Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
36 measurements spanning 45 days, net -1,955. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 69,550–72,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 36
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 16:59
69,843
-101
17 Sept 2026, 02:00
69,944
-88
14 Sept 2026, 23:36
70,032
-95
13 Sept 2026, 09:39
70,127
-106
11 Sept 2026, 14:01
70,233
-85
8 Sept 2026, 21:37
70,318
-142
5 Sept 2026, 15:16
70,460
-104
3 Sept 2026, 14:37
70,564
-57
2 Sept 2026, 07:15
70,621
-51
1 Sept 2026, 04:37
70,672
-37
31 Aug 2026, 08:05
70,709
-49
30 Aug 2026, 10:37
70,758
-33
29 Aug 2026, 12:58
70,791
-40
28 Aug 2026, 14:37
70,831
-29
27 Aug 2026, 12:16
70,860
-23
26 Aug 2026, 12:15
70,883
-80
25 Aug 2026, 12:42
70,963
+4
24 Aug 2026, 14:48
70,959
-90
22 Aug 2026, 23:07
71,049
-59
21 Aug 2026, 11:45
71,108
first reading
Engagement
56 posts held, back to 9 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.11%
avg views ÷ 69,843 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,170
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 56 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 21 September 2026
Posts held
56 (9 July 2026 – 21 September 2026)
Views total
43,458
Reactions total
675
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Sept 2026, 01:14 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,840
Videos
≈104
Links
≈2,360
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
20s
Average length
20s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,926 reactions across 55 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👎
532
27.6%
🤡
461
23.9%
👍
359
18.6%
🌚
155
8.05%
❤
150
7.79%
🔥
145
7.53%
😁
55
2.86%
😎
28
1.45%
🐳
10
0.519%
😢
9
0.467%
🎉
5
0.26%
❤🔥
4
0.208%
⚡
3
0.156%
🗿
3
0.156%
🦄
3
0.156%
☃
2
0.104%
🍾
1
0.052%
👌
1
0.052%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,935 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 21 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚀 Биткоин снова пампится
BTC торгуется около $84 700 и уже прибавил примерно 4,5% на дневной свече.
Теперь главный вопрос: это продолжение большого роста или ещё один памп перед откатом.
Куда пойдёт биткоин дальше?
🔥 — рост продолжится уже на этой неделе
👍 — это начало долгого буллрана
👎 — скоро будет откат
@easymarketcrypto
🇷🇺 Центробанк РФ готовит российский стейблкоин
Минфин и Банк России начали прорабатывать рублёвый стейблкоин. Обсуждают, как он будет работать и какие операции разрешат.
Зачем он нужен, если уже есть цифровой рубль?
Цифровой рубль выпускает сам ЦБ. За стейблкоином обычно стоит отдельная организация, которая обеспечивает токен реальными рублями и обязуется обменивать его один к одному.
Такой актив можно было бы ис…
📈 Альты проснулись?
Пока Bitcoin вернулся к $80 000, деньги заметно быстрее пошли в альты. За сутки UNI вырос на 26%, NEAR — на 30%, APT — на 18%, HYPE — на 11%, SOL — на 6%. Ни одна из 40 крупнейших ликвидных монет не оказалась в минусе.
Лучше всех выглядит DeFi-сектор: он прибавил около 6,8%. Рынок выдохнул после решения ФРС, а разрешение SEC тестировать токенизированные акции добавило интереса к ончейн-проектам.…
🇷🇺 Мосбиржа запустит торги криптовалютой в «квазидолларах»
Московская биржа готовится запустить организованные торги криптовалютой. Технически площадка обещает быть готова к 1 декабря — останется дождаться нормативных актов ЦБ.
Что это вообще такое?
Настоящих долларов на Мосбирже нет с июня 2024 года из-за санкций. Поэтому площадка использует беспоставочные инструменты: они повторяют курс доллара, но саму валюту н…
🇺🇸 Сенат США уронил Bitcoin ниже $76 000
Американский Сенат заблокировал продвижение CLARITY Act — закона, который должен был наконец разделить полномочия SEC и CFTC и установить единые правила для крипторынка США. Сам законопроект мы уже разбирали здесь.
