Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Глеб Шатерник | Vectrum

Channel

Глеб Шатерник | Vectrum

@vectrumcrypto

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

18,968subscribers

-809 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001216689777
TypeChannel
Username@vectrumcrypto
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held58
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/vectrumcrypto

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

18,96319,77719,3706 August 2026 — 19,777 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,772 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,770 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,767 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,764 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,756 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,750 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,745 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,737 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,725 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,706 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,692 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,687 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,678 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,665 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,660 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,651 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,645 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,640 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,638 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,635 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,631 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,627 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,618 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,612 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,596 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,576 subscribers6 September 2026 — 19,567 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,536 subscribers12 September 2026 — 19,519 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,513 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,509 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,471 subscribers25 September 2026 — 19,370 subscribers4 October 2026 — 19,283 subscribers8 October 2026 — 19,210 subscribers13 October 2026 — 19,200 subscribers14 October 2026 — 19,196 subscribers15 October 2026 — 19,185 subscribers16 October 2026 — 19,175 subscribers17 October 2026 — 19,167 subscribers18 October 2026 — 19,159 subscribers19 October 2026 — 19,146 subscribers20 October 2026 — 19,156 subscribers21 October 2026 — 19,183 subscribers22 October 2026 — 19,175 subscribers23 October 2026 — 19,177 subscribers24 October 2026 — 19,165 subscribers25 October 2026 — 19,149 subscribers27 October 2026 — 19,135 subscribers28 October 2026 — 19,130 subscribers29 October 2026 — 19,105 subscribers30 October 2026 — 19,001 subscribers31 October 2026 — 18,970 subscribers1 November 2026 — 18,963 subscribers2 November 2026 — 18,970 subscribers3 November 2026 — 18,967 subscribers4 November 2026 — 18,968 subscribers18,9686 August 20264 November 2026
58 measurements spanning 89 days, net -809. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 18,841–19,899 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 58
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:4518,968+1
3 Nov 2026, 07:0018,967-3
2 Nov 2026, 04:0918,970+7
1 Nov 2026, 03:5918,963-7
31 Oct 2026, 01:4818,970-31
30 Oct 2026, 05:0019,001-104
29 Oct 2026, 03:4919,105-25
28 Oct 2026, 01:5719,130-5
27 Oct 2026, 02:0019,135-14
25 Oct 2026, 23:5619,149-16
24 Oct 2026, 21:4419,165-12
23 Oct 2026, 23:5419,177+2
22 Oct 2026, 20:1819,175-8
21 Oct 2026, 16:4719,183+27
20 Oct 2026, 15:4619,156+10
19 Oct 2026, 14:0819,146-13
18 Oct 2026, 15:5419,159-8
17 Oct 2026, 17:3819,167-8
16 Oct 2026, 15:2619,175-10
15 Oct 2026, 14:0119,185first reading

Engagement

40 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 60 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
11.2%
avg views ÷ 18,968 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,130
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 40 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held40 (11 July 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total38,300
Reactions total928
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 03:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 22s
Average length
47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,826 reactions across 40 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍76441.8%
🔥60433.1%
❤1608.76%
💩643.50%
😁492.68%
🤡462.52%
👌341.86%
💯321.75%
😱261.42%
🤣100.548%
🏆70.383%
💊50.274%
😍50.274%
👎40.219%
🤮30.164%
🤷30.164%
🍌20.11%
🍾20.11%
👨‍💻20.11%
✍10.055%
3 further kinds30.164%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 40 of the 40 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,826 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 40 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Nov 2026, 17:02 UTC≈1,290 views49 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

😱 По рынку стремительно распространяется инфа о том, что пузырь ИИ лопнет и обвалит рынки! Причём многие даже не понимают, что к чему. Решил разобраться: реально ли надулся пузырь и какую угрозу он представляет, может ли он обвалить рынки и какие тут риски для битка и альтов. Что в видео: - почему пузырь надулся и почему может лопнуть - что тогда будет с рынками и с криптой - мои глобальные сценарии по битку на гра…

🔥24👍21👌4

3 Nov 2026, 11:32 UTC≈1,400 views57 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

👍25🔥24❤6👀1💩1

2 Nov 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,640 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

2️⃣ Еще один альт на закуп - #ZEC. И вывод после HYPE По HYPE дал зону глубоко, 76-77. Монета ушла в другую сторону, сейчас 86, и я без неё. Вывод: сильную монету можно ждать на -15% бесконечно. Поэтому по ZEC иначе. Половину беру на текущих, около 1176. Остальное добираю на 1050, это минимумы октября. Почему ZEC: 5 ноября обновление сети, блоки в 3 раза быстрее. Держится лучше рынка, а кит сегодня взял 3к ZEC в с…

