sept 2026, 11:579,323+20
4 Sept 2026, 13:179,303+117
31 Aug 2026, 18:579,186+63
28 Aug 2026, 10:429,123-17
25 Aug 2026, 04:079,140+23
22 Aug 2026, 01:179,117+13
18 Aug 2026, 13:229,104+16
15 Aug 2026, 17:379,088+24
12 Aug 2026, 06:449,064+5
9 Aug 2026, 09:119,059+13
6 Aug 2026, 13:049,046+8
6 Aug 2026, 02:529,038no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:019,038first reading

Engagement

151 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 32 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.6%
avg views ÷ 9,388 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,400
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 151 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 25 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held151 (29 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total60,030
Reactions total851
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 57s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,091 reactions across 131 posts, in 27 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,00519.7%
💯70613.9%
🔥63212.4%
👍60711.9%
custom 53415485327991383634528.88%
custom 54341209479320843423246.36%
😎1733.40%
👀1522.99%
😢1432.81%
1422.79%
🤔891.75%
🐳881.73%
🤝871.71%
🌚691.36%
🤩661.30%
🤬651.28%
🎉521.02%
❤‍🔥500.982%
custom 5456278881780644392430.845%
🙏340.668%
7 further kinds1122.20%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 150 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,941 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 10:33 UTC≈1,230 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @mashmoneymash

Россияне за полгода перевели мошенникам больше 1 млрд рублей в криптовалюте. ЦБ связал эти деньги с 2,6 тыс. кошельков, которые использовали нелегальные финансовые проекты. Всего за январь–июнь регулятор выявил почти 2,9 тыс. финансовых хитрецов. Значительная часть схем работала через интернет, а больше 74% обнаруженных пирамид принимали деньги именно в крипте. Для государства миллиард украденных рублей может стать

🌚7

28 Aug 2026, 07:40 UTC≈1,630 views28 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Коллеги из Chainalysis наконец-то раскрыли детали длившейся несколько месяцев операции "Маяк" ("Lighthouse"), в которой было задействовано множество крипто-инвестигаторов, участников индустрии и правоохранительных органов нескольких стран. Целью операции был поиск участников сетей, связанных с распространением материалов о сексуальном насилии над детьми (CSAM). Масштаб выявлен приличный: изучили 29 120 криптоадресов

💯21🤔4🙏2🔥1

27 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈2,140 views38 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

War-street. PERSHIKOV

😢19custom 54341209479320843428👀52🎉2👍2

27 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC≈1,990 viewsread 28 August 2026

Ну вот и еще в одном интересующем меня активе фактуры подвезли. Ethena направит всю чистую выручку экосистемы на обратный выкуп ENA с рынка. Предложение уже одобрил комитет по рискам, теперь за запуск голосуют холдеры. Также в Ethena Foundation объявили о выкупе заблокированных токенов у ряда крупных ранних инвесторов, которые продавали ENA последние 9 месяцев. Договорились отменить будущие ежемесячные анлоки венчу

27 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC≈2,100 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Предложение Solana о сокращении инфляции в два раза за счет сжигания части комиссии набрало кворум за день до окончания голосования: "явка" составила 33,84%, а 25% проголосовали «за». В случае принятия предложения темпы дефляции Solana удвоятся до 30%, что приведет к сокращению эмиссии SOL примерно на 18,9 млн токенов в течение шести лет. SOL +10%+14% за сутки. PERSHIKOV

🔥15👀3

27 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC≈1,910 views19 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @LexagencyLawStream

Следующим этапом окажется осознание того, что выдавливание криптофиатного обмена в подполье сделает невозможной работу правоохранительных органов по раскрытию преступлений, совершенных с использованием криптовалюты. 💬💬💬💬➡️ подписаться на канал

custom 54562788817806443928💯4custom 54341209479320843424😎3

27 Aug 2026, 13:09 UTC≈5,370 views23 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Санкционные ограничения Запада могут превратить Россию в рынок "крашеной" криптовалюты - глава Финам - ТАСС Good morning, sweet princess😄