Bitcoin во время голосования просел примерно на 1,3% и опустился ниже $76 000. За сутки падение доходило почти до 4%.
Здесь важный нюанс: сенаторы не голосовали …
🇷🇺 ЦБ признал крипту риском для России
Банк России официально включил криптовалюты и стейблкоины в список рисков для финансового рынка на 2027–2029 годы.
Регулятор считает, что крипта может вытеснять рубль из расчётов, использоваться в незаконных схемах и уводить рынок в тень. Отдельно ЦБ предупреждает о риске полной потери вложенных денег.
Что это значит для владельцев крипты?
Само хранение криптовалют запрещать…
🇺🇸 Трамп согласился ограничить криптобизнес политиков
Республиканцы опубликовали финальную версию CLARITY Act. Это большой законопроект о правилах крипторынка США: кто и как будет контролировать токены, биржи, брокеров и другие криптосервисы.
Ради его прохождения Трамп согласился ограничить криптобизнес политиков, включая собственный.
Краткое содержание предыдущих серий:
🟠Трамп заработал на крипте $1,4 млрд за го…
🇷🇺 Россияне открыли 87 000 счетов для цифрового рубля за десять дней
С момента массового запуска 1 сентября пользователи открыли 87 000 счетов цифрового рубля и провели более 50 000 операций, рассказала Эльвира Набиуллина.
Цифры пока выглядят двояко. С одной стороны, это около 8700 новых счетов ежедневно. С другой — на каждый открытый счет приходится в среднем лишь 0,57 операции. Открыть попробовали, а пользоваться…
🇷🇺 Налоговая увидит, с какого телефона вы платили цифровым рублём
ФНС получит доступ к данным устройств, с которых россияне проводят операции в цифровых рублях. Три августовских приказа ведомства, срок: не раньше 1 июля 2027 года.
📋 Что окажется в выписке
• IP-адрес и MAC-адрес устройства
• Номер телефона и SIM-карты
• Другие идентификаторы гаджета
• Сумма, время, назначение платежа, кто отправил и кто получил
Ф…
📉 Альткоины упали на 58% за год
Glassnode посчитал, что стало с монетами из топ-200 после максимума биткоина в октябре 2025.
Если коротко: упало почти всё, и если у вас в портфеле не биткоин, ваш портфель сложился больше, чем в 2 раза.
Средние изменения цен от того самого октябрьского пика:
🟠Медиана падения по альткоинам из топ-200: падение на 58%. Медиана означает середину: то есть половина монет из списка упала…
🏴 Британец смог вернуть доступ к потерянным 61 $BTC через 12 лет
Британец по имени Крис восстановил доступ к 61 $BTC, которые считал потерянными после закрытия ранней криптобиржи Intersango. Сейчас монеты оценивают примерно в $4,5 млн.
В 2011-м он вложил около £1 500. Когда биржа начала разваливаться, на её счетах у него было уже 61 $BTC, но вывести их не удалось. Площадку ликвидировали, сайт исчез, а письма …
📞 Сбер требует добить криптообменники
Первый зампред Сбера назвал крипту «ахиллесовой пятой» в борьбе с мошенниками и призвал «системно и беспощадно бить» по каналам вывода денег.
По оценке банка, через обменники за год из России утекло 300 млрд похищенных рублей.
❌ Что случилось
Спустя сутки после вступления в силу закона 282-ФЗ (того самого, о цифровых валютах) банки начали блокировать операции иностранных крип…
👍13👎11🤡3❤1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @easymarketcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@easymarketcrypto edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Polls
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 9 July 2026 to 21 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Mentions
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 20 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Web3 на доступном @nft_reality · 78,349 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 19 August 2026
Витрина криптовалют @crypto_showcase · 47,957 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 26 August 2026
NEURO CRYPTO | Нейрокрипто @RedList_NFT · 26,519 Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Крипта на доступном” (@easymarketcrypto), 69,843 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/easymarketcrypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.