Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Горелкин

Channel

Горелкин

@webstrangler

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry

29,044subscribers

+1,055 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001471706265
TypeChannel
Username@webstrangler
DescriptionПервый заместитель председателя ИТ-комитета Госдумы, председатель правления РОЦИТ Для официальных обращений – [email protected] По остальным вопросам пишите в бот обратной связи https://max.ru/id7705107429_bot
Created27 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 October 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/webstrangler

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Душитель интернета” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

27,98929,04428,516.55 August 2026 — 27,989 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,989 subscribers6 August 2026 — 27,992 subscribers7 August 2026 — 28,032 subscribers8 August 2026 — 28,054 subscribers9 August 2026 — 28,081 subscribers10 August 2026 — 28,110 subscribers11 August 2026 — 28,129 subscribers12 August 2026 — 28,161 subscribers13 August 2026 — 28,185 subscribers16 August 2026 — 28,182 subscribers17 August 2026 — 28,181 subscribers18 August 2026 — 28,177 subscribers19 August 2026 — 28,174 subscribers20 August 2026 — 28,170 subscribers21 August 2026 — 28,169 subscribers23 August 2026 — 28,167 subscribers25 August 2026 — 28,186 subscribers26 August 2026 — 28,215 subscribers27 August 2026 — 28,239 subscribers28 August 2026 — 28,263 subscribers29 August 2026 — 28,293 subscribers30 August 2026 — 28,318 subscribers31 August 2026 — 28,346 subscribers1 September 2026 — 28,371 subscribers2 September 2026 — 28,393 subscribers3 September 2026 — 28,421 subscribers4 September 2026 — 28,471 subscribers11 September 2026 — 28,488 subscribers13 September 2026 — 28,538 subscribers14 September 2026 — 28,564 subscribers16 September 2026 — 28,613 subscribers18 September 2026 — 28,669 subscribers1 October 2026 — 28,877 subscribers6 October 2026 — 29,044 subscribers5 August 20266 October 2026
35 measurements spanning 62 days, net +1,055. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 27,831–29,202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Oct 2026, 15:3829,044+167
1 Oct 2026, 14:1928,877+208
18 Sept 2026, 11:5828,669+56
16 Sept 2026, 04:1828,613+49
14 Sept 2026, 12:0028,564+26
13 Sept 2026, 00:5628,538+50
11 Sept 2026, 02:1728,488+17
4 Sept 2026, 23:1828,471+50
3 Sept 2026, 09:2828,421+28
2 Sept 2026, 03:0428,393+22
1 Sept 2026, 03:2628,371+25
31 Aug 2026, 05:1128,346+28
30 Aug 2026, 02:1228,318+25
29 Aug 2026, 02:5328,293+30
28 Aug 2026, 00:1228,263+24
27 Aug 2026, 02:5428,239+24
26 Aug 2026, 05:3428,215+29
25 Aug 2026, 02:2828,186+19
23 Aug 2026, 15:0328,167-2
21 Aug 2026, 21:5428,169first reading

Engagement

81 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 89 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
22.4%
avg views ÷ 29,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,500
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.33%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 81 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026
Posts held81 (16 July 2026 – 6 October 2026)
Views total201,430
Reactions total2,674
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Oct 2026, 00:41 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,160
Videos
≈169
Links
≈2,550

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
11m 27s
Average length
2m 17s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,675 reactions across 79 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥6,675100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 81 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,849 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 81 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 6 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Oct 2026, 15:19 UTC≈4,780 views72 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Wikimedia Foundation обвинила OpenAI в несанкционированной активности принадлежащих ей ИИ-агентов. В заявлении утверждается, что ИИ-агенты вносили правки в Википедию, пытались взломать публичный сервис для заметок и отправили миллионы автоматических запросов, повлиявших на доступность некоторых сервисов фонда. Избежать серьезных проблем удалось лишь благодаря самоотверженности волонтеров-редакторов и дополнительным р…

🔥72

5 Oct 2026, 16:16 UTC≈5,210 views76 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Искусственный интеллект замахнулся на великую русскую литературу: GigaChat написал продолжение поэмы Николая Гоголя «Мертвые души». Для этого специалисты «Сбера» специально дообучили нейросеть на собрании сочинений писателя, его черновиках и письмах. В посвященных изданию книги пресс-релизах вся эта затея позиционируется как «исследовательская и просветительская задача», «дань уважения к автору», «попытка заново откр…

