Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Бродячий налоговик

Channel

Бродячий налоговик

@tax_nomad

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

188subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001927560497
TypeChannel
Username@tax_nomad
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/tax_nomad

Growth

175188181.56 August 2026 — 175 subscribers8 August 2026 — 175 subscribers13 August 2026 — 177 subscribers21 August 2026 — 183 subscribers28 August 2026 — 185 subscribers4 September 2026 — 186 subscribers12 September 2026 — 188 subscribers6 August 202612 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 37 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 173–190 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 01:19188+2
4 Sept 2026, 04:00186+1
28 Aug 2026, 10:34185+2
21 Aug 2026, 04:18183+6
13 Aug 2026, 11:35177+2
8 Aug 2026, 14:01175no change
6 Aug 2026, 02:02175first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 27 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

72 reactions across 17 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2331.9%
1825.0%
🤯811.1%
😁79.72%
🙏45.56%
💯22.78%
😱22.78%
🤣22.78%
11.39%
11.39%
👌11.39%
👏11.39%
🔥11.39%
🤮11.39%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 72 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC62 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На следующей неделе - большой разбор новых законов о регулировании крипты https://t.me/lidingslawfirm/1482

👍5

4 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC54 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вижу много заголовков "Подписан закон о легализации криптовалюты", причём не первый раз, пару лет назад так же писали про майнинг. Это в корне неверно и дезинформирует читателей - создаётся впечатление, что раньше криптовалюта была запрещена, а сейчас её наконец-то разрешили. Криптовалюта в России никогда не была запрещена, как и её майнинг - она была или не урегулирована (как шесть лет назад) или была разрешена с н

3💯2

4 Aug 2026, 14:20 UTC58 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️ Сегодня Президент подписал законы о регулировании крипторынка. Теперь вместо законов № 259-ФЗ будут № 282-ФЗ (основной) и № 283-ФЗ (сателлитный).

👍21🙏1

24 Jul 2026, 13:00 UTC88 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @lidingslawfirmPhoto

📣 Верховный суд рассмотрит вопросы добросовестности заемщиков и установления фактов при взыскании таможенных платежей На этой неделе Верховный суд рассмотрит ряд значимых споров. В одном из них суду предстоит решить, можно ли полностью освободить от долгов заемщика, который за три дня получил кредиты в четырех банках, завысив сведения о своем доходе. В другом — определить, обязан ли гражданин уплачивать таможенные п

5

23 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC88 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @retraPhoto

Произошло, пожалуй, самое громкое событие в мире искусственного интеллекта за последнее время. Текста будет много, но оно того стоит. На этой неделе был взломан Hugging Face — одна из важнейших платформ в мире ИИ. Проще говоря, это GitHub для нейросетей, датасетов и инструментов машинного обучения, которым пользуется практически вся индустрия. Казалось бы, обычная кибератака и ничего особенного. Но есть один нюанс:

🤯6😱21👌1🤣1

23 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC79 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Минутка цифровизации. Я слышал про этот инцидент, но здесь хорошее описание.

👏1

21 Jul 2026, 11:29 UTC99 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

⚡️⚡️⚡️Госдума только что приняла законы о регулировании крипторынка - и основной, и сателлитный.

5

16 Jul 2026, 15:00 UTC207 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Началось движение в карточке законопроекта о реформе крипторынка: https://sozd.duma.gov.ru/bill/1194918-8 Выложен официальный текст к второму чтению (теперь можно 😊). Особое внимание вызывают те самые таблицы поправок - как к принятию, так и к отклонению. Второе чтение ожидается 21 июля.

👍21

15 Jul 2026, 15:30 UTC135 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

У зеркала этого канала в Максе появился нормальный адрес: https://max.ru/channel_tax_nomad

🤮1

26 Jun 2026, 11:06 UTC177 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Ожидаются довольно оптимистичные новости для "домашних" майнеров🤞. Как говорится, не переключайтесь.

😁5

26 Jun 2026, 09:54 UTC268 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

На сессии ПМЮФ по DAO: https://legalforum.info/programme/business-programme/10289/ интересная позиция от Дениса Кузьмичёва, отвечающего за регистрацию и учёт налогоплательщиков в ЦА ФНС: - российские налоговые органы готовы регистрировать DAO как только для этого появятся основания - регулировать DAO можно и нужно, но не через концепцию простого товарищества, а как адаптированные и упрощённые юридические лица - дл

👍3😁2🤣1🙏1

26 Jun 2026, 09:35 UTC248 viewsread 8 August 2026

Банк России вчера выложил второй доклад по стейблкойнам: https://www.cbr.ru/Content/Document/File/193894/Consultation_Paper_25062026_52.pdf Довольно конструктивная риторика: - в России понятия стейблкойнов нет (и, похоже, не будет), но закон не запрещает создавать ЦФА с признаками стейблкойнов. - стейблкойны на базе ЦФА уже сейчас могут создаваться и использоваться для инвестиций и трансграничных расчётов - стейб

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @tax_nomad. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Бродячий налоговик” (@tax_nomad), 188 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tax_nomad.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.