Channel
@prodano5
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
73,120subscribers
-203 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001217850374 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prodano5 |
| Description | Честно и ёмко про ритейл, маркетплейсы и e-commerce. Заказать размещение: midasm.ru Узнать свободные даты: @midas_Diana |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prodano5 |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear word for word on 2 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @prodano5/4804 · this entry24 Feb 2026, 08:45 UTC | @neproebusiness/372824 Feb 2026, 08:45 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @prodano5/4806 · this entry27 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC | @neproebusiness/373027 Feb 2026, 09:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @prodano5/4808 · this entry1 Mar 2026, 09:18 UTC | @neproebusiness/37321 Mar 2026, 09:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @prodano5/4809 · this entry2 Mar 2026, 08:33 UTC | @neproebusiness/37332 Mar 2026, 08:34 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @prodano5/4810 · this entry5 Mar 2026, 08:26 UTC | @neproebusiness/37345 Mar 2026, 08:26 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @neproebusiness/37369 Mar 2026, 08:35 UTC | @prodano5/4812 · this entry9 Mar 2026, 08:35 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @neproebusiness | 10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (9–1) |
| @hotabask | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | @hotabask (7–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 8 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 20 comparable posts for this entry, running 20 February 2026 to 17 March 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Across the whole group of 3, the earliest publisher we hold is @hotabask. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 73,120 | -11 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 73,131 | -2 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 73,133 | -13 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 00:58 | 73,146 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 19:16 | 73,151 | -9 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:38 | 73,160 | -10 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:17 | 73,170 | -5 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 73,175 | -4 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:32 | 73,179 | -7 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 12:04 | 73,186 | -15 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:27 | 73,201 | -4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 12:55 | 73,205 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:37 | 73,204 | -3 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:43 | 73,207 | -6 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 07:02 | 73,213 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 73,220 | -3 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 01:33 | 73,223 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 73,224 | -10 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:47 | 73,234 | -6 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 03:08 | 73,240 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 20 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 91 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 20 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Сеть дискаунтеров «Светофор» за 2025 год сократила 315 розничных точек — 11,6% от общего количества магазинов сети, пишут «Ведомости». Если в начале прошлого года сеть насчитывала 2720 объектов, то к концу — лишь 2405. Эксперты отмечают, что компания уже прошла этап активного роста и теперь концентрируется на оптимизации бизнеса и повышении эффективности оставшихся магазинов. Особенно остро проблемы сети проявились…
В Госдуме предложили сделать ГОСТы для пищевых продуктов обязательными в России, сообщают «Известия». На данный момент чуть ли не каждый второй производитель пишет на этикетках большими буквами «ГОСТ» а мелкими, которые еще поискать на упаковке нужно, — сделано по ТУ, считает депутат Юрий Афонин. По его словам, кроме того, ГОСТам свойственно часто обновляться, а сами они сегодня носят рекомендательный характер, то …
Wildberries подала в Роспатент заявку на регистрацию товарного знака «WB Taxi». Ожидается, что сервис могут запустить на российском рынке в ближайшее время. На данный момент компания уже провела тестирование сервиса в Беларуси и Узбекистане.
Жительница Кургана отсудила у сети алкомаркетов «Красное и Белое» 900 тысяч рублей за травму, полученную в одном из магазинов. Она упала на крыльце магазина и сломала плечо, наступив в петлю из веревки, которой фиксировали дверь при разгрузке. Суд первой инстанции взыскал 400 тысяч с владельца здания, но апелляция пересмотрела решение. Виновной признали федеральную сеть, а не арендодателя — соседний магазин доказал…
Темщики начинают подводить итоги своих попыток заработать на цветах в праздники: один из них закупил 5000 тюльпанов, но смог продать всего 3600 штук и ушёл в минус на 1 млн тенге. В пересчёте на рубли мартовская авантюра обошлась парню примерно в -160 тысяч.
ФНС признала беспроцентные автокредиты неправомерной выгодой и теперь требует уплаты НДФЛ 35% с разницы между ставкой по кредиту и 2/3 ключевой ставки ЦБ, пишет Mash. Под удар попали в основном автовладельцы, оформившие в 2024 году льготные автокредиты под 0–0,01% годовых. Покупатели заявляют, что программа продвигалась как почти бесплатная рассрочка, но о потенциальных налогах не предупреждали ни в рекламе, ни в д…
Каждый третий предприниматель в России думает о закрытии или продаже своего малого бизнеса, сообщают «Ведомости» В четвертом квартале 2025 года 39% предприятий работали в режиме «выживания», а 29% владельцев признали, что доходы не покрывают даже прямых расходов. Основные причины — рост фискальной нагрузки, слишком высокая ключевая ставка и рост неплатежей контрагентов.
Ничего удивительного — просто перед 8 Марта на сайтах объявлений в Москве появились букеты стоимостью от 500 тысяч до 1 миллиона рублей.
Dior планирует возобновить работу флагманских магазинов в Москве — они могут снова открыться с 1 января 2028 года, сообщает «Ъ». До ухода с российского рынка они приносил Dior более 8 млрд рублей годовой выручки. Чистая прибыль компании составляла около 1,3 млрд рублей.
Импортные товары в РФ могут подорожать на 15–30% в ближайшие два месяца, если кризис на Ближнем Востоке не разрешится, пишут «Известия». В зоне риска — техника Apple, Samsung, Sony, автозапчасти для европейских марок и промышленное оборудование, предупредили эксперты. Причина — коллапс в Ормузском проливе: через него шло от 40 до 60% параллельного импорта. Судовладельцы перенаправляют грузы в обход, что удлиняет ма…
Цветы к 8 Марта подорожают на целых 11% — букет в среднем будет стоить 3400 рублей, за один цветок будут просить 247 рублей, сообщает «Коммерсантъ». Основные причины — 20% рост закупочных цен на цветы за год, удорожание логистики, тепличного производства. Дороже всего цветы обходятся жителям Якутии, где они стоят в среднем 596 руб. за штуку, что в 2,7 раза превосходит средний показатель по стране. Это может объясня…
В РФ началась обязательная маркировка сладостей — печенья, пряников, мармелада, зефира, пастилы, восточных сладостей, вафель, шоколадных, ореховых и прочих паст в потребительской упаковке, сообщает ТАСС. Кроме этого, маркировка расширилась на биодобавки, которые содержат жиры, масла и их фракции, полученные из рыбы и морских млекопитающих, а также ферменты и прочие органические соединения.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @prodano5. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 125 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Звучит продажно” (@prodano5), 73,120 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prodano5.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.