🔴😾 SANDUSDT SELL 1780 @ 0.03893

Channel
Binance liquidations
@REKTbinance
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
20,196subscribers
-330 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001310591284 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @REKTbinance |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 6 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/REKTbinance |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 20,196 | -25 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 11:57 | 20,221 | -14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 23:47 | 20,235 | -16 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 23:15 | 20,251 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 20:05 | 20,265 | -10 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:34 | 20,275 | -9 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 20,284 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 23:43 | 20,293 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 02:23 | 20,305 | -14 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 05:52 | 20,319 | -7 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 20,326 | -7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 20,333 | -20 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 20,353 | -22 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:13 | 20,375 | -19 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 02:44 | 20,394 | -12 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 20,406 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 02:24 | 20,410 | -15 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:55 | 20,425 | -18 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:55 | 20,443 | -9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:54 | 20,452 | first reading |
Engagement
1,140 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 57 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.025%
- avg views ÷ 20,196 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5.0
- 860 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 860
- of 1,140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 860 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,140 (6 August 2026 – 3 September 2026) |
| Views total | 4,320 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 00:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
🔴😾 ICPUSDT SELL 335 @ 2.436000
🔴😾 CFGUSDT SELL 2639 @ 0.1022619
🔴😾 PUMPUSDT SELL 100516 @ 0.0040350
🟢😾 ANKRUSDT BUY 11687 @ 0.004584
🟢😾 EGLDUSDT BUY 230.0 @ 4.989
🔴😾 SEIUSDT SELL 20580 @ 0.0488384 🔴😾 APTUSDT SELL 1487.4 @ 0.58151
🔴😾 EGLDUSDT SELL 100.0 @ 4.963
🟢😾 ZHONGJIUSDT BUY 0.12 @ 128.61000
🔴😾 MUBARAKUSDT SELL 1460 @ 0.0280400 🔴😾 XVGUSDT SELL 12068 @ 0.0026610 🟢😾 TUSDT BUY 3260 @ 0.0050540
🔴😾 MUBARAKUSDT SELL 42299 @ 0.0281347
🟢😾 UAIUSDT BUY 23 @ 0.4336000
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,140 posts we hold for @REKTbinance. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@binance_liquidations01 · 52,064
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 27 August 2026
@WhaleSniper · 60,453
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
@whalebotalerts · 145,067
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 13 August 2026
@WhaleDV · 29,010
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 9 September 2026
@BinanceLiquidations · 181,534
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
@datadikdasmen · 61,403
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 27 August 2026
@cmcal_bot · 30,713
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 6 September 2026
@SM_News_24h · 42,316
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
@whale_alert_io · 301,693
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 10 August 2026
@ASTrading77 · 40,187
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 30 August 2026
@cryptobulletofficialTG · 44,265
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 5 September 2026
@news_crypto · 99,733
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
@bitcoin_price · 56,352
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 23 August 2026
@tumbuhkayasaham · 98,736
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 August 2026
@cryptoquant_alert · 71,256
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 20 August 2026
@rose · 85,750
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 August 2026
@BillionaireTrader99 · 33,812
Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 3 September 2026
@coachteddydiego · 54,514
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 27 August 2026
@inforcasn · 116,168
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 27 August 2026
@CryptoCove · 29,095
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 9 September 2026
@BCUSAReal · 148,051
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
@cccio · 34,060
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 3 September 2026
@Markas_Trader · 31,820
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 September 2026
@PAIDROSE · 143,453
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
This channel appears in 59 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Binance liquidations” (@REKTbinance), 20,196 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/REKTbinance.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.