👍21🔥15👌3❤2💩2💊1🤡1

2 Nov 2026, 17:16 UTC≈1,640 views50 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Что по сделке #BTC? Пока что все неплохо, биток не валится, а держится в зоне входа. Нефть минус 7% за день, это тоже неплохо для моего лонга. Писал ранее, что главный риск для меня - нефть, а не ФРС. Сегодня она валится на надеждах на сделку США с Ираном. Нефть дешевле - меньше инфляции, у ФРС меньше поводов держать ставку высокой. Стоп по сделке 74740: не удержим 75к - значит ошибся. На 80100 хочу фиксануть част…

👍23🔥17👌3❤2💊2💩2🤡1

30 Oct 2026, 10:49 UTC≈2,270 views78 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Сделка в лонг по #BTC полностью набралась. Ждем отработку. В крайнем случае нет.

🔥27👍22😁15💩4🤡4👌2💊2🤮2

29 Oct 2026, 20:58 UTC≈2,550 views44 reactionsread 4 November 2026

С таким паническим новостным фоном имейте в виду, что можно набрать лонгов и прокатиться на стопах вообще легко. Поэтому мои ближайшие сделки будут консервативными по объему входа.

🔥19👍18👌4💯2💩1

29 Oct 2026, 20:53 UTC≈2,510 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Говорят, что и Binance взломали🤣

🔥14👍13🤣10😱5😁2💩1

29 Oct 2026, 20:51 UTC≈2,520 views45 reactionsread 4 November 2026

#BTC идет в зону закупа 78600-76800! Даже уже падал до 78400 ненадолго. Лимитки расставили?

👍23🔥14❤2💩2💯2😱2

29 Oct 2026, 18:53 UTC≈2,450 views49 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Polymarket взломали🍿

👍19🔥14😱11😁3🍾2

29 Oct 2026, 15:16 UTC≈2,520 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

HYPE уебал в другую сторону от моей желаемой зоны входа😅 Повод: владелец Нью-Йоркской биржи ICE хочет запустить для США фьючерсы через Hyperliquid. До моей сетки 69-59 теперь минус 26% от текущих. Кто ж знал, что такие новости выйдут. На Polymarket вчера 56% ставили, что HYPE в этом году увидит ниже 70, сейчас 31%. Шанс получить мою зону меньше, поэтому план меняю. Догонять рост не буду, в воздухе не беру. После п…

👍23🔥19😁5🤡3👌2💩2🌭1

29 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC≈2,190 views41 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Минус KuCoin. Уже 4-я биржа за 2 недели😅 Писал про Bitget и MEXC, потом ушла HTX, а сегодня KuCoin объявила, что немедленно прекращает обслуживание России и Беларуси. Аккаунтам придут письма со сроками, но не ждите их, закрывайте позы и выводите бабки сейчас. Нужны еще поводы для перехода на BingX? Регайтесь по ссылке: https://bingxdao.com/invite/PGMY7X После регистрации вы можете получить крутые бонусы от меня и …

👍19🔥13👌4😁4❤1

28 Oct 2026, 15:45 UTC≈1,950 views34 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🍿 Запустил стрим по торговле мемкоинов! 👉️️️️️️ https://www.twitch.tv/gleb_shaternik Залетайте, кому интересно!

👍18🔥15🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @vectrumcrypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Diklat.co (Diklat Online Indonesia)
@DiklatDotCo · 50,708
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 27 August 2026
Алексей Руденко | RWA • Crypto
@AlexRich2018 · 43,227
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 28 August 2026
Guru Era Digital
@egurudigital · 77,503
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 27 August 2026
PIFAGOR TRADE
@pifagortrade · 84,547
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 18 August 2026
Сытый хомяк
@wellfedhamster · 87,243
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 17 August 2026
Crypto Falcon
@falconinvestors · 83,025
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Трейдинг в благости - Игорь Павленко
@blagotrading · 68,842
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
Mr Mozart
@mr_mozart · 127,496
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
Дмитрий Кокорев | Инвестиции
@kokorevinvest · 104,953
Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 August 2026
Биржевой Монарх
@BMonarch_official · 43,003
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Илья Соловей
@teamtrade618 · 44,787
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Глеб Шатерник | Vectrum” (@vectrumcrypto), 18,968 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vectrumcrypto.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.