🔥76

5 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC≈5,210 views88 reactionsread 7 October 2026

В этом году, по прогнозам, независимая интернет-торговля в России вырастет почти на 26%, а её доля впервые за несколько лет снова пойдёт вверх. Продавцы, которые ещё недавно массово уходили на маркетплейсы, понемногу возвращаются к собственным магазинам и прямым продажам. На этом фоне особенно забавно выглядит популярная теория, будто государству выгодно собрать всю розницу на нескольких огромных платформах: мол, с …

🔥88

4 Oct 2026, 08:42 UTC≈5,120 views86 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Forwarded from @ru_rocit

Самые важные посты из Telegram-каналов экспертов РОЦИТ на этой неделе ▪️Антон Горелкин @webstrangler Вижу, как в соцсетях и технопабликах начали упражняться в остроумии по поводу новости о первом отечественном литографе на 130 нм. Шутки шутками, но давайте снимем розовые потребительские очки и посмотрим, как на самом деле устроена мировая микроэлектроника. Когда вы в следующий раз приложите карту «Мир» к терминалу и…

🔥86

2 Oct 2026, 15:41 UTC≈5,240 views84 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Роботы не заменят людей как минимум еще полвека, уверены в Anthropic. В компании посчитали, что автоматизация 90% физического труда займет более 50 лет – даже если роботов будут внедрять в ускоренном режиме. Да, уже сегодня андроиды способны выполнять примерно 74% человеческих задач в самых разных отраслях, но обходятся дешевле человека лишь в 0,3% случаев. Это профессии, связанные с перемещением объектов, повторяющи…

🔥84

2 Oct 2026, 13:17 UTC≈5,090 views84 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Forwarded from @ru_rocitPhoto

Совместное исследование РОЦИТ и RWB: покупатели предпочитают российские товары РОЦИТ и сервис «RWB Исследования» изучили, как покупатели выбирают между товарами российских и китайских продавцов на маркетплейсе. Исследование показало: китайское предложение чаще дополняет российское в тех категориях, где нужных товаров пока не хватает. Что влияет на выбор, какие преимущества покупатели видят у российских продавцов и …

🔥84

2 Oct 2026, 12:06 UTC≈5,270 views82 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Не так давно я уже писал о том, как ИИ-агенты вырываются из «песочниц» и начинают жить своей жизнью. Недавняя история с OpenAI получила масштабное (и тревожное) продолжение. Что вскрылось к этой минуте: 1️⃣ География «разведки боем». Агенты отметились атаками на инфраструктуру министерств и ведомств в США, Австралии и Канаде — всего более 100 организаций. Судя по всему, агенты взламывали защиту просто потому, что оп…

🔥82

1 Oct 2026, 15:35 UTC≈5,380 views88 reactionsread 7 October 2026

В «Яндексе» придумали, как улучшить рекомендательные алгоритмы. Конечно же, не обошлось без искусственного интеллекта. Новая нейросеть получила название Sona, и она полностью меняет подход к формированию рекомендаций. Если раньше приходилось использовать целые каскады алгоритмов и вручную подбирать признаки для оценки работы каждого из них, теперь эта рутина упакована в ИИ-модель, которая делает всё то же самое, но в…

🔥88

1 Oct 2026, 10:50 UTC≈5,400 views100 reactionsread 7 October 2026

130 нанометров: почему это не «прошлый век», а наш билет в высшую лигу Вижу, как в соцсетях и технопабликах начали упражняться в остроумии по поводу новости о первом отечественном литографе на 130 нм: «пока TSMC делает чипы для iPhone по 3 нм, в России празднуют технологии эпохи Pentium 4». Шутки шутками, но давайте снимем розовые потребительские очки и посмотрим, как на самом деле устроена мировая микроэлектроника…

🔥100

30 Sept 2026, 15:20 UTC≈13,800 views85 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Вслед за первым и вторым «Антифродом» Правительство РФ разработало третий: ранняя версия антимошеннического пакета законопроектов уже обсуждается в профильных медиа. Многие его новеллы были анонсированы еще летом. Например, платформа согласий, которая появится на «Госуслугах» и будет аккумулировать все согласия на обработку персональных данных – в том числе подписанные офлайн. Некоторые эксперты видят здесь риск допо…

