National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 16 days, net +1,215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51,903–53,567 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 22:18
53,375
+83
21 Aug 2026, 08:56
53,292
+262
20 Aug 2026, 16:08
53,030
+321
20 Aug 2026, 05:34
52,709
+39
19 Aug 2026, 15:11
52,670
+55
19 Aug 2026, 06:45
52,615
+169
18 Aug 2026, 11:43
52,446
+4
18 Aug 2026, 10:05
52,442
+158
17 Aug 2026, 12:54
52,284
-1
17 Aug 2026, 11:52
52,285
+15
16 Aug 2026, 02:34
52,270
+8
15 Aug 2026, 20:58
52,262
+122
14 Aug 2026, 16:14
52,140
+45
14 Aug 2026, 09:56
52,095
-6
13 Aug 2026, 10:04
52,101
-12
13 Aug 2026, 03:04
52,113
no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:55
52,113
-4
12 Aug 2026, 01:32
52,117
-7
11 Aug 2026, 08:07
52,124
-4
11 Aug 2026, 02:11
52,128
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 36 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
39.2%
avg views ÷ 53,375 subscribers
Avg views / post
20,900
47 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026
Posts held
48 (28 July 2026 – 22 August 2026)
Views total
983,540
Reactions total
23,696
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
22 Aug 2026, 13:54 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,970
Videos
≈726
Links
≈565
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
14m 26s
Average length
1m 12s
Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
23,696 reactions across 47 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
4,392
18.5%
👍
2,976
12.6%
custom 5256103272296499934
2,640
11.1%
🔥
2,611
11.0%
❤
2,325
9.81%
😁
1,787
7.54%
😱
1,708
7.21%
custom 5251301176737013980
1,215
5.13%
🤯
1,100
4.64%
👏
530
2.24%
custom 5447544503143504937
494
2.08%
🤝
353
1.49%
custom 5375135722514685501
312
1.32%
😢
261
1.10%
💯
243
1.03%
custom 5406913184810409829
222
0.937%
🍾
195
0.823%
custom 5435853786847387527
177
0.747%
😍
66
0.279%
custom 5206601132805212480
46
0.194%
3 further kinds
43
0.181%
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 23,696reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 22 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
320
across the posts below
Posts paid on
34
of 47 we hold a reading for · 72%
Most on one post
56
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @stop_scam. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 22 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Вы спрашиваете: Что там по Домогацкому?
Пару очень мелких новостных сайтов, на днях публиковали текст из постановления возбуждения новой статьи в деле, а именно ст 210 часть 2 (ОПС). Но данные сайты не ссылаются на МВД, либо на какой-либо другой источник.
Следовательно это либо вброс, либо слив. На мой взгляд, судя по тексту — это именно слив.
Если ОПС на Сергея Домогацкого действительно возбудили, то ему грозит о…
Новый поджог от Эрика Гафарова?
Беглый мошенник опубликовал пост и дал ссылку на видео с поджогом автомобиля, в поселке под Казанью, с его слов, племянника президента Татарстана.
Гафаров утверждает, что некий Ленар Марданов должен ему 1 млн $. Ранее Гафаров публиковал у себя в соцсетях фотографию этого человека, отдельные посты о нем сохранены у него в архиве (прилагаю скрины)
Напомню, что на днях по такой же схем…
Суд Ставрополя отпустил поджигателя двух автомобилей под подписку о невыезде.
Моргунов (в прошлом Казаков) сжёг машины предпринимателя Максима Кулагина. Это умышленное уничтожение имущества путём поджога.
Совершено по заказу, который он принял через интернет на специализированном криминальном сайте. После чего снял на видео и отправил заказчику. Не спонтанный хулиганский поджог, а выполнение чужого поручения за ден…
Прямо сейчас начался Стрим/Реакция на новый выпуск про Гафарова и Сухоплюева, от блогера который всегда жестко проходится по гному, залетайте: https://youtu.be/WD7jJN1zBAg
Эрик Гафаров окончательно оторвался от реальности.
После просмотра сегодняшнего выпуска, он продолжает писать Максиму Кулагину (вкладчику пирамиды), в новом сообщении угрожает беспилотником в окно квартиры.
Будем держать вас в курсе, о происходящем не только здесь, но и Максим у себя в запрещённой сети будет рассказыват новости. Поддержите его подпиской.
Мамкин поджигатель радуется новому выпуску. Еще раз подтверждая что устроил новые поджоги Кулагину и несет дичь про «доступы к активам фонда»
Объясните Гафарову, что если у Сухоплюева есть доступ к криптовалюте фонда, к тому самому леджеру который якобы лежал в сейфе (оружейной комнаты) у Миннехузина, то при потере леджера (холодного кошелька) имея на руках пароли, ты его восстановишь в любой точке мира где есть инт…
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @stop_scam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 61,558 of 1,583,249entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
МПЦ - Юридическая сеть @mpcrf · 100,324 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 15 August 2026
Ярдрей - юридический канал @yardrey · 165,382 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Андрей Ковалёв @andreykovalev_russia · 72,816 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
КОВАЛЕНКО СВЯТ @Kovalenkosvyat · 100,100 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 15 August 2026
Амиран Сардаров @amiranyshka · 64,797 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
Вася на сене @vasya_nasene · 130,087 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 21 August 2026
Люди PRO ✪ @People_PRO_main · 69,947 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 August 2026
СЛЕЗЫ САТОШИ @slezisatoshi · 125,062 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
ЖЖГИСЬ @zhzhgiss · 130,391 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Алистаров | Расследования” (@stop_scam), 53,375 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stop_scam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.