😎9🐳6😢4custom 54341209479320843424

27 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC≈2,160 views21 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Евро к рублю на февральских уровнях, выше сотки, к юаню деревянный летит вниз уже на 2% за день. Очень вкусно, конечно, но отчасти немного волнительно. Как никак, о судьбах страны еженощно думаю🥺 Набранные мной отечественные папиры после плевка на 9-10% (из ожидаемых мной 30%) вернулись плюс-минус туда, откуда стартовали, и кажется что пересиживать тут, при наличии неплохих альтернатив вроде инвалютных историй на от

🤝14😢5🐳1😘1

27 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈2,140 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Video

В России появятся саморегулируемые организации (СРО) для крипообменников. Это требование закона «О цифровых валютах и цифровых правах», который поэтапно вступает в силу с 1 сентября. СРО получат возможность устанавливать профессиональные стандарты и консолидировать позицию рынка. Внезапно😄а давайте почитаем что Виктор предлагал еще в 2022 году, пункт 3 в частности: https://t.me/viktor_pershikov/965 PERSHIKOV

🔥12

27 Aug 2026, 07:36 UTC≈2,160 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026

В регионе - крупнейшие в стране газодобытчики, в первую очередь Устюртский ГХК, поэтому выбор Каракалпакстана для майнинг- и AI-кластера очевиден: копеечное топливо для ГПУ установок и профицитность даже при не высоком курсе BTC, особенно после следующего халвинга, который состоится меньше чем через два года для которого очень желательно чтобы биток стоил хотя бы 120k, и чтобы активность в сети была достаточная для з

84

26 Aug 2026, 17:54 UTC≈2,100 views35 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Forwarded from @tb_invest_official

Posted without readable text

23custom 54562788817806443924😍3custom 54341209479320843423👍2

26 Aug 2026, 10:51 UTC≈2,110 views32 reactionsread 28 August 2026

Очень надеюсь, что предложения "из народа" ко второму чтению по законопроекту № 1193493-8 "О внесении изменений в Уголовный кодекс Российской Федерации и Уголовно-процессуальный кодекс Российской Федерации" будут учтены. Имею ввиду то, что касается майнинга и отрасли добычи крипты в РФ. В частности, очень бы хотелось видеть соблюдение баланса между комфортом майнеров, от которых власти ждут обеления, и непосредствен

179custom 54341209479320843424🎉2

Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @viktor_pershikov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@viktor_pershikov edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
28 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 40 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Менделеевщина!
@mendeleevshina · 23,888
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 17 September 2026
Миша Жуховицкий
@juhovitskiy · 41,048
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Крипто сливы
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,760
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026
Bitpapa Media
@bitpapa_io · 106,971
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
КИТЫ Инвестиций🐋
@kitinvest · 28,665
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 9 September 2026
Cartesius channel
@LexagencyLawStream · 29,614
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 8 September 2026
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,477
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Тот самый 115-ФЗ
@tot115fz · 26,517
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 September 2026
Владимир Туров | Бизнес и рост
@turov · 48,880
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
КриптоСаня
@sanyaizdagestana · 31,747
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
BlackAudit
@BlackAudit · 52,169
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 August 2026
CryptoPizza News
@cryptopizza_news · 27,760
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Satoshkin
@satoshkin · 31,927
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 5 September 2026
FOMOHOMO
@FOMOHOMO · 27,192
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
Tom Capital
@tomcapital · 31,440
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 6 September 2026
ForkLog
@forklog · 92,345
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 August 2026
CC | Крипто Вакансии
@careers_crypto · 25,766
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 13 September 2026
MarketTwits
@markettwits · 336,496
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 10 August 2026
#неинвестсовет by Alex Butmanov
@dtiAlgo · 37,289
Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 31 August 2026

This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Виктор Першиков” (@viktor_pershikov), 9,388 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/viktor_pershikov.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.