🔥85

29 Sept 2026, 16:45 UTC≈5,700 views74 reactionsread 7 October 2026

Знакомьтесь – отечественная игровая консоль от Сбера: телевизионная приставка SberBox Max Gaming с геймпадом и встроенным VK Play для облачного гейминга. Устройство было представлено сегодня на Московском стартап-саммите, его розничная цена составит 13 тысяч рублей. Любопытно, что еще два года назад именно это я и предлагал сделать, а не тратить миллиарды рублей на создание российской альтернативы PlayStation или Xbo…

🔥74

28 Sept 2026, 13:10 UTC≈5,540 views84 reactionsread 7 October 2026
Photo

К каким технологическим рискам пиарщики должны быть готовы в 2026 году? Обсудили этот вопрос с участниками PR-потока «Мастерской новых медиа». Говорили о довольно неочевидных вещах – ведь, например, те же дипфейки уже давно присутствуют в карте рисков современного антикризисного специалиста. А вот, например, кибератаки до сих пор находятся где-то на периферии возможных угроз. Напомнил коллегам, что 12% всех успешных…

🔥84

Showing the 12 most recent of 81 posts we hold for @webstrangler. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@webstrangler edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
19 August 2026
Most recent edit
21 August 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 90 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ИТ-комитет Госдумы
@itduma · 3,647
#1
РОЦИТ: эксперты про интернет
@ru_rocit · 2,194
#2
РБК. Новости. Главное
@rbc_news · 917,345
#3
Токсичная цифра
@toxic_digital · 4,407
#4
Медиастанция
@mediastanciacom · 119,117
#5
⚡️Лобушкин молнит
@lobushkinflash · 70,215
#6
РСпектр: связь, ИТ, кибербезопасность
@rspectr · 3,340
#7
IT News
@IT_today_ru · 3,563
#8
ЗаТелеком 🌐
@zatelecom · 64,306
#9
TMT Channel
@tmtwave · 18,883
#10
Планёрка
@planerka_org · 48,540
#11
МедиаПраво
@mediapravo · 7,232
#12
Radio Tishina
@radio_tishina · 2,549
#13
Mediator
@mediatorlaw · 6,180
#14
Zabelincom
@zabelincom8 · 514
#15
Телеком-ревью
@Telecomreview · 6,730
#16
vc.ru
@vcnews · 112,113
#17
Немкин
@ainemkin · 26,369
#18
Старая площадь
@staraya · 94,013
#19
DigitalRussia
@drussia · 13,878
#20
Литвиненко о технологиях и медиа
@ylitvinenko · 346
#21
Катарсис
@ctrs2018 · 107,518
#22
Медиатехнолог
@mediatech · 147,079
#23
Раньше всех. Ну почти.
@bbbreaking · 1,974,828
#24
Александр Хинштейн
@Hinshtein · 214,806
#25
ЕЖ
@ejdailyru · 669,332
#26
Mash
@mash · 3,108,224
#27
Baza
@bazabazon · 1,563,885
#28
ТАСС
@tass_agency · 568,800
#29
Точка роста
@TochkaUP · 231,962
#30
Деловой подход
@Businesslikes · 203,128
#31
Банкста
@banksta · 438,494
#32
Кровавая барыня
@bloodysx · 1,178,189
#33
Коммерсантъ
@kommersant · 294,260
#34
Readovka
@readovkanews · 2,008,496
#35
Звучит продажно
@prodano5 · 73,035
#36
Минцифры России
@mintsifry · 234,419
#37
RTVI
@rtvimain · 155,585
#38
Пул N3
@dimsmirnov175 · 332,292
#39
БП онлайн
@bponline · 111,251
#40
Жирные коты
@FatCat18 · 105,189
#41
Беспощадный пиарщик
@prbezposhady · 151,489
#42
ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,745
#43
ВЕДОМОСТИ
@vedomosti · 86,502
#44
НЕЗЫГАРЬ
@russicaru · 424,270
#45
Правительство России
@government_rus · 167,768
#46
Сергей Миронов
@mironovonline · 125,070
#47
Грустный Киберпанк
@korolevsnotes · 6,383
#48
Бойлерная
@boilerroomchannel · 223,332
#49
РоскомнадZор
@rkn_tg · 63,177
#50
Нецифровая экономика
@antidigital · 24,364
#51
Код.ру
@d_code · 405,436
#52
Кремль. Новости
@news_kremlin · 281,625
#53
Moscow Digest
@MoscowDigest · 152,481
#54
Антиглянец
@sncmag · 301,539
#55
Эксперт по Госдуме/Склянчук Павел
@expertgd · 13,878
#56
