Channel
5 бизнес подкастов
@Busspod
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
175,470subscribers
-935 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001176550703 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Busspod |
| Created | Between 1 April 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 51 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Busspod |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Oct 2026, 14:01 | 175,470 | -19 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 15:50 | 175,489 | -22 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 18:57 | 175,511 | -28 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:46 | 175,539 | -17 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:01 | 175,556 | -68 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:09 | 175,624 | -26 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 175,650 | +75 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:06 | 175,575 | -12 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 11:28 | 175,587 | -22 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 09:46 | 175,609 | -15 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 08:55 | 175,624 | -18 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 11:17 | 175,642 | -16 |
| 14 Oct 2026, 11:51 | 175,658 | -13 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 02:21 | 175,671 | -61 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:17 | 175,732 | -57 |
| 4 Oct 2026, 07:41 | 175,789 | -89 |
| 25 Sept 2026, 15:00 | 175,878 | -87 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 09:39 | 175,965 | -29 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:20 | 175,994 | -47 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:41 | 176,041 | first reading |
Engagement
No public post preview. We read this entry on 8 August 2026 and Telegram serves no public post stream for it — the channel has previews switched off, or it is a group or bot with no readable feed. Views, reactions and engagement rates cannot be measured from the outside for an entry in this state, so we publish none. Subscriber counts above are unaffected.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@TochkaUP · 230,005#1
@EazyUP · 198,082#2
@FatCat18 · 103,691#3
@DeadHold · 146,632#4
@votBusiness · 118,927#5
@neproebusiness · 129,781#6
@FBR_channel · 146,347#7
@cyber_frontZ · 60,287#8
@nasrat_news · 9,934#9
@DeloPlus · 131,330#10
@dengivezde · 176,183#11
@BusinesProjects · 169,993#12
@BusinessAtmosphere · 122,417#13
@BusinesAdvisor · 162,878#14
@ggreat_of_development · 100,711#15
@belaya_kaska · 85,086#16
@kvadratnymaster · 50,428#17
@DoRealCash · 47,180#18
@letmotiva · 29,194#19
@podkasty24 · 187,285#20
@business_podcast · 172,013#21
@Businesslikes · 201,556#22
@prodano5 · 72,600#23
@rtvimain · 164,439#24
@cyberfreek · 83,848#25
@tikandelaki · 300,427#26
@boilerroomchannel · 218,587#27
@mediastanciacom · 118,830#28
@emphasises · 26,046#29
@staraya · 93,816#30
@MoscowDigest · 151,104#31
@postnewsru · 41,866#32
@bye_biden · 89,073#33
@lomovkaa · 333,853#34
@krispotupchik · 151,386#35
@zvezdach_mag · 50,609#36
@thegraschenkov · 163,726#37
@banksecret · 57,247#38
@FingersON · 99,857#39
@onceuponmoscow · 130,219#40
@gosplandcookies · 52,811#41
@berdovaalena · 144,510#42
@dauotkysit · 270,463#43
@cool_construction · 62,517#44
@badphrase · 52,113#45
@bpz_ukraine · 89,408#46
@planerka_org · 49,415#47
@RepostUZ · 90,830#48
@blogomaniatg · 84,427#49
@Finance_Instinct · 119,587#50
@boulevard_ring · 71,636#51
@stone_developer · 121,140#52
@goodphrase · 36,732#53
@NewNovorossia · 55,873#54
@uraldailyPeZerV · 12,539#55
@BankingTruth · 32,056#56
@mironovonline · 124,445#57
@MolniaChannel · 49,690#58
@Founder_Startup · 147,331#59
@VoprosFin · 98,539#60
@showbiz_live24 · 64,799#61
@analyst_on_the_couch · 61,898#62
@moscowlenta · 70,054#63
@moscow_on_air · 71,238#64
@merussiatg · 49,872#65
@developers_policy · 44,743#66
@mediatech · 105,027#67
@ctrs2018 · 106,376#68
@mgd_unofficial · 16,108#69
@koshelevvladimir · 34,492#70
@NOPpolicy · 42,122#71
@BBDiploma · 77,097#72
@BasicMoscow · 55,119#73
@informburo_sfd · 25,470#74
@internetsmi · 55,967#75
@EconomistSign · 99,983#76
@regpol · 63,806#77
@LastOfRus · 64,003#78
@akolesnik39 · 10,059#79
@brainsstorming · 62,554#80
@znach_li_ty · 14,495#81
@npodgornov · 13,215#82
@ProDellki · 15,485 (as read 12 August 2026)#83
@fineconomics · 42,361#84
@polit_rus · 9,812#85
@znaech_li_ty_msk · 13,471#86
@rlz_the_kraken · 516,228#87
@meters2 · 77,880#88
@stranavvvv · 56,963#89
@vybora · 41,976#90
@NeRestorani · 141,222#91
@georgia_24 · 7,564#92
@zhurbaks · 14,087#93
@kursk_nasv · 41,382#94
@scientificrussia · 41,759#95
@pioneergroupofcompanies · 128,986#96
@nova24uz · 35,376#97
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@LeveINext · 18,965
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 October 2026
@DeadHold · 146,632
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@business_podcast · 172,013
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
@dengivezde · 176,183
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@Pro_FinGram · 47,700
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@FBR_channel · 146,347
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@BusinesAdvisor · 162,878
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@BusinesProjects · 169,993
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 12 August 2026
@podkasty24 · 187,285
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 11 August 2026
@EazyUP · 198,082
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
@bussiness_podcast · 21,629
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 23 September 2026
@DoRealCash · 47,180
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@gain_business · 175,917
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 12 August 2026
@bussideas · 222,656
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
@Wild_Top · 21,444
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 September 2026
@BusinessAtmosphere · 122,417
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@master_businessa · 128,823
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
@rich1_dad1 · 24,449
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 15 September 2026
@letmotiva · 29,194
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@silaslovv · 110,104
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 14 August 2026
@Business_University · 172,775
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 12 August 2026
@votBusiness · 118,927
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026
@DeloPlus · 131,330
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@neproebusiness · 129,781
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 75 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“5 бизнес подкастов” (@Busspod), 175,470 subscribers as measured 26 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Busspod.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.