Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for FOMO.press

Channel

FOMO.press

@fomopress

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,990subscribers

-205 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001647483731
TypeChannel
Username@fomopress
Created16 April 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/fomopress

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9906,1956,092.56 August 2026 — 6,195 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,195 subscribers9 August 2026 — 6,185 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,178 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,168 subscribers19 August 2026 — 6,166 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,160 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,152 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,149 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,147 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,144 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,133 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,123 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,122 subscribers1 October 2026 — 6,085 subscribers7 October 2026 — 6,068 subscribers13 October 2026 — 6,055 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,048 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,042 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,029 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,025 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,018 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,005 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,998 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,990 subscribers6 August 20266 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,959–6,226 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 03:095,990-8
3 Nov 2026, 00:565,998-7
31 Oct 2026, 04:006,005-13
28 Oct 2026, 02:176,018-7
25 Oct 2026, 06:286,025-4
22 Oct 2026, 16:076,029-13
19 Oct 2026, 01:366,042-6
16 Oct 2026, 04:316,048-7
13 Oct 2026, 12:166,055-13
7 Oct 2026, 21:176,068-17
1 Oct 2026, 07:376,085-37
16 Sept 2026, 04:366,122-1
12 Sept 2026, 02:376,123-10
8 Sept 2026, 01:186,133-11
3 Sept 2026, 07:066,144-3
31 Aug 2026, 07:496,147-2
28 Aug 2026, 16:576,149-3
26 Aug 2026, 02:056,152-8
23 Aug 2026, 03:446,160-6
19 Aug 2026, 11:346,166first reading

Engagement

42 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
14.0%
avg views ÷ 5,990 subscribers
Avg views / post
836
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.343%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 42 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held42 (20 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total16,713
Reactions total35
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken5 Nov 2026, 02:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 29 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2629.9%
🤡2528.7%
🤣1416.1%
🔥1213.8%
🗿78.05%
👎33.45%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 42 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 42 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 9 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (45.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 07:17 UTC570 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🇰🇵 Северная Корея заявила, что не причастна к взлому Binance на $6.3 млрд. Заявление от имени Ким Ё Чжон, сестры лидера КНДР Ким Чен Ына, распространило государственное агентство KCNA – источник Обвинения США она назвала «абсурдной риторикой», «грубой политической провокацией» и «выдумкой», добавив, что КНДР выступает против любых злонамеренных действий в киберпространстве.

🔥1

3 Nov 2026, 07:13 UTC533 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💼 Главные котировки на 3 ноября 2026 года

👍1

2 Nov 2026, 06:57 UTC665 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 Binance возобновила выводы: за 9.5 часа клиенты вывели $4.65 млрд, чистый отток $3.64 млрд – X

2 Nov 2026, 06:50 UTC638 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💼 Главные котировки на 2 ноября 2026 года

👍1

30 Oct 2026, 08:33 UTC≈1,090 views9 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 Хакер Binance случайно заблокировал более $3 млн в альткоинах, отправив их на адрес контракта Newton Protocol. В контракте нет функции вывода чужих токенов и возможности обновления — вернуть средства не получится.

👍5🤡4

30 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC≈1,240 views3 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 Украденные средства из Binance на $6.3 млрд и взлома Bitget на $388 млн были смешаны на одном адресе 45 минут назад, после прибытия через THORChain. Это указывает на то, что, вероятно, один и тот же субъект стоит за обоими инцидентами. Взлом Bitget был приписан TraiderTraitor, связанному с КНДР, который имел пересечения с другими предыдущими взломами, такими как Kelp DAO – Х

👍3

30 Oct 2026, 07:01 UTC920 views2 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 Binance взломали ключами горячих кошельков, а не через уязвимость контракта – источник У атакующего были копии приватных ключей, и 11 горячих кошельков Binance на четырех сетях сами подписали переводы на адрес, созданный за несколько минут до этого. Минимум $5.5 млрд украдено, по подсчетам Blockaid, взлом еще продолжался на момент публикации. Это расходится с заявлением Binance, что следов утечки ключей нет и при…

🔥2

30 Oct 2026, 06:55 UTC753 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💼 Главные котировки на 30 октября 2026 года

29 Oct 2026, 20:42 UTC959 views11 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 Крупнейшая биржа Binance взломана Кошельки зафиксировали отток средств на $2.77 млрд по пяти различным блокчейнам

🤣11

29 Oct 2026, 08:57 UTC816 views1 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

💼 Главные котировки на 29 октября 2026 года

👍1

28 Oct 2026, 07:23 UTC783 viewsread 5 November 2026
Photo

🏠 У Coinbase произошла утечка контактных данных части клиентов. Компания заявляет, что взломали аналитический сервис Amplitude, средства клиентов не пострадали – Х

Showing the 12 most recent of 42 posts we hold for @fomopress. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Крипто сливы
@otdyshiprocrypto · 22,437
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“FOMO.press” (@fomopress), 5,990 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/fomopress.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.