Тина Канделаки
@tikandelaki · 308,796
#57
The Bell
@thebell_io · 105,205
#58
вот это Бизнес
@votBusiness · 120,093
#59
Однажды в МСК
@onceuponmoscow · 131,586
#60
Непроебизнес
@neproebusiness · 131,113
#61
42 секунды
@ftsec · 19,359
#62
Forbes Russia
@forbesrussia · 235,691
#63
Аналитический центр RPPA
@Persdata · 7,797
#64
Кристина Потупчик
@krispotupchik · 151,522
#65
Рекламное право
@advertising_law_channel · 11,767
#66
Цифровая экономика
@DataEconomyRU · 7,457
#67
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,899
#68
КЛИШАС
@andreyklishas · 17,876
#69
Денис Лукаш | Privacy Expert
@privacyexpert · 13,441
#70
Ярослав Нилов
@nilov_official · 8,073
#71
Блогомания
@blogomaniatg · 84,426
#72
Бизнес Проект
@BusinesProjects · 170,718
#73
Финансовый инстинкт
@Finance_Instinct · 120,398
#74
Телекоммуналка
@telecommunal · 43,374
#75
Правительство РФ. Коротко
@gov_korotko · 28,634
#76
PlugoNews
@plugonews · 1,199
#77
Пост Лукацкого
@alukatsky · 37,955
#78
Русский маркетинг
@smmrus · 125,193
#79
Не туда
@netudasmm · 41,384
#80
Лобушкин
@lobushkin · 100,283
#81
Цифровое право
@digital_law_trends · 13,463
#82
Интерфакс
@interfaxonline · 52,585
#83
RIA_Kremlinpool
@RIAKremlinpool · 68,552
#84
Банк России
@centralbank_russia · 244,269
#85
Анатолий АКСАКОВ
@Aksakov_online · 2,624
#86
Василий Пискарев
@vasilii_piskarev · 1,513
#87
Медиафобия
@mediaphobia · 858
#88
Легкий подъем
@EazyUP · 199,768
#89
Политджойстик / Politjoystic ™
@politjoystic · 250,741
#90
Мертвая хватка
@DeadHold · 147,946
#91
Финансы без романсов
@FBR_channel · 147,955
#92
Business Advisor
@BusinesAdvisor · 163,469
#93
Фаундер | Бизнес и стартапы
@Founder_Startup · 148,082
#94
РБК Крипто
@RBCCrypto · 132,083
#95

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 9 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Немкин
@ainemkin · 26,369
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 7 September 2026
ФАС России | FAS Russia
@fasrussia · 33,745
Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 4 September 2026
РоскомнадZор
@rkn_tg · 63,177
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Москва 2030
@msk2O30 · 32,227
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 5 September 2026
Яна Лантратова
@lantratovaDOBRO · 226,712
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
Солодовников. Кратко
@solodovnikovia · 180,101
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Александр Хинштейн
@Hinshtein · 214,806
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 August 2026
Сергей Миронов
@mironovonline · 125,070
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 13 August 2026
Владимир Гутенев
@gutenev_vv · 43,770
Telegram ranks this channel #83 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 September 2026
Privacy Advocates
@prv_adv · 21,899
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
Business Storm
@brainsstorming · 62,823
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Татьяна Буцкая
@TatianaButskaya · 23,482
Telegram ranks this channel #96 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cross-platform identity — Wikidata

A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.

Q48954514 on Wikidata, read 4 October 2026
LabelAnton Gorelkin
DescriptionRussian politician
YouTubeUCGhgUEoNQds6JkNk3L5P1ng
Official sitehttps://горелкин.онлайн/

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Горелкин” (@webstrangler), 29,044 subscribers as measured 6 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/webstrangler.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.